Organising an Empire: The Assyrian Way (original) (raw)
Related papers
The history of the Middle-Assyrian Empire
This article aims to re-evaluate the history of the Middle Assyrian Empire by looking at new archaeological data and by critically re-examining the textual evidence. Special attention will be given to concepts like ‘Empire’, the ‘rise’ and ‘fall’, and related models of social organisation. It argues that while the territory controlled by the Assyrian kings remained more constant than normally argued, its internal organisation was more flexible.
The Assyrian Empire abd Cyprus .pdf
The book deals with the interaction between the Neo-Assyrian Empire and the Cypriot kingdoms in the 8th and 7th centuries B.C. It examines the Assyrian policies and how they were applied in the South Mediterranean coast as well as their first state controlled world economy. It looks into the possibility whether the Assyrians established a nascent navy in the Mediterranean during the late Neo-Assyrian period.It compares how the Assyrians behaved in Dilmun the other extreme border outpost of the Neo-Assyrian Empire. Finally the book examines in detail how Cyprus prospered and survived in the shadow of the Assyrian empire.
(2016) Cultivating Subjects in the Neo-Assyrian Empire
Journal of Social Archaeology 16(3): 307-334, 2016
This article, which centers upon the Neo-Assyrian empire of the early first millennium BCE, presents agriculture as a field of political intervention and transformation in the creation of imperial subjectivities. As part of the expansion process into territories of Upper Mesopotamia, Neo-Assyrian rulers (ca. 900–600 BCE) relied on settled agriculture to produce and promote imperial subjects bound to the authorities for whom they tilled and toiled. However, archaeobotanical data from Tušhan, a provincial capital of the empire, reveals that people under Neo-Assyria's control did not fully conform to the idealized agrarian lifeways construed by officials to uphold Assyrian power and dictate subject conduct. Evidence for semi-nomadic pastoralism at Tušhan exposes the slippage between ideal agrarian subject and actual agrarian practice in the Neo-Assyrian empire, wherein lies the contestation over politically oriented subjectivities and their instantiation through land-use.