Rethinking gentrification concepts Cultural capital, patrimonio cultural and urban tourism in San Telmo/Buenos Aires (original) (raw)
Related papers
Lately, the housing market in the cities of advanced capitalism has undergone significant changes. New housing products and new housing formats have appeared, with their consequences on urban spatial organisation. In fact, according to a great number of authors, these changes have outlined the tendency to recentralise, but not replace the continuous non-concentration of houses and activities. Recentralisation means revaluating areas in the inner city and includes rehabilitating run-down places and re-using under-occupied areas. Furthermore, it also brings about the more permanent processes of point renovation, or zoning, all of which produces gentrification processes.
HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades, 2022
This article has deconstructed the general phenomenon of gentrification in the historic centre of A Coruña in two models. On the one hand, a model based on social class promotion, symbolic capital and economic status in the Cidade Vella. On the other hand, the neighbourhood of Orzán as a transformation process resulting from a phenomenon of commercial gentrification based on two interrelated processes: first, the demand for new places of consumption and entertainment and second, the material devaluation of the neighbourhood. In this regard, this work brings a new dimension to the global debate around commercial gentrification.
Gentrification in Spain and Latin America - A critical Dialogue
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (IJURR), 2013
Major social and political transformations such as the shift towards neoliberal urban policies have widely altered the contemporary structuring of metropolitan areas in Spain and Latin America.
Introduction: towards a C21st global gentrification studies
Handbook of Gentrification Studies
This Handbook surveys the contemporary state of play of the gentrification studies literature, a body of work that now dominates both the sub-discipline of urban geography and also urban studies more generally. It does not set out to rehearse previous debates on the definition of 'gentrification' nor does it rehearse the well-worn battlegrounds over explanations (on these see Lees, Slater and Wyly, 2008, 2010); rather this book is a collection of chapters by both long-standing and up-and-coming researchers on gentrification that represents the latest in global thinking on this process. It provides critical reviews and appraisals of the current state of, and future development of, conceptual and theoretical approaches, as well as empirical knowledge and understanding in gentrification studies. It also seeks to encourage dialogue across disciplinary boundaries, for the contributors sit in and work across geography, sociology, anthropology, planning, policy, law, and so on. The book is divided into 5 parts: Part 1 looks at recent attempts to extend and rethink gentrification as a planetary process and condition, drawing on the 'new' comparative urbanism; and a more 'earthly' take that replaces old style complementarity in gentrification studies with relationalism. Part 2 reviews the key/core concepts that have dominated gentrification studies to date, including class, landscape, rent gaps, and displacement; adding spatial capital to this list, updating them conceptually and globalizing them. Part 3 looks at other social cleavages in addition to social class, including sexualities, age, ethnicity and gender, providing ideas on future research trajectories. The cross-cutting of social cleavages in addition to social class needs fresh and deeper empirical investigation; this book seeks to instigate such an agenda. Part 4 looks at some of the different types of gentrification, including slum gentrification, new-build gentrification, public housing gentrification, tourism gentrification, retail gentrification, gentle/soft gentrification, environmental/green gentrification, the cultural economy and gentrification, and wilderness/ rural gentrification. These types of gentrification all deserve attention in their own right but can also be read together. Part 5 contains chapters on living and resisting gentrification. Unlike in most gentrification books, this part takes seriously the complexities of living with gentrification, resistance to gentrification (all types and levels of resistance) but also key to this resistance-possible alternatives to gentrification. Here readers will find some of the most comprehensive reviews of resistance in the literature to date and real attempts to find alternatives to gentrification. Although the key users of the book are likely to be advanced undergraduates, postgraduate students, and international scholars of gentrification, the chapters also have real purchase for policy makers, planners, housing activists, and indeed everyday people for whom gentrification is an issue. It is now over 50 years since the British sociologist Ruth Glass coined the term 'gentrification' in 1964.
GENTRIFICATION AND DENSIFICATION SOME REFLECTIONS PM 01 2022
With the purpose of giving a useful contribution to the next webinar's discussion, and having also in mind several shared considerations, expressed in various forums in this last period, I tried to summarize here the personal reflections, developed in recent years and further focused. The pandemic impacts are accelerating a change of the existing urban scenarios, including those related to gentrification and densification. Gentrification Among the most important aspects of the exponential urbanization of recent years, especially the great metropolis, but not only, is the progressive gentrification process that means entire neighborhoods, that were once popular, are getting inhabited by a middle-upper class, with a consequent change of their original features. It is a complex physical, social, economic and cultural phenomenon for which a city district, generally a central area, once settled by working and low-income social classes , turns into a residential area for a richest category. So zones, that first housed traditional inhabitants and urban immigrants, are getting occupied by new residents or tourists, and the previous residents are driven to city's peripheral districts, often degraded.
Latin American gentrifications - Introduction
Urban Geography, Volume 37, Issue 8, 2016
Currently, Latin American cities are seeing simultaneous processes of reinvestment and redevelopment in their historic central areas. These are not just mega-scale interventions like Porto Maravilha in Rio or Puerto Madero in Buenos Aires or the luxury renovations seen in Santa Fé or Nueva Polanco in Mexico City, they also include state-led, piecemeal, high-rise interventions in Santiago, Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro, Panamá and Bogotá, all of which are causing the displacement of original populations and thus are forms of gentrification. Until very recently, these processes have been under-conceptualized and little critiqued in Latin America, but they deserve careful scrutiny, along with new forms of neighbourhood organization, activism and resistance. In this introduction, we begin that task, drawing on the work begun in an Urban Studies Foundation-funded workshop on Global Gentrification held in Santiago, Chile in 2012. Our aim is not just to understand these urban changes and conflicts as gentrification, but to empirically test the applicability of a generic understanding of gentrification beyond the usual narratives of/from the global North. From this investigation, we hope to nurture new critical narratives, to engage sensitively with indigenous theoretical narratives and to understand the dialectical interplay between state policies, financial markets, local politics and people. The papers in this special issue deal with the core issues of state power and urban policies (exerted at metropolitan and neighbourhood scales), the enormous influx of financial investment in derelict neighbourhoods that produces exclusion and segregation, the significant loss of urban heritage from rapidly “renewing” neighbourhoods and the institutional arrangements that can enable anti-displacement activism and self-managed social housing production.
Gentrificacion Desplazamiento Desposesion Procesos Urbanos claves en America Latina
Este artículo aporta una comprensión pormenorizada de los procesos urbanos claves que se han ido perpetuando en las ciudades latinoamericanas durante los primeros tres lustros del siglo XXI y que consisten en la reconquista de las áreas centrales y peri-centrales por parte del capital inmobiliario. Esta metamorfosis de la ciudad consolidada se ha manifestado a partir del uso habitual de tres términos centrales: gentrificación, desplazamiento y desposesión. Basándose en una conceptualización del desplazamiento como proceso material, político, simbólico y psicológico, se irá fomentando una comprensión teórica de los procesos que conllevan al desplazamiento de las subjetividades abstract This article offers a detailed analysis of key urban processes that have been consolidated in different Latin American cities over the XXI century; they fundamentally consist of a reconquest of central and peri-central areas by real estate capital. The metamorphosis of the consolidated city has become apparent thanks to the regular use of three central terms: gentrification, displacement and dispossession. Through the conceptualization of the notion of displacement as a material, political, symbolic and psychological process, this paper builds a theoretical understanding of the phenomena that 31(88): 27-71, noviembre de 2016 ARTICLE: Gentrification-Displacement-Dispossession: Key Urban Processes in Latin American cities / Michael Janoschka populares de las áreas centrales y peri-centrales de las ciudades latinoamericanas. A partir de un análisis comparativista desarrollado en cinco ciudades -Ciudad de México, Buenos Aires, Río de Janeiro, Santiago de Chile y Quito-se establece una tipificación de los procesos de desplazamiento y desposesión. Esta discusión permite analizar el significado que tiene la reconfiguración territorial de cara a las injusticias espaciales, así como para los discursos en torno al "Derecho a la Ciudad", aportando por tanto una comprensión política adicional de los procesos urbanos que se consideran claves en las primeras décadas del siglo XXI.