Multiculturalism and "Baku Process" (original) (raw)
Related papers
“Metafizika” Journal (pISSN 2616-6879; eISSN 2617-751X), Serial. № 26, 2024
The article entitled "Multiculturalism is the main philosophical concept of social and political development in modern society" is devoted to the analysis of cultural and political problems occurring in modern societies in the context of globalization from a socio-philosophical aspect. The necessity of approaching the issue from the point of view of the current needs of the time and era, respect for other cultural identities, non-actualization of acts of radicalism, terrorism, extremism, religious fundamentalism, and racism, which may cause imbalance in the system of ethnic-political relations of polyethnic societies in the era of globalization, and taking complex measures calculated for a safe future in relation to ethnic-political subjects is reflected in the article. In a philosophical sense, the term multiculturalism is a generalized expression of the cultures to which social subjects belong, having a broad meaning and incorporating different values.. It is known that culture and spirituality are historical philosophical systems, and depending on the rules of time and the form of the social structure at each stage of historical development, the culture and spirituality change and renew. Multiculturalism is a form of tolerance in which representatives of different national cultures coexist in conditions of equal rights and self-affirmation within a single country. The philosophical-theoretical basis of the multiculturalism paradigm is precisely the mutual understanding of parallel cultures in global society, joint activity, and even their equal dialogue. The article analyzes the concept of multiculturalism from a philosophical perspective and primarily explains it as a synthesis of communitarianism and liberalism. It was especially noted that multiculturalism, as a humanist ideology, reflects the equality promoted by communitarianism and respect for individuality and other cultures and religions, as liberals say. The article draws attention to the transformation of the multiculturalism paradigm into the main philosophical and political concept of modern societies against the background of globalization and the formation of the political doctrine of many developed countries, including the Republic of Azerbaijan, in the context of state policy.
Bridging cultures: Multiculturalism and its implication in Azerbaijan
Multiculturalism defines a society that is predominantly composed of groups with different ethnic, geographic, religious and cultural roots which strive for equal positions on the markets of labor, goods and capital. The main objective of this paper is imparting adequate knowledge about the identification of multiculturalism and its utilization in Azerbaijan.
Azerbaijan's Multicultural Model: An Exemplar for Conflict Resolution and Global Harmony
Azerbaijan’s Multicultural Model: An Exemplar for Conflict Resolution and Global Harmony, 2024
Introduction-In a world where ethnic and religious discrimination has become commonplace, Azerbaijan stands as a model of intercultural and religious tolerance. Multiculturalism in Azerbaijan is not just a policy; it is a lifestyle ingrained in its history and culture. This ethos, preserved throughout centuries, forms the foundation of Azerbaijan's state policy and social fabric, making it an exemplary model of peaceful coexistence.
A FUNDAMENTAL STUDY OF MULTICULTURALISM AND MULTI-ETHNIC SOCIETIES
2021
The paper presents a fair perspective on most the feelings encompassing multiculturalism. Multiculturalism requires correspondence and its central importance is to incorporate others. Its point is the nonattendance of inclination and looking for just equivalent status among racial and ethnic gatherings. All the more halfway, my motivation of this article is to dissect the hypothesis of multiculturalism and to put the best meaning of it other than alluding to the difficulties face multicultural society. In multicultural society individuals appreciate equivalent regard, nobility, and personality because of the equivalent social arrangement of their general public. I'm insinuating the possibility of equity and having a place. Since in any coordinated society, having a place helps individuals of various ethnic foundation to be treated as regarded, dependable, and to be shielded from rejection. In the light of these contemplations, multiculturalism implies the incorporation of social minorities into the host social orders. Multiculturalism implies shared estimations of the general public all in all and enthusiasm for its variety including strict social, and way of life foundation. It alludes to rise to a promising circumstance and antiracist society. Multiculturalism turns into a significant develop for the 21th century. It permits social orders and people groups to be brought together through an enthusiasm for their social contrasts and semantic foundation. The primary benefits of the multicultural society are value, social equity and opportunity. All the people groups everywhere on the world try to accomplish these benefits inside their social orders.
15 Multiculturalism: Symptom, Cause or Solution?
Challenging Multiculturalism, 2012
The conceptual paradox 'Multiculturalism' is a paradoxical notion, while 'multicultural' is not. The-ism part of the concept may connote ideology, policy or discourse, but in all cases it stands for an approach to a culturally diverse social reality informed by a normative objective to frame, control and steer developments in a particular direction. While 'multicultural' simply describes a state of affairs-a society composed of people representing different cultural and ethnic backgrounds and attachments-'multiculturalism' more often than not is prescriptive or, when used by analysts, is meant to designate either a state committed to a social model viewing multiculturalism as in some way desirable or, more negatively, a state following worthwhile if objectionable motives. This notion of multiculturalism is paradoxical (and hence diffi cult to handle in real terms), because it runs counter to the generic model and intellectual template on which nationalism is grounded. Empires are based on ideas and practices of diversity regimes and political models for managing geographically expansive units. Even post-imperial states in early-European modernity (following the Peace of Westphalia in 1648) were routinely 'multicultural', 'composite' or 'heterogeneous' in one way or another; examples include Denmark, Italy, Germany, France and Britain. But the nation state was from its inception, as notably Ernest Gellner (1983) has memorably described it, based on the (political) ideal of congruity between culture, territory, ethnicity and politics, between state and nation, and between citizenship, identity, language and belonging. In other words, the nation state from earliest times rested on cultural homogeneity-monoculturalism-in spite of the indisputable fact that reality, then as well as now, is frequently typifi ed by cultural diversity, majority-minority tensions, linguistic hierarchies, regional disparities and religious confl ict.
Title of Paper Multiculturalism...
This paper strives to discuss multiculturalism which often resulted from the concentration of people of different cultures initiated by geo-political actions of the people or colonialism and it is common in nations and continents. The paper stressed the process through which multiculturalism enriches cultural enterprises for national development as well as took a swirl on each constituent of culture and its economic embodiment that swells national development. It x-rayed the collective strength of multiculturalism and the bountiful enterprises bequeathed on the people of any nation that is multiculturalised. It further substantiated the need for nations to take advantage of enterprise potentials of multiculturalism for national development. It posit that, rather than mirror multiculturalism as differences and allow it inform negative political views, its enterprise advantages should be exploited. This is because it is capable of creating employment as well as enhances choices of cultural products and services. It further held that multiculturally influenced enterprises culminate into multi-economic values for a nation. Therefore, it suggested the exploitation of multicultural enterprises benefits which enriches national development. The paper concluded that the benefits of multiculturalism should be of utmost consideration rather than the differences within the component cultures. It however, insisted on the political management of multiculturalism through a cultural policy mechanism that provides for equality to avoid violence which often stems from violation of cultural rights. It added that multiculturalism goes with multicultural alternatives in resolving cultural conflicts in the event of mutual coexistence.
The essence and specificity of the state multiculturalism policy
Przegląd Europejski, 2022
The main aim of this article is to examine multiculturalism as a specific policy of multi-ethnic states, and its essence and specificity. Multiculturalism can be considered as a policy aimed at preserving and developing cultural diversity in a particular state, as well as a theory or ideology justifying such policy. In the essence of multiculturalism lies the idea of the peaceful coexistence of different groups-ethnic, racial, religious, cultural, and other-within one state. The present study addresses the following research question: how multiculturalism obligations have been considered by state policy? In the course of the research, the answer to this question was achieved by analysing what multiculturalism is, and then-examining several theoretical approaches to this policy. As a result, the author concluded that multiculturalism can be a component of state policy only in states where the government actively promotes and protects the rights and interests of various cultural groups.
Multiculturalism as a Defensible Ideal
Multiculturalism has been a controversial issue for years. Numerous scholars have discussed on it, examined societies with different cultural communities, and come up with two main different arguments. One of such arguments alleges that the idea of multiculturalism is a threat for countries, especially the countries that follow liberal aspect, thus it is not desirable. The other argument alleges that multicultural accommodation has merits to establish harmony especially for countries with different communities, separated cultures so on. In this paper, we aim to discuss briefly the idea of multiculturalism. After clarifying what multicultural accommodation is, we invoke Kymlicka's, one of the dominant multiculturalism theorists and advocates, thoughts, and then we appeal the arguments against them. While doing this, Brian Barry's, a political philosopher who was one of the solid opponents of multiculturalism, is our main objector. We focus mainly on the egalitarian critics of multiculturalism on the one hand; and try to reveal some problems for cultural rights on the other. The cases, also the problems, in the paper is taken from western countries but they all have merit to understand all multicultural conflicts and their remedies. Therefore, what we hope is to give possible perspectives for Turkey that has begun to face the difficulties of multiculturalism because of millions of refuges.