Mites de fundació de ciutats al món antic (Mesopotamia, Grecia i Roma (original) (raw)
Related papers
Los retratos masculinos de personajes ilustres de la Antigüedad desempeñaron un papel destacado en las colecciones de escultura de tradición anticuaria. Las series de los doce césares biografiados en las Vitae Caesarum de Suetonio se enriquecían con efigies de emperadores, privados, hombres de letras y sabios griegos y romanos con el fin de decorar los espacios palaciales más nobles y reafirmar con ello el poder del coleccionista y de sus familiares, que a través de estas imágenes del pasado manifestaban la continuidad histórica de su ascen- dencia, el valor de su estirpe y la legitimidad de los cargos que desempeñaban en su sociedad. En la actualidad, buena parte de estos retratos se conservan en los almacenes de los museos o se exhiben en sus salas, pero en muchos casos se desconoce su iden- tidad, a quién se quiso que figurasen, si son antiguos o modernos, si resultan de una remodelación o si sufrieron restauraciones a lo largo de su historia. Este libro ofrece una reflexión en entorno a estas esculturas de colección que representan a VIRI ANTIQVI, es una aproximación a estas obras desde un punto de vista multidisciplinar en la que conservadores y restauradores de museos, arqueólogos e historiadores del arte han puesto en común sus análisis para obtener una comprensión más completa del origen, la función y la historia de estos retratos masculinos de estilo clásico. En este volumen se atiende al gusto de renombrados coleccionistas como Nicolàs de Azara, Miquel May, Giovanni Grimani o Ippolito II d'Este. Se analiza la reparación de estas esculturas a lo largo de la historia mediante el estudio de casos de la Gliptoteca de Múnich, de los Preussische Schlösser und Garten de Berlín y Brandemburgo, de la Casa ducal de Medinaceli en Sevilla y del Museu d’Arqueologia de Catalunya y se reflexiona sobre las metodologías de conservación y restauración de más actualidad. Se profundiza en aspectos iconográficos de personajes muy valorados en estas colecciones modernas como Pseudo Vitelio, Julio César, Cicerón, Antonino Pío o Caracalla y se consideran dos tipos de producciones que habitualmente completaron estas series de viri ilustres y que a pesar de ello no se han tratado en profundidad. Uno de ellos lo constituyen los bustos sobre los que se colocaron estos retratos y el segundo los medallones marmóreos con efigies imperiales o viri cultos.
Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica 25/2 (December 2019)
Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica, 2020
Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica 25/1 (August 2019) http://saa.uaic.ro/issues/xxv-1/ CUPRINS – CONTENTS – SOMMAIRE PAPERS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Genealogies in the Ancient World Tartu (Estonia) 2016 —Sebastian FINK & Vladimir SAZONOV ——Introduction —Sebastian FINK & Vladimir SAZONOV ——Complex Genealogies in Mesopotamia: From Mesilim to Tukultī-Ninurta I —Siim MÕTTUS ——On the Lineage of King Telepinu —Mait KÕIV ——Manipulating Genealogies: Pheidon of Argos and the Stemmas of the Argive, Macedonian, Spartan and Median Kings —Jakub KUCIAK ——Der Mythos im Dienst der Politik: das Beispiel der euripideischen Tragödie Ion —Stephan SCHARINGER ——A Genealogy of Pythagoras —Tarmo KULMAR ——The Origin Myths as a Possible Basis for Genealogy of the Inca Imperial Dynasty in Ancient Peru ARTICLES —Radu-Ștefan BALAUR ——Community Structure, Economy and Sharing Strategies in the Chalcolithic Settlement of Hăbășești, Romania —Casandra BRAȘOVEANU ——Settlement Spatial Distribution from Late Chalcolithic to Early Hallstatt. Case Study: Cracău-Bistrița Depression —Anna LAZAROU ——Prehistoric Gorgoneia: a Critical Reassessment —Alexandr LOGINOV & Vladimir SHELESTIN ——La perception du sceptre en Grèce de l’époque d’Homère et de Mycènes à la lumière des parallèles de l’Orient Antique —Larisa PECHATNOVA ——Die Hypomeiones in Sparta —Elena NIKITYUK ——Kalokagathia: to a Question on Formation of an Image of the Ideal Person in Antiquity and During Modern Time —Maxim M. KHOLOD ——On the Representation and Self-representation of the Argead Rulers (before Alexander the Great): the Title Basileus —Dragana NIKOLIĆ ——Stoneworkers’ Hercules. A Comment on an Upper Moesian Inscription —José María ZAMORA CALVO ——Remarks on the so-called Plotinus’ Sarcophagus (‘Vatican Museums’, inv. 9504) —Cornel BALLA ——Some Considerations on the Praefectus ripae legionis primae Ioviae cohortis et secundae Herculiae musculorum Scythicorum et classis in plateypegiis —Felix-Adrian TENCARIU & Andrei ASĂNDULESEI ——‘Rock Salt Around the Clock’. Ethnoarchaeological Research Concerning Traditional Extraction of Salt for Animal Consumption
2017
During the first millennium BCE, the Neo-Assyrian Empire imposed a wide hegemony over the Near East. The ways it used to build such rule over vast and diverse territories were not only political, military, diplomatic and administrative. Communication and propaganda were also fundamental to spread the reputation of the Assyrian military might and to proclaim a divine legitimacy to unleash it, according to values of an ancient political culture in Mesopotamia. Since the royal institution was the higher instance of authority on earth, and the king its visible face and personification, the sovereign’s images were the main element of a more general political discourse that unfolded into iconography, texts and ceremonies on which the ruler was due to participate. This work intends to investigate yet another facet of representations such as these: the materialization of the image of the king as symbolic instrument for the appropriation and organization of the imperial space, either in its centers or in peripheral areas. It intends to demonstrate that, in many ways, this symbolic dimension of kingship was supplementary to the effective conquest and administration of territories, and to the more concrete and mundane management of politics and diplomacy. It was through the performative capacity of rituals that used images, pictures and other signs considered to represent and substitute the king that the presence of the ruler – and of power itself – came to be understood as real and concrete. Therefore, this dissertation will deal with relevant aspects of Assyrian royal ideology resorting, on the one hand, to structural features of Mesopotamian culture transmitted by mythological, literary and celebrative texts; on the other, to monuments such as statues on the round, stelae and rock reliefs bearing the picture of the king. The iconography, the contexts and potential audiences of artifacts such as these were only some of the most explicit aspects of the materialization of the king’s presence, ergo, of Assyrian dominance, in diversified spaces and places.
2008
This article deals with several claims recently made by Levy et al. 1 regarding pottery from Edom and sites in the Negev. Building their argument on two assumptions-that Khirbet en-Nahas constitutes part of Edom and that the fortress there dates to the 10 th century BCE-they maintain that sites on the Edomite plateau had been dated to the late 7 th-6 th centuries BCE based on a single find-the seal impression carrying the inscription "Qos Gabr king of Edom"-and hint that this pottery should in fact be dated earlier. And based on the architectural similarity between the fortress at Khirbet en-Nahas and the fortresses of Tell el-Kheleifeh at the head of the Gulf of Aqaba and of En HaÐeva in the western Arabah south of the Dead Sea, they date the latter two to the 10 th century BCE, several centuries earlier than the broadly-accepted date in the Iron IIB/C. In this article we take issue with these claims. We show that dating the sites on the Edomite plateau to the late 8 th-to-early 6 th centuries BCE is backed by meticulous comparison to well-stratified and dated sites in southern Judah. We also show that the fortresses of Tell el-Kheleifeh and En HaÐeva cannot be dated earlier than the late 8 th century. We then deal with the reasons for Levy et al.'s errors.
Le Mort dans la Ville. Deuxièmes Rencontres d'Archéologie de l'IFEA, Istanbul 8-9 Novembre 2012
Le développement de rites mortuaires complexes dans l’histoire de l’Homme a résulté dans un rôle croissant joué par les pratiques funéraires utilisées comme moyen de resserrer les liens à l’intérieur d’une même communauté. À cet égard, le singulier usage d'inhumer un individu au coeur de la communauté révèle avec acuité la force de cette relation que pouvaient entretenir les vivants et les morts. Les découvertes archéologiques récentes ont souligné l’importance de telles pratiques liées aux inhumations intra-muros en Anatolie. Bien qu’il semble possible de tisser un lien continu entre ces coutumes, les contextes dans lesquels s’inscrivent la pratique d’inhumer une personne au coeur même de la communauté, depuis l’enfant du Néolithique à Çatalhöyük à la libraire de Celsius à Ephèse, en passant par le Mausolée d'Halicarnasse, ont néanmoins radicalement changés en fonction des époques et des lieux. L’objectif de ce volume, en rassemblant des spécialistes de périodes et d’horizons différents, est d’offrir non seulement un point général de nos connaissances sur ces questions, mais aussi un éclairage concernant le mécanisme de ces pratiques, leur contexte et leur impact en Anatolie, du début de l’Âge du Bronze à l’époque romaine.