THE WINDING ROAD ON THE MEDIA LANDSCAPE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ESTONIAN (TELEVISION) BROADCASTING BETWEEN 1992 AND 2016 (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Undercurrents of Estonian Broadcasting Regulation, 1992–2014
This article explores the ways in which different external and internal factors (especially politics and economics) have encouraged or hindered the evolution of Estonian Public Broadcasting. This article argues that the Estonian government’s ‘idealisation’ of market forces that is supported by European Union (EU) media policy and driven by the common market ideology does not take into account the actual abilities of a small country’s media companies to provide a wide range of media services, and thereby limits the offerings of high-quality local content. The research methodology is based on an analysis of EU media policy documents, Estonian media legislation and broadcasters’ annual reports in the period from 1992 to 2014. The main finding of this article is that official Estonian media policy is largely shaped by the financial results of private media companies.
The Winding Road on the Media Landscape
VIEW Journal of European Television History and Culture
This article aims to explore the ways in which Estonian broadcasting (with a focus on television) tackled the challenges of transforming from a monopolistic party propaganda machine into a modern dual media system in which public service broadcasting and newly created private enterprises coexist; and how this process evolved in a small post-communist country. This article argues that the Estonian government’s ‘idealisation’ of market forces supported by the European Union media policy, which is driven by common market ideology, did not take into account the market’s limitations and media companies’ actual capability to provide a large range of media services. The research methodology is based on an analysis of EU media policy documents, Estonian media legislation, the protocols of the Cultural Affairs Committee of the Parliament of Estonia, protocols of the broadcasters’ licensing committee at the Ministry of Culture and the broadcasters’ annual reports from the period 1992 - 2015. ...
Transformation of Post-Communist Broadcast Media: A Case Study of Estonia
2000
The world in the late twentieth century experienced a third wave of democratization. Most notable was the collapse of the Soviet Union and the demise of communism in Eastern Europe. Among the challenges confronting these countries was the transformation of their state broadcast structures into independent democratic broadcast systems. This study utilized a case study and historical approach to examine the restructuring of a broadcast media system in a postcommunist country, Estonia. The implications that can be drawn from this study is that post-Communist broadcast system transformations are complex, especially considering the formidable challenges confronting a country as it revamps both its political and economic system. RUNNING HEAD: TRANSFORMATION OF POST-COMMUNIST BROADCAST MEDIA Baltic State approached the transformation of their broadcast media and to compare their developments. In addition, research on the other Baltic States could also serve to contrast each country's political and cultural differences, and what influences these had on the reform and development of their respective broadcast systems. BIBLIOGRAPHY Arneson, P. (1993). Situating three contemporary qualitative methods in applied organizational communication research: Historical documentation techniques, the case study method, and the critical approach to organizational analysis. In S. L. Herndon & G. L. Kreps (Eds.), Qualitative research: Applications in
PSM – home alone in a narrowcasting era? A case study: the Estonian public broadcasting
This article aims at exploring the ways in which the Estonian Public Broadcasting (EPB) tackles challenges of modern public service media (PSM) companies, how different external and internal factors (especially politics, economics, and technology) encourage or hinder the (online) evolution of Estonian Public Broadcasting. Starting with McQuail’s (2010) theoretical framework of media institutions’ influencers, the article investigates how the media policy, economic conditions and technology changes have influenced these processes (Doyle, 2013; Picard, 2011). Also, broadcasters themselves have taken different approaches towards their role in the new media environment (Doyle, 2010; Ranaivoson et al., 2013). Traditional PSM remit should be kept up to date with the demands of information society (Lowe et al., 2014; Bardoel and d’Haenens, 2008). This is a fundamental challenge to the funding and governance of PSM. Market pressure to reduce the PSM funding makes the expansion into online media difficult. However, audiences, especially younger ones, abandon traditional broadcasting channels and are attracted to the online world. This article analyzes different aspects of the the adjustment of Estonian Public Broadcasting with media changes and trends and the outcome of this process. The aim of the research is to give an answer to the question: How do different external and internal factors (especially politics, economics, and technology) encourage or hinder the development of the Estonian Public Broadcasting?
Is the Role of Public Service Media in Estonia Changing?
Baltic Screen Media Review
The need to re-structure established media systems needs to be acknowledged. In a situation where new services will be provided by different actors of the digital economy, the role of public service media (PSM) requires attention. If, generally, PSM are under pressure in Europe, the situation in small national markets is even more complicated. PSM are under pressure and also need to find ways to reformulate their role in society and culture. Broad discussions and new agreements between politicians, citizens and the media industry are necessary to change this situation. We will approach the question of whether a specific gap still exists in the media market that can be filled by PSM? The article will seek these answers based on various survey data and collected statistics in Estonia.
Polarised television audiences. The outcomes of the Estonian and European audiovisual media policies
The European Union’s (EU) liberalisation of media policies and its content quality bias towards economic efficiency has resulted in a situation where, in some small markets like Estonia, the audience is divided into two parts. e Russian-speaking audience in Estonia mainly follows Russian state TV channels, and the Estonian-speaking audience watches Estonian television channels. is has happened even though the EU media policy should ensure freedom of information, diversity of opinion and media pluralism. Findings from the Estonian case study show that despite the noble aim of the EU media policy, Estonia has two radically different information fields: Estonian-language media promotes European values, and Russian state media, enjoying high popularity among the Russian speakers, promotes ‘Putin’s values’. The question is whether the EU legal instrument — Audiovisual Me- dia Service Directive (AVMSD) — is an efficient tool when disinformation from third countries is disseminated with the aim of gaining a political influence over the EU member states’ citizens. e recommendation is that the AVMSD should be revised in a way that prevents unfair competition directed from third countries and tools should be developed to compensate for market failures.
Liberal turn in media policy: the case of Finland's digital television
International Journal of Digital Televison, 2010
According to the influential typology by Daniel Hallin and Paolo Mancini, Finland's media system follows the democratic corporatist model, rather than the polarized plural or the liberal model. The article analyses digitalization of television in Finland and, in particular, its licensing policy as an example of convergence of national media systems towards the liberal model. Using original media policy documents and recent research on programme structures, the analysis reveals that, with multiplied channel capacity, increasing 'consumer choice' became an end in itself in the Finnish media policy since the mid-1990s. As this is associated with licensing an ever-growing number of commercially targeted and formatted channels competing for popularity among mainstream market segments, the shift from the earlier public service protectionism to an increased market role indicates a change in Finland's media policy paradigm. Instead of providing more alternatives in terms of content, digitalization in Finland only gave viewers greater quantity and, in effect, accelerated a dramatic marketization of broadcasting.
This article argues that until recent times, the Estonian media policy has mainly been interpreted as an economic issue and it did not account for the strategic need to build a comprehensive media field to serve all groups in society. This has happened despite the fact the Estonian media policy is in line with the European Union (EU) media policy, which should ensure freedom of information, diversity of opinion and media pluralism. Findings of the Estonian case study show that despite these noble aims, Estonia has two radically different information fields: one for Estonian speaking audiences and one for Russian speakers. Events in Ukraine have added to the democratic media policy paradigm a question of national security. Now it is a challenge for the policy makers to unite polarised media fields and how to minimise the impact of Russian propaganda. On the EU level, one supportive measure could be a revision of the Audiovisual Media Service Directive.