Popular Mobilization and Democratization: A Comparative Study of South Korea and Taiwan (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Dynamics of Popular Reactions to Democratization in Korea
Journal of Public Policy, 1999
The central argument of this paper is that, rather than simply absorbing democratic values diffusely, Koreans have acquired their support for democratization incrementally through experience with the consequences of regime change. In order to account for this pattern, we develop an empirical model that distinguishes between democracy as an ideal (desirability) and democracy understood as a viable political system (suitability). We draw on a survey of the Korean public to demonstrate that changes in these dimensions follow distinct trajectories, according to the recollections of our respondents, during the course of democratization. While beliefs about democracy-in-principle appear to be fairly impervious to political events and socioeconomic conditions, attitudes toward democracy-in-practice reflect a learning curve as the transition unfolds. We estimate the relative impact of evaluations of the economy, of the quality of life, and of governmental performance and political experienc...
Revisiting the Democratic Transition in South Korea and Taiwan
Asian Political Science Review, 2021
This paper explores the transition to democracy in Taiwan and South Korea, as two East-Asian countries which have moved successfully away from authoritarian rule. These two East-Asian states are particularly noteworthy to students of democratic transition because of nature of their previous authoritarian regimes as well as their Confucian cultural values were not compatible with democratic value. Despite this, the democratic transition in both countries was reached with peaceful transition. Entering the third decade after the democratic transition, their democracy is not, however, fully consolidated and both countries are facing political turbulences; nevertheless, the people in both countries seem determined to move forward democratically. Therefore, their experience is useful for countries elsewhere which are experiencing the transition from authoritarianism; specifically, South Korea and Taiwan provide a model for how other countries might move to democracy.
Consolidation of democracy in South Korea
2014
Although South Korea has accomplished a democratic transition, democraticconsolidation has not been achieved. The study investigates this notion on thebasis of criteria of democratic consolidation, how the presidents have fulfilledtheir promises on the deepening of democracy and how the Articles in the1987 Constitution on democracy have been implemented. What developmentssupport and disapprove this notion? The interaction between domestic politicsand the implementation of the Constitution during the presidents’ five yearterms in office is analyzed. Great consideration is put on the Confucian impacton politics and the short period of implementing democracy.
Democracy Is More than a Political System: Lessons from South Korea's Democratic Transformation
The Asan Forum, 2018
An assessment of South Korea's democratization requires acknowledging juxtaposing patterns. On the one hand, the shadow of an authoritarian, Cold War state hangs over the country's politics. State-society relations constructed under deeply illiberal circumstances did not disappear with the transition to democracy. On the other hand, developments in 2016-17 proved that South Korea's democracy is among the most resilient in the world. When political institutions failed to prevent the corruption of an insulated elite, ordinary citizens intervened. While "populism" runs roughshod over democratic institutions elsewhere, South Korea's democracy has demonstrated a capacity to overcome serious challenges. Optimism and a feeling of empowerment pervade the country at this moment, in stark contrast to the political gloom found elsewhere. South Korea's democracy stands out as remarkable, even though there are strong elements of continuity from the past that impose restrictions on which voices gain representation. The final version is available http://www.theasanforum.org/democracy-is-more-than-a-political-system-lessons-from-south-koreas-democratic-transformation/ .
Master Thesis , 2016
Republic of Korea (South Korea) and the Republic of China (Taiwan), once notorious autocratic garrison states in East Asia, went through a fairly smooth and stable transition to achieve consolidated democracy only two decades after they joined the “Third Wave” in the 1980s. This success is remarkable considering only few new democracies survived and reached consolidation. In particular, they managed to solve the ‘praetorian problem’ which has been the biggest obstacle for many new democracies to reach consolidation. Therefore, this paper explores the role of the security sector in South Korea and Taiwan and its impact on successful democratic consolidation. To analyse this research question, this paper uses the ‘transitology’ approach to democratization as its theoretical base, which studies the role of agents in the process of democratization. The research relies on the ‘process tracing’ methodology to examine the relationship between the role of security sector and the success of democratization. Accordingly, six propositions were extracted from the democratization literature and applied to the cases of South Korea and Taiwan. As a result, this study proposes that the six factors critical in establishing a solid democratic control of the security sector in two countries were: 1) legacy of civilian supremacy, 2) factionalism of the security institutions, 3) strong external threat, 4) strong presidency, 5) societal divisions, and 6) the US as a norm promotor. This paper also affirms that the establishment and consolidation of firm civilian democratic control of the security sector was fundamental in the successful and stable transition and consolidation towards democracy in both countries.
Contentious Institutionalization of Protests under Democracy: The Evidence from Taiwan, 1986–2016
Government and Opposition
While many scholarly works are concerned with how social protests promote democratization, this article addresses the causally reverse question: how democratization shapes the landscape of street protests. We use a unique database of 31 years of protest events in Taiwan, a smooth and successful case of authoritarianism-to-democracy transition, to engage in a dialogue with political transition theory, the institutionalization thesis and networked movement theory. The logistic regression analysis indicates that protest violence persists under consolidated democracy, but it is marginalized. We find an indirect effect from the growth of social movement organizations that foster the adaptation of festive and performative tactics, which are less confrontational in nature. Politicians' involvement, however, remains a constant source of disruptiveness. Our conclusion of contentious institutionalization finds that late-democratizing countries also gravitate towards becoming a ‘social mov...
The Impact of Social Movements on Taiwan's Democracy
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 2010
This article discusses and critiques the four articles that comprise this volume on Taiwan's social movement and democratization. I argue that the four articles suggest that while Taiwan's social movements have made a clear impact on Taiwan's democratization, they remain challenged by the neo-liberal orientation of elected governments, in both KMT and DPP forms. The article provides brief comparison to East Asian NICs and Western experiences with social movements. A strength of the articles is their attention to the complex ways social movements and democratization have impacted each other for the past two decades, with attention to unintended consequences. It concludes with some thoughts on the implications of how nationalism and globalization will continue to shape the potential of social movements in Taiwan.