Soft Power in a Borderless Digiverse: The Issue of NGOs, Advocacy Groups, and Social Media Simplification (original) (raw)
Related papers
“Social Media at State: Power, Practice, and Conceptual Limits for US Public Diplomacy”
Global Media Journal
Social media technologies represent a significant development for US public diplomacy: both in practice and in conceptualization. This article analyzes policy discourse regarding social media's role in US public diplomacy to characterize conceptual development of US public diplomacy practice. It critically assesses US strategic arguments for technology and public diplomacy, the relation of public diplomacy to traditional diplomacy after the so-called "public diplomacy 2.0" turn, and how the collaborative potential of these developments complicate the utility of soft power to justify public diplomacy.
Media@LSE Working Paper Series, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), 2020
This paper argues that the rising to power of right-wing authoritarian leaders in key United Nations member states poses an existential threat to the Organization and the whole multilateral world order created after the Second World War, which is now facing a process of mass-based disintegration. In a period of unprecedented attacks against the multilateral system, the UN Secretariat relies mostly on digital diplomacy and mediated public diplomacy, through media coverage and a growing social media presence, to inform the global public about its activities and defend its legitimacy. Through the quantitative and qualitative analysis of 6,302 tweets posted on four United Nations flagship Twitter accounts in January-September 2019, this paper shows what kind of messages resonate more with the public and provoke more engagements. It also demonstrates that the UN is not using its social media – and especially so the Secretary-General’s personal account - to their full potential to help the Organization achieving its ‘real-world’ political and diplomatic goals, and to effectively contrast the danger posed by right-wing authoritarian actors. https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/assets/documents/research/working-paper-series/WP-63.pdf
Public Diplomacy in the Digital Age
Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2019
As data fast become the 'new oil' , the opportunities for public diplomacy to grow as a field of practice are real and game-changing. Drawing on social informatics research, this article seeks to advance our understanding of how digital technologies shape the context in which public diplomacy operates by reshaping the medium of public communication , blurring the boundary between foreign and domestic affairs and empowering new actors. Despite inevitable challenges, the future of public diplomacy in the digital age remains bright, as digital technologies create tremendous opportunities for public diplomacy to build stronger, more diverse and more enduring bridges between offline and online communities.
Social Media, Public Participation, and Digital Diplomacy
Proceedings of the 2nd International Indonesia Conference on Interdisciplinary Studies (IICIS 2021), 2021
Social media may have roles in improving government performance in digital diplomacy, roles which may be performed by government or non-government actors. The success of Indonesia's digital diplomacy may be achieved through public or community participation. This research put emphasis on public participation of the Indonesians in digital diplomacy through their uses of social media (Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp, Youtube), Websites, and Applications made by the Government. This research uses documents as the main source of data. Research results show that Indonesians, both in Indonesia and abroad, especially through diaspora organizations, participate in promoting Indonesia, thus participating in digital diplomacy for the interests of Indonesia. The results also that high uses of internets by Indonesians (48% out of 270 millions) is an opportunity for further public participation in digital diplomacy, especially for public aspiration articulation, decision making, and communication involving stakeholders on public diplomacy. It is also an opportunity for publics and government to access data from other countries, to promote Indonesia to foreign countries. However, high uses of internet and social media by Indonesians can also be used by radicals to spread their ideas, for foreign actors to attack Indonesian domestic interests, to spread pornographic contents, and online frauds, both domestically or in international arenas.
The use of soft power in digital public diplomacy
2021
The focus of this comparative study is on the use of soft power in the digital public diplomacy of two Global South players, Brazil and India, in EU member states. The main objective of this research is to find out how their embassies use digital diplomacy in communication through their official websites and to identify which soft power resources they dominantly use. Quantitative content analysis and thematic analysis were used to analyze the categories and subcategories on the main menu and special banners on each embassy’s home page, and the associated content. Unlike the Indian embassies, which fully embraced digital diplomacy 2.0, the Brazilian embassies do not utilize the full potential of digital diplomacy and primarily remain reliant on websites only. According to this research, the Brazilian embassies in the EU use film as a dominant soft power resource in their digital diplomacy, while the Indian embassies use yoga as a powerful diplomatic tool. Still, both approaches are n...
DIGITAL DIPLOMACY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR FOREIGN POLICY
Greenfield Journal of International Relations and Security Studies (GJIRSS), 2022
Digital Diplomacy is the talk of the town in the corridors of international diplomacy. Digital diplomacy as an instrument or tool for foreign policy is the transformation of traditional way of foreign relations to a more advance method. Digital Diplomacy is the growing use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and social media platforms within the conduct of Public Diplomacy. This is believed that the medium has changed but not the message. Instead of talking to foreign publics over the radio, one now communicates with them through a twitter and other channel through the internet. The paper adopted soft power theory to analyze the work; soft power describes the utilization of positive attraction and persuasion to achieve foreign policy objectives. The paper finds out that one of the benefits of digital diplomacy is its ability to foster two-way communication which has improve the practice of foreign policy. Also, the paper discovers that there are challenges faced by digital diplomacy one of which is cyber security; the rapid spread of information which is often an advantage for digital diplomacy, can also turn out to be a great disadvantage. The paper concludes that technology is an asset that can greatly benefit those who use it in the right way; it is not a requirement and should not replace all parts of diplomacy. That when it comes to international affairs, technology will never replace the expertise that can be gained from sending diplomats to foreign countries to view these places first-hand.
Cultural Diplomacy In The Age Of Social Media
Cultural Diplomacy Journal, 2024
Cultural diplomacy has evolved significantly with social media's rise, enabling real-time global cultural exchanges and involving non-state actors such as individuals and NGOs. This study explores social media’s impact on cultural diplomacy, focusing on effectiveness, inclusivity, and authenticity. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research includes qualitative case studies and quantitative surveys. Findings reveal that social media democratizes cultural diplomacy, fosters dynamic interactions, and enhances mutual understanding. However, challenges like the digital divide, misinformation, and cultural homogenization persist. The study suggests strategies such as robust digital literacy programs and promoting online cultural diversity to leverage social media's potential fully. This research contributes to the understanding of technology's role in international relations and offers practical recommendations for policymakers and practitioners.
Grassroots 2.0: Public Diplomacy in the Digital Age
Comunicação Pública, 2011
Rapid advancements in communication and transportation technologies in recent history have created new and emerging tools that make it possible for every individual to share information with a global audience. Social networking technologies, especially, have revolutionized the possibilities of person-to-person communication, particularly by making obsolete the geographical boundaries that once divided cultures and nationalities. Diplomacy, an international relations activity traditionally claimed as the domain of the nation-state, has become more accessible to ‘ordinary’ citizens and advocacy groups and is taking new forms as individuals and groups initiate grassroots public diplomacy activities. This paper presents the case studies of two such initiatives—Turkayfe.org and the Rediscover Rosarito Project—that have successfully implemented new communications technologies and Web 2.0 strategies in their international outreach campaigns.
Is It the Medium or the Message? Social Media, American Public Diplomacy & Iran
This article discusses communication concepts associated with the practice of public diplomacy 2.0, applying those concepts to analysis of American implementation of PD 2.0 directed toward Iran, a country with which the United States has lacked formal diplomatic relations for more than 30 years. Although interaction between the United States and the Iranian people may be limited, may not always take place in real time, and certainly cannot serve as a substitute for the interactions facilitated by a bricks-and-mortar embassy on the ground, the Virtual Embassy Tehran and its social media accouterments represent an interesting application of American public diplomacy priorities. The effort is consistent not only with the goals of 21st Century Statecraft, but also with the Administration’s stated preference for engagement while still pursuing vigorous economic sanctions toward the Iranian regime. The effort also has potent symbolic value given the United States’ promotion of global internet freedom as a foreign policy goal. The case of American engagement with the Iranian people as examined here is a unique study in the practice of public diplomacy 2.0 and it offers an opportunity to test some of the more idealistic arguments associated with application of social media to diplomatic efforts.