RESTRUCTURING IN TURKIC AUXILIARY CONSTRUCTIONS (original) (raw)
Related papers
Delineating Turkic non-finite verb forms by syntactic function
Proceedings of the Workshop on Turkic and Languages in Contact with Turkic, 2019
In this paper, we argue against the primary categories of non-finite verb used in the Turkology literature: “participle” (причастие ‹pričastije›) and “converb” (деепричастие ‹dejepričastije›). We argue that both of these terms conflate several discrete phenomena, and that they furthermore are not coherent as umbrella terms for these phenomena. Based on detailed study of the non-finite verb morphology and syntax of a wide range of Turkic languages (presented here are Turkish, Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Tatar, Tuvan, and Sakha), we instead propose delineation of these categories according to their morphological and syntactic properties. Specifically, we propose that more accurate categories are verbal noun, verbal adjective, verbal adverb, and infinitive. This approach has far-reaching implications to the study of syntactic phenomena in Turkic languages, including phenomena ranging from relative clauses to clause chaining.
Auxiliary verb constructions in Modern Spoken Kazakh [PhD Thesis]
University of Surrey, 2022
The Turkic language Kazakh has a remarkably large set of eighteen auxiliary verbs, which express various tense-aspect-modality (TAM) values in combination with a lexical verb. This thesis presents the first multivariate analysis of auxiliary verb constructions (AVCs) to precisely define the function and distribution of every auxiliary in Modern Spoken Kazakh. Based on corpus data and first-hand fieldwork, I demonstrate that contemporary Kazakh has 28 AVCs, each with a distinctive function. I argue that some morphologically or syntactically ambiguous constructions, hitherto analyzed as AVCs, should be treated as lexical verbs in separate clauses. Previ-ously undescribed AVCs are described, including an unexpected case of stem alternation. The distribu-tional analyses demonstrate that some AVCs are sensitive to syntactic parameters, such as the independ-ence of the clause they head. Others are expressions of a purely semantic feature and thus are insensitive to syntax, such as the modal abilitative. Thus, AVCs are grouped into six classes in order to contrast distinctive distributional behavior with characteristics shared across constructions. The analysis assumes that auxiliaries are periphrastic and thus are part of the lexical verb’s paradigm. Therefore, alongside AVCs, synthetic TAM expressions are investigated and the results include precise descriptions and a novel contrastive analysis of three past tense expressions. The description is complemented by an HPSG style analysis in order to present the system using a rigorous, feature-based approach. This is the first attempt to formalize a large auxiliary system with implemented solutions that lay the grounds for future work on the diachrony of auxiliaries. I propose novel semantic features that account for distinctions including boundedness, phase specification and focus. The main contribution is a systematic, synchronic, fine-grain examination of every Kazakh aux-iliary verb, which makes this complex system available for the general linguist, as well as specialists of TAM and periphrasis.
Issues of grammaticalisation in Turkic modal constructions (pre-final version)
Issues of grammaticalisation in Turkic modal constructions, 2011
Egyetem utca 2 6722 Szeged Hungary Phone/FaxAbstract Grammaticalization is an umbrella term for a set of partly unrelated processes that share a common result, namely the emergence of grammatical units. Although the Turkic languages represent a relatively homogeneous family of closely related languages, they are highly variegated in terms of how they express modal categories. The multitude of expressions stems from a restricted set of developments that can be empirically documented. This paper investigates heterogeneous specimens of expressions of modality in the Turkic languages and identifies the mechanisms that underlie the diachronic and synchronic variation that can be observed in Turkic modal constructions.
On Scrambling the Absolutive Object Phrase in Turkic
Turkic and Mongolic direct object NPs can be either in the accusative form or appear with no case suffix at all. The paper shows that the statement found in practically all grammar books dealing with Turkic languages, that direct object NPs lacking case suffixes have to stand in preverbal position, is erroneous. We show how and why scrambling can affect the sentence positions of such NPs in some Turkic languages spoken in the opposite ends of the Turkic world, also as related to their referential status which, it turns out, changes through different stages of their development.
Issues of grammaticalisation in Turkic modal constructions?
Acta Orientalia, 2011
Grammaticalisation is an umbrella term for a set of partly unrelated processes that share a common result, namely the emergence of grammatical units. Although the Turkic languages represent a relatively homogeneous family of closely related languages, they are highly variegated in terms of how they express modal categories. The multitude of expressions stems from a restricted set of developments that can be empirically documented. This paper investigates heterogeneous specimens of expressions of modality in the Turkic languages and identifies the mechanisms that underlie the diachronic and synchronic variation that can be observed in Turkic modal constructions.
ABSTRACT of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Science, 2021
The need to study non-personal forms of the verb in the Turkic languages is determined by the role they play in the sentence both independently and in combination with other forms and auxiliary verbs, expressing various kinds of temporal and modal shades of action. Comparative study of certain structural elements and grammatical categories in the considered languages is of great scientific importance. The comparative-historical method, as it is known, is one of the leading methods used in comparing the facts of Turkic languages and contributes to the further development of various fields of linguistics. Comparative and historical study of various Turkic languages is the most important and necessary task of modern Turkology. The need for this study, first of all, is dictated by the fact that only the use of comparative-historical methods can more deeply penetrate into the essence of linguistic facts and their connections. Thus, the comparative-historical analysis of non-personal forms of the verb in the Turkic languages will allow a deeper under-standing of their nature as the most extensive class in the verb system. In addition, a systematic and comparative historical study of the composition, meanings and functions of non-personal verb forms in these languages will reveal both their similar and distinctive features.
A Cross-Sectional Study of Auxiliary Verb Types in English and Uzbek Languages
Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture, 2023
In this given article the author analyzed and classified a cross-sectional study of auxiliary verb types in English and Uzbek languages. And she learned addition to the transitive and intransitive verbs, bifunctional verbs have been identified in the English language, the grammatically significant classification of the verbs according to their lexico-grammatical meaning, formation, relation to the object, obligatory valiancy, whether they require prepositional object or not, the limit of the action in the time, the intransitive verbs which can be used in the passive voice and the verbs which are used with a formal subject have been worked out.