Analytic hierarchy process and bank ranking in Serbia (original) (raw)
Related papers
AHP BASED MODEL FOR BANK PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND RATING
This paper presents a multicriteria model for the bank performance evaluation. The model is based on the AHP method (Analytical Hierarchy Process), and it enables the integration of the quantitative data (measured by selected financial ratios) and qualitative data by which the bank features and some internal and external environment factors are described. The financial ratios used in the model are selected in accordance with the established results of the research on their correlation with different levels of the bank's efficiency, measured by means of Data Envelopment Analysis method. In the qualitative analysis, such features of the bank are used, which are usually included in specific analyses of the qualitative rating of banks, as well as in SWOT analysis, which is also used in the analysis of the business potential of a bank. The result of the evaluation of the sample of the Croatian banks by this model is presented.
AHP Application in Banking: Unfolding Utility in a Situation of Financial Crisis
Proceedings ISAHP2009, Creative Decision Foundation, USA, 2009
The paper reviews application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the finance sector with specific reference to banking. The paper also describes feedback from bankers’ community in Nepal on utility of AHP as a decision support tool. We have put effort to explore and demonstrate utility of AHP application in banking in the situation of global financial crisis. Despite of widespread and consistent application of AHP in business and industry, its application in banking sector is commonly initiated in the late nineties. Application of AHP in Southeast Asian countries and cases appeared in literature are observed after the regional financial crisis in mid nineties. AHP has been seen as a high potential decision support tool in banking sector in the days to come. We have also presented a bibliography of AHP application in banking in the paper.
Performance Evaluation of Commercial Banks in Nepal Using AHP
2014
This paper explores the determinants of performance exposed by the financial ratios and determines the financial performance of commercial banks in Nepal through Analytical Hierarchy Process based on their financial characteristics. The financial parameters were derived by segregating 5 major criteria which were Liquidity, Efficiency, Profitability, Capital Adequacy and Assets Quality. These criteria were further classified into 21 hierarchical sub-criteria. The performance evaluation was done for 13 commercial banks for financial data from year 2008/09 to 2011/12. The paper emphasizes financial decision problems to have strong multi criteria character and establishes priorities for performance parameters of commercial banks among financial indicators identified and ranks banks according to those indicators. This study has added one more literature to demonstrate the utility of AHP based bank evaluation to Nepalese banking community in particular, which not only evaluates the performance of banks but also gives insights to focus in the area of improvement to a particular bank in comparison to others.
Identifying and ranking financial parameters of banks using fuzzy AHP method
Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness
This study has been done with the aim to identify and rank the financial parameters of public and private banks in the North Khorasan Province. The method of this study was quantitative and cross-sectional survey and based on comparative and field study. In this research, after studying library research and studies and oral interviews, a researcher-made questionnaire was set of the financial parameters of banks. In addition, among 120 employees and 60 managers of government owned branches and privately distributed in the North Khorasan Province. To analyze the information obtained AHP technique for ranking the factors by using Expert Choice software. Results showed that an instantaneous factor with a relative weight of 0,106 is in the first rank followed by the operating cash flow attributable to operational activities with a relative weight of 0,103 ranked as the second and a long-term debt ratio with a relative weight of 0,084 ranked as the third that have importance for the finan...
Performance Evaluation Of Turkish Banks Using Analytical Hierarchy Process And Topsis Methods
can be made. Suitable performance measures can ensure that managers adopt a long-term perspective and allocate the company's resources to the most effective activities. The aim of this study is to evaluate the financial performance model of Turkish Banks during 2002-2011 periods. Both Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methodologies are used for the outranking of banks. In this study, subjective and objective opinions of financial actors turn into quantitative form with AHP.
International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 2016
Because of the Increasing competition between enterprises in the current competitive market, the importance of continuous performance evaluation in the marketplace has increased. It has become increasingly important for banks, because as a key component of the financial system, banks allocate funds from savers to borrowers in an efficient manner to support economic activities. Along with the increase of the number of private banks in Iran in recent years, competition among banks for banking activities has increased. On the other hand the presence of the private banks in the stock exchange market led to an increased sensitivity to the banks' financial performance by their shareholders. In this study, first we identified the criteria and their coefficients used for financial performance evaluation of private banks using fuzzy AHP method. After that, we evaluated financial performance of Iran private banks and ranked them using the information of the financial statements at the end of Solar Hijri year 1393 (March 2015) and TOPSIS method.
Performance Evaluation and Ranking of Turkish Private Banks Using AHP and TOPSIS
2015
Measuring performance and determining the key factors of performance have been an important research topic in different sector in recent years. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the performance ranks of the private banks in Turkey due to the fact that performances of private banks are important at the stage of economic growth. In this research, the private banks in Turkey ranked by TOPSIS method using weights of capital ratios obtained from AHP. The performance ranks of private banks sorted according to their TOPSIS scores for the period 2009-2013. In this study, capital ratios of Turkish private banks are placed in a hierarchical decision structure to establish pairwise comparisons between the model parameters which are based on the subjective judgment of a group of experts. , In order to find the performance order of the private banks in Turkey according to capital ratios, calculated criteria and sub-criteria weights for each banks by using AHP to use in TOPSIS method. Pe...
Jurma, 2023
This study aims to analyze and find out about the decision support system used to assist in analyzing potential productive financing customers using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in the Sharia Business Unit of Bank Sumut. The method that researchers use in this research is the descriptive qualitative method. Data collection was carried out through interviews with the financing division of the Sharia Business Unit of the Bank of North Sumatra and documentation. The data collected by the author of the analysis is descriptive analysis. The results found and obtained in this study are Decision Support Systems that can be used to assist in the process of analyzing data on prospective productive financing customers when applying for financing, namely by analyzing the 5C principles (Capital, Character, Capacity, Collateral, and Condition of the economy). The application of the AHP method to the Sharia Business Unit of Bank Sumut can provide the best solution in determining the feasibility of providing financing.
The aim of this study is to propose a fuzzy multi-criteria decision model to evaluate the performance of banks. Each performance evaluation model is a tool which encloses diverse information for decision makers after being performed. This specific application of these models contributes in responding the questions existing in decision makers’ minds. In this paper, the affecting criteria in two financial and non-financial levels were selected and investigated after library studies and using experts’ viewpoints. Standard questionnaires were designed and distributed among state-owned banks, partially private and private banks’ experts and high rank managers. 10 branches of each above mentioned banks were selected as a case study. The data was extracted from questionnaires and the variables were weighted using fuzzy AHP and ultimately the banks were ranked applying TOPSIS technique. Based on the findings, profitability in financial level and service quality in non-financial level have gained the greatest importance according to experts’ view points. In total ranking of management performance, private banks was placed at the first rank and partially private and private banks were ranked as the second and third, respectively. The results implied that having acceptable financial performance does not lead to having satisfactory non-financial performance spontaneously and in today’s competitive environment, managers need to observe both financial and non-financial performance in order to succeed.
Ranking Iranian Private Banks Based on the CAMELS Model Using the AHP Hybrid Approach and TOPSIS
International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 2016
This research was done to evaluate and compare performance of Iranian banks based on the CAMELS rating system. For this purpose, after studying the related literature, factors relating to efficiency and soundness were identified and used to assess banks; these were Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management Capability, Earnings, Liquidity, and Sensitivity to Market Risk. Then, an importance coefficient was determined for each of these factors using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Iranian private banks were then ranked according to evaluations on indices from audited financial statements at the end of the Solar year 1993 (March 2015) and the TOPSIS method. Results determined high-ranking banks as follows: Pasargad Bank, Khavarmiane, Karafarin, Sina and Ansar.