The Influence of the Prague School on Milan Kundera’s Essays (original) (raw)
Related papers
Czytanie Literatury. Łódzkie Studia Literaturoznawcze
The interview with Marek Bieńczyk covers, in general, the subject of the philosophy of novel by Milan Kundera and the reception of his works nowadays in Poland and abroad. Marek Bieńczyk – the French translator of Milan Kundera’s novels – talks about the history of his first translations and the beginnings of scientific thinking about Kundera. Moreover, he explains the problems connected with Kundera’s authorial and elaborate philosophy of novel: the conception of narrator, hero and composition. Bieńczyk also narrates his own memories with M. Kundera. What is more, he indicates the inspirations he draws in his own work from innovative prose by Czech novelist, who is celebrating his 91st anniversary this year.
Jakub Češka: The Fundamentals of Milan Kunderas Poetics, Renyxa, No.12, 2022. pp.222-250.(1)
Renyxa, 2022
The study is devoted to the early fundamental starting points of Milan Kundera’s work from the 1950s to the 1960s. According to the later authorial stylisation, the novelist is born from the ruins of his lyrical world. This assertion creates an impression of a direct, linear authorial development, in which somewhere at the beginning is Kundera’s poetry, which the author later abandons in favour of the novel upon reaching an age of artistic maturity. However, if we follow the actual course of Kundera’s poetics, we find that this conception does not correspond with the dynamics of the author’s development. This it not only because in the creative phase in which the author wrote poetry, he also wrote his first prose texts, but also because his work as a novelist is dependent upon lyrical devices (metaphors, the evocation of inner experiences etc.). For this reason, in this study I shall focus on defining three creative principles – lyrical, dramatic and novel writing. These poetic principles are not exclusively bound to the corresponding genres. The resulting form of the literary work is determined by their mutual relationship, proportions and configuration (whether this concerns poetry, drama or the novel).
BÍLEK, Petr A.; PAPOUŠEK, Vladimír. Models of Representations in Czech Literary History. Boulder: East European Monographs, 2010. 209 p. ISBN 978-0-88033-680-2.
and ending for the moment with Donald Davidson or Umberto Eco, there have been thousands of pages covered with argumentation that focuses on the same issue: in using a proper name, what do we refer to? A psycho-physiological unity of a unique person or a conceptual construct based on some ency clopedic or cultural code reduction? In the case of Milan Kundera's Czech reception,1 one can not avoid addressing such an issue again and again. When Czech critics, literary historians and interpreters say "Milan Kundera," what do they refer to? Almost never explored explic itly, such a notion seems to be the key to most of the rhetorical agendas and evaluative attempts one can notice when focusing on the ways "Kundera" has been interpreted in the Czech con text between the 1960s and 1990s.
Franz Kafka and His Prague Contexts: Studies in Language and Literature
Franz Kafka and His Prague Contexts: Studies in Language and Literature, 2016
Franz Kafka is by far the Prague author most widely read and admired internationally. However, his reception in Czechoslovakia, launched by the Liblice conference in 1963, has been conflicted. While rescuing Kafka from years of censorship and neglect, Czech critics of the 1960s “overwrote” his German and Jewish literary and cultural contexts in order to focus on his Czech cultural connections. Seeking to rediscover Kafka’s multiple backgrounds, in Franz Kafka and His Prague Contexts Marek Nekula focuses on Kafka’s Jewish social and literary networks in Prague, his German and Czech bilingualism, and his knowledge of Yiddish and Hebrew. Kafka’s bilingualism is discussed in the context of contemporary essentialist views of a writer’s “organic” language and identity. Nekula also pays particular attention to Kafka’s education, examining his studies of Czech language and literature as well as its role in his intellectual life. The book concludes by asking how Kafka “read” his urban environment, looking at the readings of Prague encoded in his fictional and non-fictional texts.
Poética estrutural em movimento: Jan Mukařovský e Roman Jakobson | RUS v. 12 n. 19 | ago.2021
Poética estrutural em movimento: Jan Mukařovský e Roman Jakobson, 2021
There are many perspectives that we may adopt when writing a history of literary theory and criticism and, in general, a history of literary thought. One of the approaches that I consider stimulating is the mapping of personal relationships between various literary scholars.The study deals with the relationship between two literary scholars: Jan Mukařovský and Roman Jakobson. The study analyses their transformation in the broad context of their life and work, but also in the context of the political and cultural events that took place during their lifetime. The central point of the study is an outline of the epistemological basis of Mukařovský ́s and Jakobson ́s structural poetics. Five key theoretical and methodological principles are: 1) A work of art is a sui generisphenomenon; 2) The principle of whole and part; 3) Movement. Literature is in constant motion; 4) Working with (literary) material; 5) A work of art is a sign. Art is a system of signs. (continua na p. 1)
MATERIALI DI ESTETICA. TERZA SERIE N. 4.2 2017, 2017
This is the first translation of Brod’s text which was originally published on the weekly newspaper “Die Zeit” on 22.10.1965. This edition, compared with the one in “The Prague Circle” (1966), also presents a new translation of Kafka’s only known aesthetical fragment of 1906 upon the experience of beauty and novelty, two elements which play a salient role in the whole of his narrative. Brod’s suggestions as well as Kafka’s counterarguments encompass the process of knowledge thus developing peculiar points of view upon subjectivity and creative processes. German-Jewish Cultural Studies and Philosophy; German Literature; Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism; Intermediality and Intertextuality are here to be reckoned with KEY-WORDS Franz Kafka – Max Brod – Aesthetical Pleasure – Beauty – Novelty - Narratives – “psicologico” instead of “physiologisch” – Representational Processes - Body as Involved in Writing Strategies Aesthetics – Fiction – Creative Processes – Beauty – Novelty – Arguments vs Counterarguments; Intermediality; Intertextuality; Max Brod – Franz Kafka