The Abrahamic Faiths? Continuity and Discontinuity in Christian and Islamic Doctrine (original) (raw)
Related papers
Reviews in religion and theology, 2019
The aim of this rich and complex interdisciplinary handbook is 'to contribute to the emergence and development of the comparative study of the Abrahamic religions' (p. xiii). The editors of the volume, Adam Silverstein from Bar Ilan University and Guy Stroumsa and Moshe Blidstein (general editor), both from Hebrew University in Jerusalem, have collected authoritative studies both critical and supportive on the very concept of the Abrahamic religions focusing on a variety of topics dealing comparatively with Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: 'Underpinning is the assumption that there is something to be gained from studying these religious traditions together' (p. xiii). The assumptions are that there is a common set of questions about God and his world what brings both, on the hand, the Abrahamic religions together and, on the other hand, distinguishes them from each other as to their answers to these questions. For the editors, the point of comparative study of the Abrahamic religions is 'to illuminate our understanding of each individual religion by situating it appropriately in its spiritual, social, and historic context(s)' (p. xv). It is not too early to say that this eager goal is achieved: thirty-two contributions engage in the subject from different angles, focusing, firstly, on the histories, examinations, and criticisms of the very concept of the Abrahamic religions, and moving, secondly, to the historic perspective on the interactions between Jewish, Christian, and Islamic communities. The third part explores issues central to the practice and thought of all three religions, such as the value of scripture and its interpretations throughout history, while the fourth turns to issues of religious thought and philosophy, particularly discussing the great thinkers of the Abrahamic religions in the Middle Ages. Part Five focuses on comparisons and interactions in the realm of praxis and ethics, and the concluding Part Six comprises three epilogues compiled by authoritative theologians from the viewpoint of each of the religions, namely, Peter Ochs, David Ford, and Tariq Ramadan. There are a number of underlying themes discussed and a variety of problems tackled throughout the book. Many contributions in the first chapters of the handbook discuss, though from different angles, the key problems of the authenticity of Abraham, the Abrahamic religion(s) or
Religion Compass
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have long been known as "Abrahamic religions," and the comparative study of these three religious traditions has occupied scholars focusing on a variety of time periods from antiquity to modernity. Recent research has begun to question, or at least to complicate , the label "Abrahamic religions," opening up a host of new avenues of inquiry when examining the history and development of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. In this article , I explore the relationship between popular and scholarly modes of understanding these religions. I examine the role of religious competition as a framework through which to research Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. I offer concluding thoughts regarding why this framework is beneficial not only to scholars of religion but also to lay readers for understanding why this field of comparative scholarship matters to them.
THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS: PHILOSOPHY-THEOLOGY-MYSTICISM
This pdf file contains a proposed 2nd revised and corrected edition of my book Christianity and Islam: Essays on Ontology and Archetype, published in London by The Matheson Trust in 2010. (The Matheson Trust retains the copyright to the original 2010 edition). For this proposed revised edition I have chosen the new title The Abrahamic Religions: Philosophy—Theology — Mysticism.
Exploring the Abrahamic religions, 2020
Divided into three distinct parts, this essay principally states that the Abrahamic faiths, and particularly the Catholic Church, are theologically static, but undergoing constant pastoral and ecclesiastical change. To explore the validity of this statement, examples will be provided to cover the three aspects of the question. A critical examination will thoroughly explore, firstly, the revelations that play a fundamental role in the theology of the Abrahamic religions. By measuring the extent to which the Abrahamic faiths are dependent upon revelation for their continued existence, we will pinpoint whether these revelations are truly binding. This, followed by an exploration of the actions and policies of different denominations to keep revelations intact and then by an overview of the different types of revelations and revelatory sources, will solidly answer the first aspect of the question at hand. Secondly, we will explore whether the doctrinal developments of the Abrahamic faiths are alterable with examples from historical and contemporary events to support the proposed argument. Examining aspects particularly from within the Catholic Church and between different Christian denominations will allow for a clear conclusion on whether the doctrines of a particular church can be considered as unalterable or otherwise binding. Thirdly and finally, the theologies of each of the three major Abrahamic religions – Christianity, Judaism, and Islam – will be analysed in the context of modernity. This will be followed with examples of the difficulties that each has faced in the modern world with a view to identify whether their doctrines are firstly re-interpretable in a modern context, whether it is fair that they are interpreted in this way, and the resulting consequences for each of the religions if such reinterpretations are popular and successfully established.
THE SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS
IJASOS - International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences Archive Volume 4, Issue 11, 2018
Our research has surveyed the philological origins of the word "science" and "religion". Furthermore, it has reexamined the definitions of "The Science of Religion" and "The Science of Comparative Religion". Building on this foundation, the author compared the major similarities and differences between the Jewish, Christian and Islamic Religions, especially via the lens of Monotheism, exploring the Jewish Shema, Christian Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed, and Islam"s Tawheed. This new research aims to contribute to a better understanding of our three major monotheistic religions.
STUDIES IN INTERRELIGioUS DIALGGUE 12 2 ؛2002( should all feel comfortable. The second, and related, reason seems to be the desire to address other factors that unite these three religions, beyond their common belief in one God. Reference to the three religions as 'Abrahamic' provides a sense of common history, or at least common story, and a common spiritual paternity. Based on this common paternity, the three religions should be classified together not only on accoimt of their interrelated history of dialogue, dispute. Nor support and competition, primarily in the West, for nearly a millennium and a half. It is not only theologically that they are similar, as 'monotheistic' might suggest. Rather, by classifying them as 'Abrahamic' the suggestion is made that the three religions form a family within the wider body of humanity's religions. Consequently, the three religions can be spoken of as 'Children of Abraham'.' The establishment of this family relationship does not stem so much from a history-of-religions type enquiry but from the implied understanding that both past behavior and the call for better future behavior in their mutaal relations should be appreciated in light of the recognition of a family relationship. In an atmosphere of interfaith cooperation, the designation 'Abrahamic' emerges carrying within it the suggestion not only of a shared story, but also of an ideal harmonious relationship that should characterize adherents of the three faiths, emanating, as it were, from a common branch.
Abraham's Legacy: Togetherness of Christian and Islamic Faith
Jurnal Theologia, 2022
This article is a studio about Abraham, known as the ancestor obtained by Isaac and Ishmael. His offspring are already widespread. With all the inheritance given to them, get Abraham to start life in a different land and with different blessings. Here is the crucial point. The difference seems to have proved the fact that as a result of Abraham coming from fellowship and brotherhood remain intertwined and maintained, because these two things are also Abraham's legacy. Through literature studies, some data about Abraham are described in a narrative manner with the aim of being based on Abraham's inheritance, namely blessings, descent and land implemented correctly and proportionally. What is presented in this review article on two dimensions of inheritance: spiritual and community. Spiritual, from a biblical perspective, speaks of a promise, while the community is more towards the vision of sociology and managerial pluralism.
Religious Dualism and the Abrahamic Religions
The Oxford Handbook of the Abrahamic Religions Edited by Adam J. Silverstein and Guy G. Stroumsa, 2015
The problem of the nature and dynamics of the interrelations between traditions of religious dualism and Judaism, Christianity, and Islam is of major importance for the exploration and understanding of some of the characteristic theological tensions and polemics within the Abrahamic religions. It also has significant implications for the investigation of and gaining new insight into the processes of the construction of their normative orthodoxies, especially in the spheres of devising strategies of defining and refuting doctrinal error, heterodoxy, and heresy. This chapter discusses the history of the study of dualism in religion, various typologies and definitions developed to map and analyse various types of dualism, and the roles played by dualistic ideas and influences in the history of the Abrahamic religions.