PERSONALITY MATRIX: Toward an integrated multiple-lens theory of typology (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Myers-Briggs Personality Types
IGI Global eBooks, 2011
Just over seven years ago, I was on a flight home from the United States. Seated next to me was an IS professional coming to give training sessions on project management software that had recently been purchased by our local hydroelectric utility. Her training included an undergraduate degree in Business (IS major) and a Master's degree in Management Science. When I asked her if this educational background was adequate for her current job, she replied, almost immediately, that one area that was never covered in her studies was that she "would have to work with such different personalities." At that point, she had no idea of my occupation, specific interest in IT personalities, or the fact that three days later I would giving a workshop on personality types in IS work to a convention of IS professionals. Personality can be defined as "a complex set of relatively stable behavioral and emotional characteristics" of a person (Hohmann, 1997). It refers, essentially, to how a person functions in life. Most of us, even without any training in this area, will recognize that the world consists of people of different types. We notice that people of different types will often react differently to the same situation. But when considering personality awareness as a desirable "soft skill" for the IT profession, many of us may stop to wonder. Yes, we may say, there are different types of airline pilots, athletes, and molecular biologists. But, is this an issue that is closely connected to work? It depends on the factors of which the work consists. Most would agree that personality 701 E.
The relationship between psychological type and the three major dimensions of personality
Current Psychology, 2007
Five hundred and fifty-four undergraduate students attending a university-sector college in South Wales, United Kingdom, completed the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) (Form G) and the short-form Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. The results showed a number of statistically significant relationships between the two models of personality and drew attention to two substantively significant relationships. In Eysenckian terms, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Journal of Personality, 1989
The Myers-Bnggs Type Indicator (MBTI, Myers & McCauUey, 1985) was evaluated from the perspectives of Jung's theory of psychological types and the five-factor model of personahty as measured by self-reports and peer ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI, Costa & McCrae, 1985b) Data were provided by 267 men and 201 women ages 19 to 93 Consistent with earlier research and evaluations, there was no support for the view that the MBTI measures truly dichotomous preferences or qualitatively distmct types, instead, the instrument meastires four relatively independent dimensions The interpretation of the Judging-Pferceivmg index was also called into question The data suggest that Jung's theory is either incorrect or madequately operationalized by the MBTI and cannot provide a sound basis for interpreting it However, correlational analyses showed that the four MBTI indices did measure aspects of four of the five major dimensions of normal personality The fivefactor model provides an alternative basis for interpreting MBTI findings within a broader, more commonly shared conceptual framework 42 65 35 48 72 80 46 68
A scientific case for personality typology
2015
It is generally considered that personality-typologies are pseudo-scientific and that searching for personality-types lead to a dead end lacking any empirical evidence. The objective of this research was to research if the old assumptions were correct or not. Our conclusion is that it is scientifically possible to define personality-types and also that it is scientifically valid to assume that there exists different kinds of personality-types based on individual differences in genetic attributes.
Five Factor Constellations and Popular Personality Types
Around the coffee klatch and the water cooler, gossip often turns to control freaks, hot heads, power mongers, egomaniacs, and people with low self-esteem. The five-factor model of personality asserts that personality differences can be described by the five independent factors of openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. How do these five factors combine to create some of the popularly described personality types? Personality Zimbardo defines personality as the psychological qualities that bring continuity to an individual's behavior in different situations and at different times. It is the thread of continuity in an individual in different situations. Some theories attribute personalities to stable patterns known as traits, types, and temperaments. Traits are the stable personality characteristics that are presumed to exist within the individual and guide his or her thoughts and actions under various conditions. (Zimbardo). Not all words that describe individual behavior describe personality traits. Individuals can be described by (John 1999): • Enduring Traits such as Irascible, • Internal States such as furious, • Physical traits such as trembling, • Activities such as screaming, • Effects on others such as frightening, • Roles they play such as murderer, and • Social evaluations such as unacceptable The simple idea that humans introduce words into their language to describe interesting aspects of the world around them has led many researchers to embrace the lexical hypothesis, which states (De Raad): Those individual differences that are of most significance in the daily transactions of persons with each other will eventually become encoded into their language. The more important is such a difference, the more people will notice it and wish to talk of it, with the result that eventually they will invent a word for it. Several efforts to understand and develop a common vocabulary for describing traits begin with this lexical hypothesis. Allport and Odbert (1936 from De Raad) searched the second edition of the unabridged Webster's New International Dictionary for potential personality descriptors. They collected 17,953 terms that applied to human behavior. These words were classified into four groups representing personal traits, temporary traits, social evaluations, and metaphorical or doubtful terms. The result was a 134 page long list, including 4,504 words classified as trait terms. Cattell then collected this list of terms into groups of synonyms and antonyms, resulting in 160 categories of synonyms. He then reduced this to a list of 35 variables that are represented as bipolar trait clusters. This list is shown in Appendix A on page 9.
An Analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) in relation to the Personal Styles Matrix
Great Lakes Association for Psychological Type (GLAPT) Conference “Unlocking the Mysteries of Personality”, 2000
This paper shows how a new method of qualitative analysis, A-Priori Modal Analysis (APMA), one of the purposes of which is to determine the degree of completeness of any qualitative system, can be applied to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). APMA can specify the missing components, and thus guide further investigation, if any conceptual incompleteness is discovered. A natural by-product of the study reported here is a comparison of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator with a learning styles assessment instrument:The Personal Styles Matrix. The APMA analysis reveals the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to be an instrument constructed from two unlike concepts presented in an incompletely differentiated way. The first concept includes Feeling and Thinking as traits in a three-member set, but omits the first member -- Doing. The second concept includes three pairs of traits: Judging-Perceiving, Introvert-Extravert and Sensing-iNtuition, which are a complete set of secondary traits, created by combining all possible pairs of four primary traits. The primary traits are those referred to in the Personal Styles Matrix as Intrapersonal (Processes), Interpersonal (Structures), Social (Systems) and Cultural (Models). These primary traits are not directly expressed in the MBTI instrument, making precise specification and identification of types problematic in most cases.