EUSSR Guinea-Bissau : Relative Succes or Preordained Failure? (original) (raw)
Related papers
ECOWAS Mission in Bissau (ECOMIB) and Peace Operations in Guinea Bissau, 1998-2015
HUMANUS DISCOURSE, 2024
This paper analyses ECOMIB's contribution to international peacekeeping operations in Guinea-Bissau during the period 1998-2015. It is an important paper that has examined the contribution to peace, security and development of Guinea-Bissau by a specific international military organisation. Contributions to peace and security has engaged the attention of scholars, commentators and public policy makers in Nigeria and globally, and is also the subject-matter of this paper. The study's findings have shown that socioeconomic and political development eluded Guinea-Bissau as a result of issues which militated against the country in the post-colonial period. It has advanced the argument that Nigeria and other countries made significant contribution to peace and stability in Guinea-Bissau through the mobilisation, training and deployment of ECOMIB forces for peace operations. The paper has argued that the role of leadership and governance remains imperative for the long-term consolidation and sustainability of the peace process in Guinea-Bissau. The methodology adopted for the paper is the historical research method, the multidisciplinary approach, conflict, war and peace scholarly perspectives, positivist and critical social science methods, using primary and secondary source materials. In conclusion, the paper has added to the body of knowledge by expanding debate on Guinea-Bissau's post-colonial predicament and the intervention of ECOMIB forces from Nigeria and others within the West African community.
EU’s Footprint in the DR Congo- CSDP missions and the mixed achievements
The paper will look into the EU’s “boots on the ground” operations in DR Congo and the broad mix of civilian and military elements put together under CSDP mandates in order to offer response to international crises. Therefore, the focus will be directed towards the factors that influenced the achievement of the mandates’ objectives and the relative results of the different institutional set-ups on the ground. Firstly, will debate upon the field reality and the implications arising from practical, on the ground coordination and adjustment in a wider multilateral setup. Secondly, will look into the pressing challenges in DRC and how the mandate responses sought to alleviate internal tensions, in particular in the area of Security Sector Reform. Last, but not least, will look at a few CSDP shortcomings and analyze the way they affected the potential of the missions to enforce significant progress. In order to better illustrate the three arguments, a general overview of the five EU past and current missions will be provided. In addition, EUSEC DR Congo and EUPOL RD Congo missions will serve as case studies for analysis.
The European Union’s Common Security and Defense Policy (CSDP) which is used as an instrument for crisis management, peace, development and more, has not only been active in crisis management in Asia, Middle East, Europe ,Horn of Africa but very prominently in Central Africa. This papers sets out to analyze the CSDP’s mission to Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) with particular focus on: Why the CSDP went on a mission to DRC, its legacy, some lessons learnt from this mission, formulation of specific policy recommendation or some major guidelines to be considered by EU/CSDP for future military or civilian actions.
Definition and Typology of European Union Missions
Reality of Politics
In view of the contemporary challenges and threats, European Union’s efforts in the area of civil and military capacity building are extremely important. As an international organization having a high impact on third countries, the European Union plays a key role in conflict prevention and crisis response. In external governance EU has two sectoral policies at its disposal: the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Common Security and Defense Policy (CSDP). The CFSP is responsible for resolving conflicts and fostering international understanding using diplomacy and giving respect for international rules. The CSDP is responsible for carrying out civilian and military missions as well as for diffusing rules, which affect, in various respects, the improvement of security management in third countries through their incorporation. By adopting today’s global approach, both military and civilian, to crisis management and continuing to strengthen its capacity for action and anal...
EUnity of Command – The Planning and Conduct of CSDP Operations. Egmont Paper No. 41, January 2011
With the aim of contributing to the debate about the agenda of the forthcoming Polish Presidency of the EU in the second half of 2011, in November 2010 Egmont organized an international expert seminar in Brussels with its sister institute from Warsaw, PISM – the Polish Institute of International Affairs, under the heading Crisis Management Operations: European Lessons Learned. The EU has undeniably become an important actor in the field of crisis management. In view of its expertise and its capabilities, the demand for CSDP operations, both civilian and military, can only be expected to increase. The EU is also reshaping its institutional architecture and its procedures for crisis management. The establishment of the Crisis Management and Planning Directorate (CMPD) and its integration into the External Action Service (EAS) are determining for the future shape of EU crisis management. As this re-engineering of the CSDP machinery is in full swing, the moment is right to take stock of...
EU has taken on the role of guaranteeing long-term stability through different measures of conflict prevention and peacebuilding in two countries of the Western Balkans, which have undergone a severe armed conflict in the 1990s. This paper undertakes an analysis and evaluation of operational capabilities of civilian mission EULEX Kosovo and military operation EUFOR Althea in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It draws lessons learned from the challenges the missions have faced in this field of functioning, namely operational capabilities. Furthermore, the article provides a quality assessment comparing both missions' operational capabilities, which can lead to improvement in approaches.