Hydroacoustic estimates of fish densities in comparison with stratified pelagic trawl sampling in two deep, coregonid-dominated lakes (original) (raw)
Reliable information on fish stocks is given crucial importance in fisheries science and ecosystem management. Among others, the European Water Framework Directive calls for consistent sampling methods that provide comparable and reproducible results. However, the standardized sampling of fish in lakes by gillnets is conducted by low effort only in the pelagic areas, thus potentially not reflecting between-lake variability in fish density. Here, we compared two additional fishing methods, hydroacoustics and midwater trawl sampling, to estimate pelagic coregonid densities in two deep lakes. Night-time trawling was conducted in four different depth layers and compared with the simultaneously obtained abundance and biomass estimates from echo recordings. Overall areal fish biomass from both methods corresponded to each other (R2 = 0.40), with slope and intercept of major axis regression not differing from unity. However, we found differences in estimates for the deepest layers fished, and for very small and the largest coregonids, most likely to be explained by the specific technological details of either method. Our study supports that either hydroacoustics or trawl sampling should accompany gillnet fishing to monitor pelagic fish assemblages. Because both methods result in estimates of absolute fish densities per volume or area, their application may uncover subtle responses of fish assemblages to anthropogenic disturbance in deep lakes.
Related papers
1. Sampling of lake fish assemblages is a challenging task in fish science, and the information obtained strongly depends on the choice of sampling gear. The use of more than one sampling technique is generally preferred in order to achieve a comprehensive view on fish assemblage structure. Therefore, the knowledge of whether catches between fishing gears are comparable is crucial. 2. We compared catches in benthic multi-mesh gillnets with fish biomass estimates obtained by vertical hydroacoustics in 18 European lakes strongly varying in morphometry and trophic status. Separate analyses were conducted for different depth strata and for several fish length thresholds to account for depth- and size-selective gillnet catches. 3. Gillnet catches and hydroacoustically obtained fish biomass estimates were significantly correlated. The strength of correlations was independent of the fish length thresholds applied, but varied across different depth strata of the lakes, with the strongest correlations occurring in the shallow strata. 4. The results support the applicability of vertical hydroacoustics for the quantification of fish biomass in stratified lakes. Survey designs combining hydroacoustics with limited gillnetting at sampling dates shortly one after the other, the latter for the purpose of inventory sampling only, are a cost-effective strategy for sampling fish assemblages in lakes. However, gillnet sampling does not provide reliable fish density estimates in very deep lakes with separate, pelagic-dwelling fish assemblages.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.