Negotiating tensions around new forms of academic writing (original) (raw)
Related papers
The value of academics’ research-related online writing
Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies
Research productivity indicators tend to ignore online and social media writing of academics, nevertheless, many academics for instance tweet and blog. It thus seems that there is additional value for writing in these genres. This study sets out to explore what roles writing in these hybrid online genres plays in relation to academics’ research activities. Drawing on in-depth research interviews with 29 academics with various L1s from three different disciplines, the study focuses on the participants’ perceptions of tweeting and blogging, and how they value writing in these genres in relation to core research-writing genres in their fields. Besides some differences in the evaluations between the disciplines, in general the academics expressed a strong orientation towards evaluative regimes related to writing in their core genres, particularly institutional merit systems and peer review systems. At the same time, the hybrid genres seemed to gain value beyond these systems in providin...
Article title: The Role of Networked Learning in Academics' Writing Practices
Research in Learning Technology, 2017
This paper explores academics' writing practices, focusing on the ways in which they use digital platforms in their processes of collaborative learning. It draws on interview data from a research project that has involved working closely with academics across different disciplines and institutions to explore their writing practices, understanding academic literacies as situated social practices. The paper outlines the characteristics of academics' ongoing professional learning, demonstrating the importance of collaborations on specific projects in generating learning in relation to using digital platforms and for sharing and collaborating on scholarly writing. A very wide range of digital platforms have been identified by these academics, enabling new kinds of collaboration across time and space on writing and research; but challenges around online learning are also identified, particularly the dangers of engaging in learning in public, the pressures of 'always-on'-ness, and the different values systems around publishing in different forums.
The role of networked learning in academics’ writing
Research in Learning Technology
This paper explores academics' writing practices, focusing on the ways in which they use digital platforms in their processes of collaborative learning. It draws on interview data from a research project that has involved working closely with academics across different disciplines and institutions to explore their writing practices, understanding academic literacies as situated social practices. The paper outlines the characteristics of academics' ongoing professional learning, demonstrating the importance of collaborations on specific projects in generating learning in relation to using digital platforms and for sharing and collaborating on scholarly writing. A very wide range of digital platforms have been identified by these academics, enabling new kinds of collaboration across time and space on writing and research; but challenges around online learning are also identified, particularly the dangers of engaging in learning in public, the pressures of 'always-on'ness, and the different values systems around publishing in different forums.
The Role of Networked Learning in Academics' Writing Practices
2017
This paper explores academics' writing practices, focusing on the ways in which they use digital platforms in their processes of collaborative learning. It draws on interview data from a research project that has involved working closely with academics across different disciplines and institutions to explore their writing practices, understanding academic literacies as situated social practices. The paper outlines the characteristics of academics' ongoing professional learning, demonstrating the importance of collaborations on specific projects in generating learning in relation to using digital platforms and for sharing and collaborating on scholarly writing. A very wide range of digital platforms have been identified by these academics, enabling new kinds of collaboration across time and space on writing and research; but challenges around online learning are also identified, particularly the dangers of engaging in learning in public, the pressures of 'always-on'ness, and the different values systems around publishing in different forums.
CECI conference, 2014
The diffusion and adoption of ICTs and the wide success of social networks of all kinds represent a challenge and an opportunity for researchers in social sciences and humanities (i.e. Thelwall and Kousha 2013; Veletsianos 2011; Kirkup, 2010). The global nature of the scientific enterprise makes increasingly tough competition not only in publishing but also in obtaining grants and funding. Researchers can (and are encouraged to) use digital media to promote and communicate their work, to build interpersonal and professional networks, to raise funds, to find job opportunities and to share content and receive feedbacks. In order to increase their visibility and to generate new weak ties (Granovetter, 1983), they develop new strategies for migrating their academic identity (Henkel, 2000) online. Which are the professional behaviours that researchers in social sciences and humanities exhibit through their digital profiles? Which tools and strategies do they adopt? Which kind of contents do they diffuse on their homepages? This paper is meant to provide an answer to these questions by investigating the features and strategies of online communication in the particular context of academia. Through empirical analysis, we aim to understand how researchers use the Web and social platforms such as Facebook and Twitter as well as professional social networks such as Academia and LinkedIn to promote their research and their personal and professional image. We will pay special attention to the process of building their online identities and social relationships throughout one or more platforms (Casilli, 2010 ; Cardon, 2008).
Use of blogs, Twitter and Facebook by PhD Students for Scholarly Communication: A UK study
2012
This study explores scholarly use of social media by PhD researchers through mix-methods of qualitative interviews, participant observation and content analysis of a case study #phdchat. We found that blogs, Twitter and Facebook are among the most popular social media tools being used by researchers. They can be used by PhD students and early career researchers to benefit their scholarly communication practice, promote their professional profiles, disseminate their work to a wider audience quickly, and gain feedbacks and support from peers across the globe. There are also difficulties and potential problems such as the lack of standards and incentives, the risks of idea being pinched and plagiarism, lack of knowledge of how to start and maintain using social media tool and the potential huge amount of time and effort needed to invest. We found that respondents link different social media tools together to maximise the impact of the content disseminated, as well as to create a person...
SOTL in the South, 2021
Academic publishing plays a visible role in the lives of academics in the contemporary university. This paper, located in the academic literacies field of critical enquiry, illustrates the complex ways in which two South African academics understood and discursively constructed their identities through their writing for a recently published book exploring lecturers’ teaching and learning contexts and practices. The autoethnographic sensitivity of the research enabled the elicitation of critical self-reflective accounts, presented through detailed individual reflective sketches. The analysis uses the concepts of autobiographical self, discoursal self and affiliation (Ivanič, 1998; 2005) to show how these writers were able to discursively represent themselves in the book. It further highlights how continued disparities and inequities that characterise academic publication are experienced by the writers. The findings demonstrate the value of the social practice view of writing and its capacity to make visible how writers enact various linguistic, rhetorical and stylistic resources as they discursively construct their alignment to their scholarship community. In particular, it illuminates generative spaces where academic development practitioners can lead dialogues to re-examine current publication practices, their consequential nature for writers and explore possibilities to support emergent SOTL authors.
Digital academic discourse: Texts and contexts Introduction
This Special Issue focuses on how digital media -blogs, tweets, and other digital platforms -are used by researchers, and how these new modes of academic communication have impacted writing practices and language uses in the academy. It brings together research in two related areas of scholarship: academic discourse analysis and literacies research. In this introductory article, we first outline the concept of digital academic discourse as we perceive it in the context of our Special Issue and show how it is related to, and at the same time different from, its "analogue" predecessor. We then continue to discuss the practices surrounding the production of academic texts with the support of digital media, followed by an outline of how both digital academic discourse and related writing practices are tied to the networks, communities and spaces in which they take place. Next, methodological issues in the study of digital academic discourse are considered, and the articles in this special issue are presented in connection to the themes outlined above. We conclude by contextualising the studies reported here within current trends in discourse analytical and sociolinguistic research and identify venues for future studies.
2013
Scholarship in transition: mapping the changing ecology The entire scholarship ecology has been changing shape as scholarly practices become digitally-mediated as a norm, and as openness in the higher education terrain becomes more mainstream. Every dimension of traditional scholarly cycles are affected: the conceptualisation of research, data collection and data analysis, the publishing and sharing of findings, as well as the translation of findings through teaching and engaged scholarship. In a context where communication is visible, content now intrinsically includes communication; expectations are for two-way interaction, new relationships are formed and old ones change shape with emergent roles and activities which previously did not exist. Understandings of impact and value are under scrutiny with the rise of non – traditional outputs and the development of alternative metrics of impact. This presentation will map these changes, provide examples of new tools and trends, and consider the power plays, threats and opportunities for the role players involved.
A New Materialist take on the possibilities and impossibilities of becoming a scholarly blogger
International Journal for Academic Development, 2020
As social media platforms become increasingly entangled in how academia gets performed, there is growing pressure on individuals to cultivate a digital presence or risk becoming invisible. While some adopt new and emerging online communicative tools with gusto and élan, there are others who resent and resist their creeping territorialisation of workspaces. This paper uses a feminist New Materialist onto-epistemology to offer an alternative understanding of the material, discursive, and affective forces that enfold to nurture and/or neuter the uptake of scholarly blogging practices in academia. Unlike conventional humanist ontologies, a New Materialist approach views agency as distributed across all matternot just the human form. This approach allows for the social, historical, affective, technological, and spatial forces, fluxes, and flows shaping and reshaping diverging scholarly blogging practices and performances to be plumbed. The insights generated have implications for how academic developers might encourage the uptake of scholarly blogging within and across their institutions.