Interpreting the Regional Problem or Interpreting the crisis? A Critical Economic Geography perspective on uneven regional development in Greece (original) (raw)
Related papers
Economic change and regional policy in Greece
In the early 1990's Greece enters a new age of globalization and economic change, by taking part in the process of European Integration. In this new environment, economic convergence and growth are the priorities of national economic policy, while development and production issues are put aside to be tackled by the regional policy of the Union. The main argument is that, by opening up and "modernizing" the economic structure, the national regional policy in Greece is devaluated and entirely dependent on political consensus on the targeting of European cohesion. The purpose of the paper is to describe the new policy model, as it is formed under the impact of internal and external, political and economic developments that lead to crisis, and to explain its geographic implications. We conclude that regional policy is turning to efficiency and distribution and leaves "unevenness" to be handled by the market forces, in the frame of a new paradigm that is expanded all over E.U..
The 2007/08 capitalist crisis evolution in Greece. A geographical political economy perspective
Human Geography, 2022
The 2007/08 capitalist crisis severely affected the socioeconomic conditions in the majority of the developed economies. In the spatially uneven mosaic of the crisis' effects, the EU peripheral economies recorded deep recession. This paper explains why Greece is the EU country that was most acutely affected, seeking to theorize the political economy of crisis evolution. It does so, by adopting a Marxist perspective on the crisis in Greece to examine the interplay of base (structures) with superstructure (institutions), linking production with society, culture, regulation, and politics. It highlights the specificities of the Greek political economy and the particularities of the application of the neoliberal project in Greece.
European Urban and Regional Studies, 2011
The paper discusses certain issues of regional development theory in combination with long-forgotten conditions of uneven geographical development in the context of the current financial and debt crisis in the eurozone. The dominant explanations of the crisis are mainly macroeconomic and financial but this paper argues for its geographical components/ foundations. After a short descriptive comment about the current debt crisis in the eurozone and particularly in Southern Europe as part of the wider global crisis of over-accumulation, an alternative interpretation is provided based on uneven geographical/regional development among Euro-regions, especially since the introduction of the euro. The paper also discusses the shift towards what we may call the neoliberal urban and regional development discourse, which is responsible for a de-politicized shift in regional theory and hence downplaying or simply overlooking questions of socio-spatial justice. The discussion about justice and solidarity goes beyond the controversial rescue plan introduced by the European Union and the International Monetary Fund, which was supposedly designed to help one of the so-called -in a typical colonial way -PIIGS (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain), namely Greece.
Local development and forms of regulation: Fragmentation and hierarchy of spatial policies in Greece
Geoforum, Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 73–83, 1992
This article is based upon the theoretical and empirical findings of a series of research projects and debates with which the authors were either together or separately involved. The argument is built upon the assumption that the relationships between local development and the forms of regulatory policies pursued at either the local or the national level do not constitute an internally coherent and nondifferentiated framework. Rather, regulatory frameworks are seen as consisting of open-ended processes, which involve both structural and contingent elements in various combinations of contradictions and consensus, held together by their capacity to remain compatible with the requirements of social reproduction. The first section of this paper concerns the tendency of the new geography to move away from the once dominant issues of the restructuring of capital on a global scale and towards the upgrading of the locality and the specificity of place. The second section concentrates upon the Greek experience as a concrete example of policy transformation and productive restructuring, where the tensions between the opposite forces of localisation and globalisation are examined. Finally, a detailed analysis of the nature and implementation of local policies provides an illustration of the trends which have made the locality and the local state the vehicles for those fragmented forms of regulation which have emerged during the crisis and restructuring of the mode of development.
Regional distribution of industry and the role of the state in Greece
This paper is an examination of how state policies have influenced the spatial distribution of industry in Greece throughout the period after World War 2. The focus is only on those aspects of state policy that directly influence the spatial distribution of industry, that is regional policy, which was always orientated, in theory at least, towards the vague notion of the 'more even' regional development of the country. It is argued that state regional policies were not on the whole successful. The regional incentives system for industry in particular, which was the most important instrument of state regional policy, was quite inadequate, and, moreover, its cost to society increased steadily while its contribution towards a more even spatial distribution of industry was marginal. That is, the incentives system does not seem to have facilitated the regional reorganisation of industry in the sense of diminishing the spatial inequalities in the distribution of industrial activities. It was not 'accidental' that the regional incentives system, with its innate weaknesses and increasing cost, survived for so long, despite the fact that it was ineffective. Its survival can be explained in terms of the particular characteristics of Greek society, such as the predominance of the political over the economic sphere and the prevalence of clientelism in politics. In such a context the innate weaknesses of the incentives system allowed certain groups of people to enjoy economic benefits with noneconomic means.
Ersa Conference Papers, 2012
The fears of a sovereign debt crisis and the consequent lack of confidence, indicated by a widening of bond yield spreads and risk insurance of credit default swaps, have transformed a financial crisis to an economic crisis in Greece, affecting its productive bases and its income level. Up to the present time, there is no clear empirical evidence about the spatial impact of the economic crisis on Greek territory. Because of the austerity measures imposed in Greece from its lenders (i.e. the IMF and the EU counterparts), inevitably, the main focus of attention has been on national rather than regional level, although the crisis has obvious spatial aspects that should not be neglected: (a) the initial, pre-crisis, conditions (i.e. market size, accessibility, geomorphology, natural resources, productive structure) were, already, strongly differentiated among Greek regions; (b) the anti-crisis, austerity, measures taken may have significantly differentiated implications across space; (c) the implementation of spatial policies may be hindered in countries being in stressful fiscal situation. From this perspective, (further) research should be done; critical issues such as how different places are affected by the economic crisis and why, and which regions will continue to be affected, are still open. 2 The paper presents the spatial impact of the ongoing (2009-…) economic crisis in Greece, assessing the resilience and development of the Greek regions. To this end, a Composite Indicator of Regional Resilience (CIRR) and a Composite Indicator of Regional Development (CIRD) are constructed. Both Indicators include statistical data referring to a series of economic, structural, demographic and social variables. The data are derived from Hellenic Statistical Authority (EL.STAT.) and cover the period 2008-2010. The CIRR is calculated, for the whole period under consideration, as the average of the standardized growth values. The CIRD is calculated, for each year included in the period under consideration, as the average of the standardized absolute values. The calculations are conducted at the NUTS III spatial level. Both Indicators are concise, yet comprehensive, policy tools, allowing for the study of the spatial footprint of economic crisis. The findings of the paper verify that the pro-cyclical pattern of regional development in Greece, detected in periods of expansion, still exists in the period of recession.
2014
This paper contributes to the literature of economic geography by providing a first empirical confirmation of Krugman’s initial new economic geography model, in the Greek economy. A sample of Greek SMEs, drawn from four selected regions having different levels of centrality and five major industries in the 1995 – 2002 period, is found to be representative of the Greek business population, by the use of non-parametric tests. A cross-sectional model associates logarithmic SME employment growth with proxies used for capital, labour, land, industrial infrastructure, policy support, firm size, manufacturing and distance from Athens. The significance of the last three factors captures the operation of a microeconomic core-periphery model, as suggested by Krugman (1991) and agrees with a discussion on core-periphery imbalances in Greece. The latter however have not yet been diagnosed in literature by the use of models. Policy implications concerning Europe 2020 strategy relate to the need ...
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1992
Several related themes were considered: the social and spatial implications of European unification, new patterns of industrialization, urban restructuring and local politics, social inequalities and the crisis of welfare and questions of an appropriate theoretical framework with which to address these issues and in particular to identify an appropriate relationship between the state and the market in an era which had seen the expansion of neo-liberal ideologies in the West and the collapse of state socialist regimes in the East. This review only covers some of these issues.
Regional Policy in Greece of Tomorrow. The Perspectives of the Broader Regions
2006
In the frame of the European Union’s enlargement and in the search for new more cohesive and functional standards for “administrative-spatial shapes†– under the pre-conditions of competitiveness, efficiency of urban and regional development and abolition of regional inequalities for sustainable development, - noteworthy is the examination of the reconstruction of the administrative system of Regions through the introduction of