Constructing learning spaces: What we can learn from studies of informal learning online (original) (raw)
Related papers
See you after school?" How informal virtual learning environments are influencing formal education
2008
There are two forms of e-learning environments: formal and informal. E-learning that provides formal education is led by a trained academic, teacher or instructor, meets certain pre-established standards, and is designed to lead towards the attainment of a conferred award. Informal e-learning can be considered as learning environments which are exploratory and self-directed. Popular virtual gaming environments, for example, are visually rich, player-centred environments. These are now shaping the way in which neomillennials wish to engage in formal education, blurring the distinction between formal and informal learning. Doctoral research examined learning style preferences in visual and verbal modes of communication. The results of the research support the argument for the inclusion of visual communication in formal e-learning environments. This is achieved by maintaining a balanced approach in learning design by not foregrounding one communicational mode (verbal) over another (vis...
Where are the Students? Social and Learning Practices in Digital Settings
2020
The aim of the study is to understand the role of social presence in digitally mediated learning processes and, consequently, to improve the design of the courses we teach at UNED. The spaces of greatest interaction between students are social networks and mobile instant messaging services, not only for social purposes but also for learning. That is why we are researching about students’ practices in those spaces while they are studying. In this paper, we present preliminary findings identifying if those social interactions happen within the online courses or in other digital spaces.
Disorienting spaces: Engaging the multiple “student” in online learning
Effective student engagement in learning is not a simple transposition of practices from the traditional classroom to the online environment, and strategies for engaging students may work less well in the unbounded spaces of interaction of the Internet where assumed understandings of teaching and learning have less hold. Even experienced practitioners encounter unexpected outcomes when designing pedagogies to engage students online, and in a range of studies students have been found to show great variation in how they engage in online learning. This study explores the complexities of shifting teaching practices to online spaces and the effects on the interactions of participants. One of these effects is the disorientation reported by practitioners in their attempts to apply strategies to engage students online. This paper investigates the mismatch between expectations of teaching academics and students by focussing on what the “student” is online. I use two analytical moves: a discourse analysis of practitioners interviews to identify “ways of talking” about students, and Annemarie Mol’s (2002; 1999) concept of enactment to understand student activity and identity in the interactive spaces of online learning. My argument is that understanding the category of “student” as enacted in multiple versions offers a way to approach the “potentially disorienting spaces” (Bayne and Ross, 2007) of teaching practices in online spaces. Keywords: discourse analysis, online learning, enactment, student engagement
Creating Social Spaces to Facilitate Reflective Learning On-Line
When this paper was first conceived last Spring, my colleague Rob Kling and I intended to discuss some of the socio-technical challenges we faced as educators to create the social spaces that ensured reflective learning at the graduate level in a web-based environment. Our own experiences reinforced the conclusion that effective learning experiences were dependent on a large array of factors related to higher education institutions [1]. This past summer, however, I moved from Florida State University School of Information Studies to Indiana University School of Library and Information Science (SLIS). That move interrupted my analysis of two years worth of data on student learning in a web-based, graduate level introductory research methods course that I had taught at Florida State and had intended to present at this conference. During this transition I radically revised my fall semester's course in information policy whose syllabus and resources were to be available at SLIS's web site. This process had the serendipitous effect of forcing me to rethink the paper.
Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning
It is argued that social media has the potential to bridge formal and informal learning through participatory digital cultures. Exemplars of sophisticated use by young people support this claim, although the majority of young people adopt the role of consumers rather than full participants. Scholars have suggested the potential of social media for integrating formal and informal learning, yet this work is commonly under-theorised. We propose a model theorising social media as a space for learning with varying attributes of formality and informality. Through two contrasting case studies we apply our model together with social constructivism and connectivism as theoretical lenses through which to tease out the complexities of learning in various settings. We conclude that our model could reveal new understandings of social media in education, and outline future research directions.
2019
Traditional learning environments are often constrained by time and place. Many researchers have suggested that social networking tools are one way to support a more participatory and interactive experience for students in the higher education classroom and encourage learning connections across time and place. While social networking tools, such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube are commonly used and studied in higher education, the use of Google+ Communities is still in its infancy. (Note: Google announced in October 2018 that they would be shutting down Google + in 2019; however, the results of this study can be extended to other social media platforms.) The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore how the utilization of an online informal learning environment (Google + Communities) influenced the success of preservice teachers in a children’s literature course. While the results indicated that the Google + Community did not have a statistically significant effect on p...
Developing third places to foster sense of community in online instruction
British Journal of Educational Technology, 2015
Using principles of Oldenburg's concept of third place to characterize sense of community, this paper establishes a framework for the creation of sustainable, informal learning communities that promote dialogue and interpersonal relationships. This paper discusses Oldenburg's theory of third place, presents a framework to implement online third place communities in educational settings, and offers examples, recommendations and implications for future research. This paper provides a framework for third place development in online learning environments. We propose that virtual third places can meet all criteria established by Oldenburg. The development of virtual third places only occurs over time and violations of third place characteristics are part of the development process. However, these violations should be eliminated over time through continuous evaluation, modification, and implementation of the space, users, activities and organizational needs, goals and resources. Succeeding in an online learning environment is dependent upon a number of factors. Building a community of learners with strong social relationships is critical among these factors (Junk, Deringer & Junk, 2011; Palloff & Pratt, 2007). Sense of community is a feeling of mutual trust, connection and similarity with others that develops over time (Conrad, 2005; Rovai, 2001). Community is a psychological condition of feeling close to groups of individuals who share membership, influence, common needs and emotional connection (McMillan & Chavis, 1986; Perrucci, Coscarelli, Balboni, & Cacciamani, 2012). The nature of online learning brings together individuals with opportunities to connect and share in a defined environment. Rovai (2001, p 2) found that community formation in online learning environments simulates "the comforts of home, providing a safe climate, an atmosphere of trust and respect, an invitation for intellectual exchange, and a gathering place for like-minded individuals." He also identified several characteristics of classroom community: Classroom community is strong when learners (a) feel connected to each other and to the instructor, (b) manifest the immediate communication behaviors that reduce social and psychological distance between people, (c) share common interests and values, (d) trust and help each other, (e) actively engage in two-way communications, and (f) pursue common learning objectives (p 322). When these characteristics are not present, issues may arise. Lacking a sense of community can create a social gap between learners and between learners and their instructor (