PANORAMA INTERNACIONAL DAS PATENTES BIOTECNOLÓGICAS Meio Ambiente e Proteção ao Patrimônio Genético INTERNATIONAL OVERVIEW PATENT BIOTECH Environmental and Genetic Resources (original) (raw)

A Biotecnologia movimenta bilhões de dólares anualmente e encontra especial proteção no direito das patentes. A patente, como título concedido ao inventor, tem na lei uma série de requisitos, bem como de vedações. Analisa-se o patenteamento de organismos vivos, no todo ou em parte, em especial a possibilidade de patentear material genético. Para tanto, avalia-se o assunto na legislação e em alguns posicionamentos de escritórios de patentes nos Estados Unidos, Europa e Brasil, destacando a importância das patentes na própria constituição da OMC. Por fim, conclui-se pela necessidade de se abordar o tema não apenas pelo viés comercial, mas também pelo enfoque da repartição de benefícios. Abstract: The Biotechnology move billions of dollars each year and is specially protected by patenting. The law establishes the requirements for granting patents, as well as lists the prohibitions. The situation of patents on living organisms, in whole or in part, in particular thepatentability of genetic material, is here examined. Therefore, we evaluate it in legislation and in some placements patent offices in the United States, Europe and Brazil. It also highlighted the importance of patents in the constitution of the WTO. Lastly, we conclude by the need to address the issue not only for commercial bias, but also the focus of benefit sharing.

Sign up for access to the world's latest research.

checkGet notified about relevant papers

checkSave papers to use in your research

checkJoin the discussion with peers

checkTrack your impact

Reviewing International Patent Policy on Biotechnological Inventions and the Adequacy of Equitable Benefit Sharing Principle

UUM journal of legal studies, 2020

The purpose of this study is to review the international patent policy related to biotechnological inventions, particularly from the Venetian Patent Law to the TRIPs Agreement. It closely examines whether such inventions fulfill the patentability thresholds and analyses the reason why such patents are regarded as having the potential to cause facility misappropriation of biodiversity, which is considered unfair. The most important part of this study is the adequacy analysis of the principles of equitable benefit sharing of the Convention on Biodiversity (CBD), including disclosure requirements and prior informed consent (PIC), to prevent misappropriation of biological resources in this era of the fourth industrial revolution. This study is based on the normative legal research method and uses primary and secondary legal resources. The analysis conducted for this study employed several approaches, which were statute, conceptual, and historical approaches. This study found that patent protection for biotechnological inventions has received justification since the Paris Convention. However, the current international patent policy has the potential to facilitate misappropriation of biodiversity and it is UUMJLS 11(2), July 2020 (203-224) 204 regarded as unfair. On the other hand, the equitable benefit sharing principle is still inadequate in dealing with such misappropriation. It advises the requirement of mandatory disclosure of origin to be regulated under national law as a legal basis for implementing the equitable benefit sharing principle.

Patents and Biotechnology: Morality restraints of article 53(a) of the EPO

2020

This dissertation was written as part of the LLM in Transnational and European Commercial Law/ Banking Law/ Arbitration/ Mediation of the International Hellenic University. The present dissertation constitutes an analysis of patent law applied on the emerging biotechnological inventions. Biotechnology inserted many innovations which are on benefit of humanity especially in the field of medicine and agriculture. Due to the fact that biotechnology procedures are something completely new, many doubts had arisen concerning the morality of the biotechnological inventions and the preservation of public ordre. On this paper are analyzed some of the most important cases that the EPO has deal with and that all of them had provoke morality issues and matters concerning public ordre on behalf of patentability of the inventions. Specifically, the dissertation focuses on the application and the problematics of Article 53(a) which inserts the exceptions of patentability in the sector of Animal Genetics, Human Genetics and Plant Genetics.

Patents and Public Health in the WTO, FTAs and Beyond: Tension and Conflict in International Law

By mandating patent protection for pharmaceutical products, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) creates difficulties for developing countries seeking to import medicines to deal with serious public health concerns. In 2001, WTO Members began working towards a solution to this problem. Their work led to a temporary waiver of certain TRIPS obligations and a proposal for a formal amendment of the TRIPS Agreement. However, the waiver remains underutilized and the amendment still lacks the necessary support of WTO Members for it to come into effect, suggesting that Members need to re-evaluate their commitment to affordable medicines while testing the workability of the waiver before making it permanent. Moreover, the potential of bilateral approaches to the problem of access to medicines for developing countries in the context of international trade is not being realized. On the contrary, preferential trade agreements concluded with the United States (US), in particular, are extending patent protection and diminishing flexibilities available under the TRIPS Agreement to address public health concerns. A pattern of contradictions exists between the WTO rhetoric on the one hand and Members' domestic frameworks, bilateral agreements, and unilateral actions on the other. When it comes to attaining a coherent approach under international law towards reconciling patents and public health, the outlook is bleak.

The Quality of Patents on Biotech Inventions: The International Cooperation on the Non-Obviousness Standards

2013

The patent system shall work properly to achieve an appropriate balance of interests between innovators, third parties and the public if it is to serve its purpose of promoting innovation and development. The quality of patents is a crucial aspect of how the patent system operates in order to deliver economic and social policy. However, many granted patents do not reach a sufficient quality standard because of the devaluation of the patent system which is particularly observable within the patentability of biotech inventions. As a result patents are granted for inventions which are not worth of protection. Even though patent offices make a significant contribution to the proper functioning of the patent system to ensure that the patents they grant meet the standards, their effort is not high enough. Hence, the WIPO took up an international initiative to focus on improving the quality of the patent system, namely of patents granted worldwide. The aim of this paper is to present the a...

On Aiding Technological Development: The Max Planck Declaration on Patent Protection

2015

The Declaration on Patent Protection is a welcome addition to the Max Planck Institute’s work on the flexibilities available under the TRIPS Agreement. Like the previously published Copyright Declaration, it improves on the WTO’s interpretations of the three-part open-ended exceptions provisions of the TRIPS Agreement. Furthermore, it attempts to clarify the other regulatory options that are retained under TRIPS. Here, we contend, the Declaration makes three mistakes. First, its aggressive interpretations of certain provisions undermine its credibility, making it a less useful resource than a document prepared by such notable scholars might be. Second, the options, if adopted in toto, would significantly undermine incentives to invent. Yet the Declaration does not provide guidance on which options a state that is intent on encouraging innovation should adopt. Third, the Declaration’s focus on the provisions in TRIPS that maintain sovereign regulatory authority misses the Agreement’s...

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.