Representing Rome: Analyzing a Giacomo Lauro Print as a Window to the Past (original) (raw)

Abstract

Representation has been a contested topic within the field of art history for decades, grappling with the authenticity and independence of representation from its subject. Bringing in the ideas of E.H. Gombrich, David Summers, and philosophers such as Descartes, the concept of representations as original works of imagination and independent creativity are explored. Using the 1625 Giacomo Lauro print entitled Claudi Et Traiani Impp Admirabum Portuv Ostien Sciogria as a case study, this essay regards the print and its history, first addressing its content and then analyzing it as a work of representation, while contending with its historical inaccuracies. Viewing the print as a map to the Roman port, the ideas of Roman supremacy and nationalism, and Lauro’s own mind, one can trace back the meanings and decode the messages embedded in the engraving. Following Summer’s ideas of representation as communication, an attempt is made at unpacking the print from its historic context into the modern day, analyzing its value as a historic record of the time and place of its creation as well as the sentiments of its creator. The print, as well as the book Splendore Dell’Antica Roma Nel Quale si Rappresenta as a whole, is analyzed as a 17th century object, factoring in its role as a text created to honor Rome and the 1625 Jubilee of Urban VIII. Also bringing in the tradition of mapmaking as a method of understanding the world in contrast with the lack of accuracy in the depiction of the Port of Augustus found in the print, these issues are faced within the spectrum of representation and understood under a 21st century lens. Invoking conversation between viewers and creators, the concept of representation as intermediary is discussed, attempting to pin down its place between the subject, the viewer, and the mental images the representation invokes.

Key takeaways

sparkles

AI

  1. The text analyzes Giacomo Lauro's 1625 print as a complex representation of Rome's historical and cultural significance.
  2. Representation in art history, particularly Lauro's work, faces ongoing debates regarding authenticity and accuracy.
  3. Lauro's print serves as a communication tool reflecting Roman supremacy and nationalism of the 17th century.
  4. The print's dimensions are 28.9 cm by 21.5 cm, with the image measuring 23.7 cm by 18.1 cm.
  5. Philosophers like Descartes and Gombrich influence the understanding of representation as independent from its subject.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (15)

  1. McCarthy ! 25 Bibliography:
  2. Bryan, Michael. Dictionary of Painters and Engravers: Biographical and Critical. Vol. 2. ed. Robert Edmund Graves and Sir Walter Armstrong. London: G. Bell and Sons, 1889.
  3. Damisch, Hubert. "Semiotics and Iconography." In The Art of Art History: A Critical Anthology, edited by Donald Preziosi, 234-241. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
  4. Delbecke, Maarten. "Framing History: The Jubilee of 1625, the Dedication of the New Saint Peter's and the Baldacchino." In Festival Architecture, ed. Sarah Bonnemaison and Christine Macy, 129-154. The Classical Tradition in Architecture. New York, London: Rutledge, 2008.
  5. "Giacomo Lauro, Antiquae Urbis Splendor," n.d. Brown University.
  6. Gombrich, E.H. "Ambiguities of the Third Dimension." In Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, 242-87. New York: Pantheon Books, 1960.
  7. Grove Encyclopedia of Materials & Techniques in Art. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  8. Hohlfelder, Robert L. "Anastasius I, Mud, and Foraminifera: Conflicting Views of Caesarea Maritima's Harbor in Late Antiquity." Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 317 (2000): 41-62.
  9. Keay, Simon. "Portus: Rome's Other Port." Current World Archaeology, no. 20 (November 2006): 11-20.
  10. Lauro, Giacomo. Splendore Dell'Antica Roma Nel Quale si Rappresenta. 2nd ed. Rome: Nell Stamperia di Andrea Fei, 1625. McCarthy ! 26
  11. "Portus." Encyclopedia Britannica, Britannica Academic, n.d.
  12. Preziosi, Donald. "Mechanisms of Meaning: Iconography and Semiology." In The Art of Art History: A Critical Anthology, edited by Donald Preziosi, 227-233. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
  13. Rutledge, Steven H. Ancient Rome as a Museum: Power, Identity, and the Culture of Collecting. 1st ed. Oxford Studies in Ancient Culture and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  14. Summers, David. "Representation." In Critical Terms for Art History, edited by Robert S. Nelson and Richard Shiff, 3-19. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.
  15. Wood, Christopher S. "Art History Review VI: E.H. Gombrich's 'Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation.'" The Burlington Magazine, December 2009.