Settlements of Life and Death. Studies from Prehistory to Middle Ages. Proceedings of an International Colloqium, Tulcea, 25th-28th of May 2016 (original) (raw)

Feasts, Animal Sacrifice, Deposits and Human Cadaver Manipulation at the Beginning of the First Millenium B.C. in the Lower Danube Region. The Satu Nou–Valea lui Voicu Site (Constanta County, South-East Romania)

Settlements of Life and Death. Studies from Prehistory to Middle Ages, 2016

Data on Early Iron Age at Lower Danube have substantially grown richer following the numerous researches in Babadag culture sites, especially after the ’90s. Identified in Dobrudja, eastern Walachia and south-eastern Moldavia, Babadag culture has ascribed so far over 100 settlements that probably functioned from the end of 11th c. to the first part of 8th c. B.C. One of the problems raised since the beginning of investigations at Babadag was the lack of information regarding the existence of necropolises. From the ’90s, but especially in the past decade, data regarding the treatment of the dead was completed with several outstanding finds, results of complicated deposition/decomposition and manipulation of human bodies in settlements. Thus, numerous habitat structures (pits, huts, ditches) containing human bones were found in settlements such as Babadag, Niculiţel, Suceveni, Garvăn, Jurilovca – Orgame or Bucu. Though several synthetic studies have already been published concerning these finds that many researchers consider atypical, unusual, bizarre or macabre burials, the recent discoveries continue to bring to light new pieces of information confirming the complexity of this special funerary conduct. Such is the case of the site at Satu Nou-Valea lui Voicu (Oltina, Constanta County), located on a greatly eroded promontory in the immediate proximity of the Danube. Archaeological research in 1982-2002 documented the existence of an important fortified Getae settlement (3rd-1st c. BC). Archaeological deposits exceeded 5 m in depth in the northern plateau and encompassed 9 layers. The remains of a possible EIA sanctuary ascribed to Babadag culture (9th–early 8th c. BC) were partially investigated beneath the Late Iron Age settlement. The complex consisted of several pits and one ditch that followed the western limit of the promontory. Skeletons or parts of human and animal skeletons, along with stones, pottery, etc. were deposited there. Such practices of exposure-decomposition-manipulation or inhumation-exhumation applied to the human body after death are often encountered in EIA in the Carpathians-Balkans areal and beyond.

Mihai Gligor, Kirsty McLeod, Ana Fetcu and Călin Şuteu (2023): A ditch in time: A bioarchaeological analysis of the human skeletal remains discovered at Alba Iulia – Lumea Nouă (Romania)

Homines, Funera, Astra 3-4: The Multiple Faces, Oxford, Archaeopress of Death and Burial, 2023

Meeting a medieval community of Bizere Monastery: lifestyle, occupation and nutritional status ……………… Luminița Andreica-Szilágyi Disappearance of grave goods: changes in burial practices in 14 th century Ivanec, Croatia ……………………………. Juraj Belaj and Filomena Sirovica Can the position of the forearms serve as a dating determinant in medieval and early modern cemeteries on the territory of the northern Croatia? …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Siniša Krznar Coin finds at Crkvari-Saint Lawrence Church site (northern Croatia) as terminus ante quem non for funerary features ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Tatjana Tkalčec

Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica 23/2 (December 2017)

2017

Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica 23/2 (December 2017) http://saa.uaic.ro/issues/xxiii-2/ CUPRINS – CONTENTS – SOMMAIRE ARTICLES — Felix Adrian TENCARIU, Măriuca VORNICU, Andrei ASĂNDULESEI, Loredana SOLCAN, George BODI, Casandra BRAȘOVEANU Investigating a Chalcolithic dwelling at Isaiia, Iași County, Romania — Policarp HORTOLÀ From antiquities to memorabilia: a standardised terminology for ancestral artefacts according to manufacture date — Florica MĂȚĂU, Ana-Lavinia MATRICALĂ, Adrian BELE, Ioana RUSU, Dragoș Lucian GORGAN, Neculai BOLOHAN Diagenetic analysis and historical interpretations. Case studies from eastern Romania — Sergey M. ZHESTOKANOV The mysterious expedition of Thrasybulus of Miletus — E. Deniz OĞUZ-KIRCA, Ioannis LIRITZIS Chasing Hygassos (Anatolia): Settlement under epigraphic evidence — Oleg KLIMOV The Greek culture of dialogue and of political decision-making process at Hellenistic Kings’ court — Arina BRAGOVA Cicero on the gods and Roman religious practices — Iulian MOGA Jewish society and family tradition in funerary inscriptions — Lucrețiu MIHAILESCU-BÎRLIBA La population dans les villages situés entre Sacidava et Axiopolis — Eugene AFONASIN Neoplatonic Asclepius: Science and religion at the crossroads of Aristotelian biology, Hippocratic medicine and Platonic theurgy — Valerii KAVRUK, Roxana-Gabriela CURCĂ A new exploratory project: The ethnoarchaeology of salt in the Inner Carpathian area of Romania REVIEWS — Victor Sava, Neolithic and Eneolithic in the Lower Mureș Basin (Ana DROB) — Blas Román Castellón Huerta, Cuando la sal era una joya. Antropología, arqueología y tecnología de la sal durante el Posclásico en Zapotitlán Salinas, Puebla (Mihaela ASĂNDULESEI)

Human Remains from the Mesolithic to the Chalcolithic Period in Southern Romania. An Update on the Discoveries

Archaeologia Bulgarica, 2012

The main purpose of this material was to update older synthesis and to lay the ground for new angles of viewing the human remains. We first defined the categories in which we considered to divide the discoveries. We used the spatial factor as defining trait, putting thus the accent on the larger (spatial) context of burials and other human remains rather than on features that are specific to burials by themselves (such as treatment of the body, grave goods, etc.). We catalogued and mapped 75 sites from Southern Romania where human remains were discovered, and in the end we present an overview of the data, and highlight some of the major constants and changes in the disposal of a dead body that occurred in the interval between the Mesolithic and the Chalcolithic periods. The number of finds per period, per area or per culture is too heterogeneous to draw any final conclusions. We could notice how regional or personal interest led to different quantity and quality of the published data. The synthesis of the information could, none the less, lead to some observations regarding possible patterns in the spatial relationship between the living and the dead. The deceased seemed to have played an important role in the communities, their presence close to the living being a permanent marker even when and where cemeteries were used for the burials.