Historiography and Hagiographic Texts The Syriac Versions of Palladius' Historia Lausiaca (original) (raw)

The Laudatio Therapontis: a neglected source of the later seventh or early eighth centuries (2007)

Averil Cameron's contribution to discussions about the character of, and inspiration behind, some important genres of Byzantine literature in the period from the sixth to eighth century has been fundamental to a re-appraisal and re-evaluation of much theological or theologically-related writing from this period 1. In this short contribution I want to acknowledge the importance of that work by looking at a text which forms part of a limited but important body of material, and which throws valuable light on beliefs, attitudes and the concerns of Constantinopolitan society in the seventh and early eighth centuries, a representative of just the sort of writing with which her work has been concerned. Collections of miracles offer some of the most valuable insights into the attitudes and beliefs of ordinary people, and those produced in the course of the seventh and eighth centuries take on an added significance when the changing situation of the eastern Roman empire in the face of first Persian and later Arab Islamic conquests are taken into account. In particular the tension between two competing traditions of causal explanation , in which the role of human freedom of choice and of direct divine intervention in human affairs were sharply contrasted, became especially pointed at this time, and in the context of a debate about the efficacity of the saints and their relics, on the one hand, and of sacred images, on the other, which came to occupy a central place in the theological and political debates of the eighth and ninth centuries 2. How

In Margins of the Syriac Liturgical Manuscripts (text of the presentation)

Workshop: "Colophons in Middle Eastern Manuscripts", Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton University, 2021

Syriac Liturgical manuscripts are not only distinguished with their rich diversity of texts (which still, many of these texts are unedited and even unidentified); but in addition, they include many marginal notes and colophons which provide some highly important historical records to inform us about: events, dates, names of places and persons, families, the life of the church community, endowments, wars, refugees, migrations, conflicts, letters, pandemics, etc… This paper will study several colophons from the Syriac liturgical manuscripts, to draw attention to the importance of these manuscripts in the daily life of the Syriac communities, since they were available with direct access inside their churches (the centers of their community life). Moreover, it will suggest constructing a comprehensive corpus to collect and analyze these colophons (written mainly in Arabic, Syriac, and Garshuni), which can contribute to providing new and further sources to be employed in systematic studies in social history.

Narrating History Through the Bible in Late Antiquity: A Reading Community for the Syriac Peshitta Old Testament Manuscript in Milan (Ambrosian Library, B. 21 inf.) (Full Text)

The Codex Ambrosianus stands as the most influential Syriac biblical codex for the Peshitta Old Testament. Yet only in recent years have scholars analyzed it as a material object owned and used by religious communities. This article offers as yet the fullest treatment of the codex as a material object. Attention to the historical ordering of the books in this codex suggests how the creators of this manuscript ordered the final ten books, which include remarkably Book 6 of Josephus’ Jewish War. The late-sixth- or early-seventh-century dating of this manuscript, reevaluated and reaffirmed at the beginning of the essay, helps coordinate the ordering of this codex with the widespread interest in historical writings in Syriac communities from this time. The Codex Ambrosianus would have served the interests of reading communities from this milieu well. This article thus offers insight into the use of the manuscript and the materials available to late antique reading communities. It also contributes to broader efforts in early Christian studies to relate manuscripts to the communities that used them and to understand reading practices and book culture in late antiquity. Philip Michael Forness, “Narrating History Through the Bible in Late Antiquity: A Reading Community for the Syriac Peshitta Old Testament Manuscript in Milan (Ambrosian Library, B. 21 inf.),” Le Muséon 127, no. 1–2 (2014): 41–76.

The Context of Production of the Vatican Manuscript of the Syriac Life of Symeon the Stylite

Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies, 2018

This article identifies the place and institutional context of production of Vatican Syriac Manuscript 160, ff. 1-79. It argues that the priest Simeon of Marimîn and the archdeacon Cyrus oversaw the production of the Vatican manuscript’s version of the Syriac Life of Symeon the Stylite as well as the construction of a hostel (pandocheion) in Telneshe in the 470s. The two expenditures were part of a broader project of promoting pilgrimage to Symeon’s cult site. Since this manuscript contains either the autograph or an extraordinarily early version of the Syriac Life of Symeon, locating the manuscript’s place and institutional context of production clarifies the rhetorical project of this manuscript’s version of the Syriac Life of Symeon. In addition, the Vatican manuscript represents our fifth earliest dated Syriac manuscript. A sound assessment of the manuscript’s place of production contributes to our understanding of fifth-century Syriac paleography, orthography, and manuscript production. Finally, this article provides an early case in which the composition of a saint’s life is clearly connected with the economic organization that characterizes a saint’s cult.

The Old Syriac Versions of the Gospels. A Status Quaestionis (From 1842 to the Present Day)

Bulletin de l’Académie Belge pour l’Étude des Langues Anciennes et Orientales

After having presented the manuscripts of the Old Syriac version of the Gospels and the editions of the witnesses (Sinaiticus, Curetonian, and the newly discovered Sinaitic palimpsests), this article demonstrates in what respect all these witnesses are reflections of a single translation. It then goes on to deal with the thorny question of its date and its milieu of origin, going through the various arguments that have been made: the historical arguments, the analysis of quotations of the Old Syriac, the study of the relationship with the other versions (Old Testament Peshitta and the Diatessaron) and the analysis of its language and its “linguistic anomalies.” The last part of the article is devoted to the relationship between the Old Syriac and the Greek text of the Gospels. Although today most scholars agree that it is hazardous to try and provide a retroversion into Greek, it is however possible, under certain conditions, to identify the Greek text type which served as a model. ...

Alice-Mary Talbot, ed., Byzantine Defenders of Images. Eight Saints' Lives in English Translation

Speculum, 2002

In this second volume of the Dumbarton Oaks series Byzantine Saints' Lives in Translation, as in the first, Holy Women of Byzantium: Ten Saints' Lives in English Translation, Alice-Mary Talbot capitalizes on the benefits of a unifying theme to produce a wonderfully useful volume. The eight saints' lives in this volume are divided evenly between the first period of iconoclasm (726-87), inaugurated by the Byzantine emperor Leo III, and the second (815-43), inaugurated by Leo V the Armenian. The contents of the two parts are very disparate in length and nature, however. Four brief notices from the Synaxarion of Constantinople (24 pages) represent the four saints of the first period: Theodosia of Constantinople (synaxarion for 18 July, Bibliotheca hagiographica Graeca [BHG] 1774e); Stephen the Younger (28 November); Anthousa of Mantineon (27 July, BHG Auctarium 2029h); and Anthousa, daughter of the Byzantine emperor Constantine V (12 April). By contrast, the second period is represented by extensive documents of diverse character: the life of Patriarch Nikephoros I by the repentant Ignatios, deacon and skeuophylax of the Church of St. Sophia in Constantinople (BHG 1335, 102 pages); the anonymous life of Sts. David, Symeon, and George of Lesbos, in fact a composite of multiple sources about historically unrelated figures (BHG 2163, 102 pages); the life of Ioannikios by the monk Peter (BHG 936, 97 pages); and the life with encomium of Empress Theodora (BHG 1731, 22 pages). The editor attributes this imbalance to the paucity of hagiographical sources about the first period, the fact that no accounts were actually written in the first period, and the fact that a new edition of the Vita of St. Stephen the Younger, the major extensive hagiographical text pertaining to the first period of iconoclasm, is currently in press. The four short pieces from the Constantinopolitan synaxarion representing the first period of iconoclasm capture the retrospective assessment of the controversy that prevailed in the capital in the tenth century. They introduce the reader to the iconodule traditions that sustained the opposition to iconoclasm in the documents from the second period, while their editors' introductions place those later documents in perspective. The historical material provided in the introductions and notes are rich in reference to current research, bringing out the role that women played in resistance to iconoclasm and providing critical perspective on such issues as double monasteries and the persistent tensions between monastic leaders and the ecclesiastical hierarchy. The four pieces representing the second period of iconoclasm offer very different contributions to this volume. Elizabeth Fisher's introduction to the Vita of Patriarch Nikephoros I (758-828) is a little gem of historiography, accounting for the bitter hostility evidenced in the Vita between Nikephoros and the ecclesiastical hierarchy, on the one hand, and, on the other, the Stoudite monks, who ought to have been his allies in their common opposition to iconoclasm. Fisher steers us through a labyrinth of political issues, including the elevation of Nikephoros, a layman, through a series of rapid ordinations to the patriarchate at the behest of Emperor Nikephoros I and over the objections of the Constantinopolitan Stoudios monastery; revocation of the earlier excommunication of a loyal courtier who had divorced and remarried contrary to canon law, again over the objections of the Stoudite monks; the emperor's exile of the Stoudite leader, Theodore, in the fourth year of Nikephoros's patriarchate; and Nikephoros's opposition to double monasteries. On the literary side, Fisher relates the remarkable overview of the Byzantine curriculum in higher education and the Socratic dialogue between the patriarch and the iconoclast emperor Leo V, both embedded in the Vita, to the ornate and archaic literary style of this work, preparing the reader for the Homeric allusions and vocabulary scattered through the text.

Alice-Mary Talbot, editor., Byzantine Defenders of Images. Eight Saints' Lives in English Translation

Speculum, 2002

In this second volume of the Dumbarton Oaks series Byzantine Saints' Lives in Translation, as in the first, Holy Women of Byzantium: Ten Saints' Lives in English Translation, Alice-Mary Talbot capitalizes on the benefits of a unifying theme to produce a wonderfully useful volume. The eight saints' lives in this volume are divided evenly between the first period of iconoclasm (726-87), inaugurated by the Byzantine emperor Leo III, and the second (815-43), inaugurated by Leo V the Armenian. The contents of the two parts are very disparate in length and nature, however. Four brief notices from the Synaxarion of Constantinople (24 pages) represent the four saints of the first period: Theodosia of Constantinople (synaxarion for 18 July, Bibliotheca hagiographica Graeca [BHG] 1774e); Stephen the Younger (28 November); Anthousa of Mantineon (27 July, BHG Auctarium 2029h); and Anthousa, daughter of the Byzantine emperor Constantine V (12 April). By contrast, the second period is represented by extensive documents of diverse character: the life of Patriarch Nikephoros I by the repentant Ignatios, deacon and skeuophylax of the Church of St. Sophia in Constantinople (BHG 1335, 102 pages); the anonymous life of Sts. David, Symeon, and George of Lesbos, in fact a composite of multiple sources about historically unrelated figures (BHG 2163, 102 pages); the life of Ioannikios by the monk Peter (BHG 936, 97 pages); and the life with encomium of Empress Theodora (BHG 1731, 22 pages). The editor attributes this imbalance to the paucity of hagiographical sources about the first period, the fact that no accounts were actually written in the first period, and the fact that a new edition of the Vita of St. Stephen the Younger, the major extensive hagiographical text pertaining to the first period of iconoclasm, is currently in press. The four short pieces from the Constantinopolitan synaxarion representing the first period of iconoclasm capture the retrospective assessment of the controversy that prevailed in the capital in the tenth century. They introduce the reader to the iconodule traditions that sustained the opposition to iconoclasm in the documents from the second period, while their editors' introductions place those later documents in perspective. The historical material provided in the introductions and notes are rich in reference to current research, bringing out the role that women played in resistance to iconoclasm and providing critical perspective on such issues as double monasteries and the persistent tensions between monastic leaders and the ecclesiastical hierarchy. The four pieces representing the second period of iconoclasm offer very different contributions to this volume. Elizabeth Fisher's introduction to the Vita of Patriarch Nikephoros I (758-828) is a little gem of historiography, accounting for the bitter hostility evidenced in the Vita between Nikephoros and the ecclesiastical hierarchy, on the one hand, and, on the other, the Stoudite monks, who ought to have been his allies in their common opposition to iconoclasm. Fisher steers us through a labyrinth of political issues, including the elevation of Nikephoros, a layman, through a series of rapid ordinations to the patriarchate at the behest of Emperor Nikephoros I and over the objections of the Constantinopolitan Stoudios monastery; revocation of the earlier excommunication of a loyal courtier who had divorced and remarried contrary to canon law, again over the objections of the Stoudite monks; the emperor's exile of the Stoudite leader, Theodore, in the fourth year of Nikephoros's patriarchate; and Nikephoros's opposition to double monasteries. On the literary side, Fisher relates the remarkable overview of the Byzantine curriculum in higher education and the Socratic dialogue between the patriarch and the iconoclast emperor Leo V, both embedded in the Vita, to the ornate and archaic literary style of this work, preparing the reader for the Homeric allusions and vocabulary scattered through the text.