Architecture and Spatial Practices in Post-Communist Minsk: Urban Space under Authoritarian Control (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Phenomenon of Minsk: City Space and Cultural Narrative
The article addresses the issue of cultural identification of Minsk as an Eastern European post-Soviet capital. In order to understand the city's present it is necessary to consider the radical changes it underwent in the 20th century, including almost a total destruction, radical change in ethnic structure, rapid after-war spatial expansion and, lately, the intensive symbolic production as a post-Soviet capital. To identify the characteristic features of Minsk through the sociological lens, cultural theory as well as historical reconstruction and cross-national comparison are employed. The article seeks to reflect the organisation of space and cultural narrative produced in Minsk today, as well as to consider the common strategies of thinking about Minsk. The changing statuses of Minsk and its symbolic role in the last century necessitate a profound reconceptualization of Minsk as a phenomenon. The authors argue that the analysis of the ongoing changes in post-Soviet capitals (both in and out of the European Union (EU)) presupposes the reconstruction of their socio-cultural context.
2016
In contemporary urban studies, the physical reconstruction of cities is achieving a new dimension, which is reflected in the urban resilience that is expressed as the physical, social, cultural and economic capability of urban structures to respond to anthropogenic or natural catastrophes. In this paper, we study the reconstruction processes of Minsk, Belarus, which was almost completely destroyed and rebuilt as a new city after World War II, in order to understand in which way specific social and political conditions may have influence on the physical rebuilding of urban and architectural form in “devastated” cities. We based our analysis on study of Master Plans from different periods. In particular, we focused on the Master Plan 1946 analysing its specific characteristic and linking them to political and social circumstances of post-war period. We conclude that Minsk was reconstructed as a model for a new Soviet city that brings us to a question: could the Soviet architecture and...
Making Sense of the Post-Soviet Capital: Politics of Identity in the City of Minsk
Independence in 1991 and the need to construct a new national identity have drawn the attention of national post-Soviet political elites to the capital cities. Minsk was unique in this process because the set of possible cultural interpretations was initially limited there to post-war architecture that represented the Soviet power and its attributes. In this study, I analyzed cultural narratives in the space of Minsk as represented by the names of the places, the outer look and decorations of the city. For this purpose, I conducted content-analysis of historical and modern names of the city objects, and interpreted the strategies of building new nat ional identity by the authorit ies. I found that the current narrative of national identity in Minsk is constructed on the basis of the 1945 Victory of WWII and the pre-communist 19th century history of the city’s development. These are symbolically promoted and legitimized strategies to interpret Minsk. Moreover, the current project of national identity in Minsk strives for a monopoly, thus cutting down on the sources of other identities of the city. However, new capitalist features are increasingly including Minsk into global capitalist dynamics.
Dynamic Cityscapes: Contesting the Soviet City
2011
Even in the Soviet period, Russian cities were negotiated entities, emerging from the complex intersection of institutional, social, and political interests. As seen in Nizhnii Novgorod in the 1930s, despite the Stalinist government’s overarching economic and political power, no truly centralized program for the city’s growth emerged. The conflict-ridden interplay of planners, municipal leaders, industrial interests, Politburo demands, and common residents determined the city’s actual, as opposed to planned, development. In effect, as Sovietera planners complained, the city built itself. The Limits of Planning Visitors to Nizhnii Novgorod in 2010 will discover a city transformed by new construction projects, which have gradually replaced the low-rise wooden buildings of the late Imperial and early Soviet period with up-to-date residential and commercial complexes. Popular reactions to this change have been mixed, ranging from an excited embrace of such symbols of prosperity to regre...
Ideological recycling of the socialist legacy. Reading Townscapes of Minsk and Astana
Europe-Asia Studies, 2017
Abstract. This article addresses the ways in which the systemic transformation of the former Soviet republics has been reflected in urban development in two capital cities, Minsk (Belarus) and Astana (Kazakhstan). Changes taking place in these capitals have been analysed through the prism of an ideological recycling of the socialist legacy, a concept that permits exploration of which aspects of the socialist legacy have been jettisoned and which retained, in the process of formation of a capital. The article explores the nationalizing strategies adopted by Belarus and Kazakhstan and reified by various practices, including those involving the recasting of cities. These strategies, however, are analysed not as inventions of post-Soviet regimes, but as forms of structural continuity.
Architecture and the State: Moscow Urban Concepts after Socialism
After the collapse of the Soviet Union the search for alternative identities in Russian architecture was projected onto the fundamental reversal and ultimate decline of state structures formerly responsible for design and construction. The evolution of Soviet architecture through post-war decades—from excessive neoclassicism of the 1950s, to technologism of the 1960s, to mass prefab construction of the 1970s, to regionalism of the 1980s, to reconstructivism of the 1990s—follows the metamorphoses of socialist and post-socialist political cycles. New transformations in Russian architecture aim to manifest new identities and glorify national unification. Guidelines offered in this paper: 1) A brief analysis on the “crisis” in Russian architecture with an emphasis on intimate intertwined connections between architecture and society under socialism; 2) The alternate philosophies behind the terms: "utopia" and "fantasy" in architecture and a narrative of Paper architecture of the 1980s showcasing the new generation of Russian architects and the work they created in opposition to official guideline. Also highlighted are threads vectoring historical milestones of Russian revolutionary architecture of the 1920s, and western architecture experiences of the 1970s veiled in the Soviet Union as “alien ideology”; 3) The transformations in Russian architecture of the 1980s–90s, illuminated within the integral framework as underground tremors of societal change; 4) Review of primary concepts of the Moscow urban development with focus on five essential threads. A multitude of other approaches are not introduced due to their limited novelty or inadequate standing within the discipline.
The Socialist Design: Urban Dilemmas in Postwar Europe and the Soviet Union
Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2012
Taking a cue from two rigorous and insightful books—Stephen Bittner's account of the "many lives" of the Soviet Thaw and Greg Castillo's study of the Cold War as a series of battles in design and the domestic sphere—as well as a recent explosion of interest among historians in the Khrushchev era, "spatial history," material culture, and East-West exchanges, this article addresses the paradoxes of the Thaw as exemplified in urban form. It argues for the interconnected nature of domestic, international, and Eastern bloc-level dynamics by viewing processes of the Thaw simultaneously from the angles of neighborhood, city, and empire. These angles capture the evolving relationship with the Soviet past, the expansion of the Cold War into everyday city life, and the burgeoning exchange in knowledge, technology, and planning instruments among socialist countries
(European Architectural History Network) The paper discusses how the concept of " heritage " has been employed in interpretations of the Soviet architectural legacy in the Belarusian capital Minsk, producing competing geopolitical narratives of Belarusian national development. The logic of Soviet cultural heritage-making in Belarus has been underpinned by the overlapping aims and intentions of various different actors. The paper aims to explore the correlation between professional architectural discourses on the status of the Soviet architectural legacy and strategies for the appropriation of the Soviet past in the official politics of Belarus. In the post-independence period, the professional architectural discourse reassessing the Soviet architectural legacy of Minsk so far as heritage was concerned concentrated on the aesthetic value of Soviet architecture in Minsk, but it relied implicitly upon the perception that the postwar reconstruction period in Belarus had been a " golden age " for Belarusians. While there have been recent attempts of re-framing the cultural artefacts representing socialist realism in terms of " heritage " in countries of Eastern and Central Europe. In marked contrast to the case of Belarus, however, not one of these countries sought to combine this international symbolic capital of the socialist legacy with the status of " national heritage " .