‘Aeschylus in Byzantium’, in R. Kennedy (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aeschylus, Leiden; Boston: Brill 2017, 179-202. (original) (raw)
Aeschylus was rather less known in Byzantium than Euripides and Sophocles, but was nonetheless read at schools and there survive several references, citations and allusions in a variety of texts. A selection of three plays, Prometheus Vinctus, Septem contra Thebas, and Persae, the so-called ‘Byzantine triad’, is found in many more manuscripts than the rest, often with marginal commentaries for school use. The manuscript transmission is not good for the rest of the plays and there are cases where it is impossible to recover what Aeschylus wrote. There are also a number of variant readings that are difficult to evaluate, and it is unclear if these are ancient or simply the conjectures of Byzantine scholars. Modern scholars sometimes allow for two incompatible views: a very limited number of independent witnesses throughout Byzantium and, at the same time, a significant number of variant readings which they do not assign to Byzantine scholars. Demetrius Triclinius (fourteenth century) was the leading Byzantine scholar on Greek tragedy and made an original and lasting contribution to the textual criticism of Aeschylus. Some early Church Fathers (e.g., St Basil, Theodoret of Cyrus) refer positively to Aeschylus’ grandiloquence, while later Byzantine scholars (Michael Psellus, John Tzetzes) consider Aeschylus difficult and obscure. Psellus (eleventh century) anticipated some of the arguments used recently to challenge the authenticity of Prometheus. Eustathius of Thessalonica (twelfth century) is the first to report that the Byzantine political verse was thought to be similar to some trochaic tetrameter catalectics found in Persae. Several Byzantine authors, mostly from the twelfth century, cite or allude to Aeschylean lines. Such allusions are usually linguistic borrowings intended to impress a learned audience and they are not meaningful in an intertextual way. Some Aeschylean phrases also became proverbial (sometimes already in Late Antiquity) and occur in several Byzantine authors.
Related papers
The Tragedies from a Byzantine Perspective: Book Epigrams on Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides
Medioevo greco 19, 2019
The present article contributes to the understanding of the reception of ancient drama in Byzantium by examining a wide range of book epigrams, that accompany the classical tragedies in Byzantine manuscripts. These epigrams –hypotheseis, encomiastic poems, verse scholia, titles and colophons– are mostly related to the so-called triads, the set of tragedies used in the Byzantine school curriculum. The article begins with an introduction on the main characteristics of the book epigrams (section I), continues with three sections dedicated to Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides (sections II-IV) and ends with one section on the short epigrams marking the ending of the tragedies in the manuscripts (section V). The article offers short overviews of the book epigrams attached to the work of each tragedian and discusses a number of remarkable examples, providing insight into Byzantine reader responses to ancient drama.
De Gruyter , 2020
Classics, Computer Science, and Linguistics are brought together in this book, in an attempt to provide an answer to the authorship question concerning "Prometheus Bound" by applying Stylometry and techniques of non-traditional Authorship Attribution. The analysis indicates a significant distance between the disputed text and the secure plays of Aeschylus, but also interesting affinities with other authors, especially Sophocles and Euripides. Reviews The Classical Review: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/classical-review/article/abs/authorship-of-prometheus-bound-n-manousakis-prometheus-bound-a-separate-authorial-trace-in-the-aeschylean-corpus-trends-in-classics-supplementary-volume-98-pp-xvi-282-figs-berlin-and-boston-de-gruyter-2020-cased-109-11995-isbn-9783110687644/5A6333A0E3B094ECE9682B8A613CABF6 Greece & Rome: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/greece-and-rome/article/abs/greek-literature/7153F33E904F33251B922AF514513676 Bryn Mawr Classical Review: https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2021/2021.04.10/
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.