Черный передел: Вольтер в изданиях петербургского издательства «Пантеон» (1907–1912) = Black Repartition: Voltaire in editions of The Pantheon publishing house (1907–1912) in St. Petersburg (original) (raw)

(Lebedev A. Saint Philaret and the 1861 Manifesto / trans. from fr. Lyutko E.) Лебедев А. Святитель Филарет и Манифест от 19 октября 1861 года [перевод с фр. Лютько Е.]

Lebedev A. Philarète de Moscou. La parole d’un svjatitel’ au dix-neuvième siècle en Russie. Thèse de doctorat nouveau régime. Paris : École des hautes études en science sociale, 2007. P. 324–351.

The text published here is extracted from French researcher Andrei Lebedev's thesis, «The word of the «svjatitel' in 19th-century Russia». The author examines the role of mitropolitan Philaret (Drozdov) in the preparation and realization/enactment of the Emancipation Reform of 1861, and subjects the text of the Manifesto of 19 February 1861 to a theological analysis, identifying therein the key categories of St. Philaret’s theology. Lebedev concludes that the relationship of the various currents in Russian intellectual society to the Manifesto can in fact be identified with their general position towards the Russian Church. Keywords: saint Philaret (Drozdov), Reform of the 1861, Russian society in XIXth century, sacralization of the monarchy

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Plato, als Mitgenosse einer christlicher Offenbarung / Plato as Party to a Christian Revelation. A Russian translation, with introduction, by A. Garadja / Иоганн Вольфганг Гёте. Платон как товарищ христианскому откровению. Пер. с нем. и введение А. Гараджи. (in Russian)

Platonic Investigations / Платоновские исследования, 2016

Platonic Investigations 4.1 (2016): 216–223. The publication presents a new Russian translation, with a brief Introduction, of a note by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe entitled Plato, als Mitgenosse einer christlicher Offenbarung (1796). Declaiming against self-righteous Christian appropriation of Plato, Goethe identifies his dialogue Ion as a ‘sheer mockery’ (persiflage) on the part of Plato the writer, and at the same time emphasizes the value of Aristophanes for his adequate understanding. These points, writing-in-mockery and the stress on Aristophanes, are also characteristic of the so-called dramatic approach to Plato's works.