Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein and Academic Talmud Study (original) (raw)
Related papers
Forms of Rabbinic Literature and Thought: An Introduction - By Alexander Samely
Reviews in Religion & Theology, 2008
ISBN 0-232-52676-1), 246 pp., pb £12.95 James Alison, a British Roman Catholic priest and theologian, is known primarily for two preoccupations. First, he appropriates theologically the insights of René Girard on violence and mimetic rivalry, making them available to a broader, nonspecialist audience. Second, he is gay and has worked for full inclusion of gays and lesbians in Catholicism, a move which has been rather costly for him, relegating him to 'the long-term unemployed' as he puts it (p. 13). He returns to these two concerns in this, his most recent work.
Winged Words: Benjamin, Rosenzweig, and the Life of Quotation
2023
This is the first book to explore the role of quotation in modern Jewish thought. Weaving back and forth from Walter Benjamin to Franz Rosenzweig, the book searches for the recovery of concealed and lost meaning in the community of letters, sacred scripture, the collecting of books, storytelling, and the life of liturgy. It also explores how the legacy of Goethe can be used to develop new strata of religious and Jewish thought. We learn how quotation is the binding tissue that links language and thought, modernity and tradition, religion and secularism as a way of being in the world.
Among the most precious of my lingering memories of our academic symposium of November 1992 was a chance encounter quite unrelated to the formal series of scholarly pre sentations. It was at the end of the first day of dazzling lectures that opened the conference. We had gathered for dinner in the College dining room, and I accompanied Geoffrey Hartmann, our keynote speaker, through the food line to a table where three or four rabbis were already seated. The rabbis had been engrossed in a heated and seemingly contentious discussion over the results of our first lectures, including the eloquent but recondite reflections of the literary critic of Ya le. Before Hartmann had lifted his fork to his mouth, one young rabbi startled him with the following remark: "W hy in Heaven's name do I need your literary analysis to make sense of the Torah? It is enough for me to read the parshat ha-shavuah each week unencumbered by your sophisticated academic tools of reading a text." Hartmann was to find little opportunity to enjoy his food. He was confronted by a challenge rarely offered by his highly sophisticated students in English and comparative literature in his classroom in New Haven, or by the countless scholars around the world familiar with his essays on literary criticism. Unlike his students, who take for granted the intrinsic value of his literary perspicacity, Hartmann had stepped into another environment-another planet, so to speak-where the utility of his academic skills as a literary scholar was called into ques tion and where he would have to justify himself and his profes sion before a young man unimpressed by the scholar's stellar accomplishments and unmoved by his genuinely authentic con cerns to examine the Jewish tradition through the sensitive eyes of a trained reader of literary texts. The ensuing conversation between Hartmann and his defiant critic proved to be less than conclusive in the quiet moments
For a noble and sentimental literature: N. Steinhardt and the essay as a form of freedom
Swedish journal of Romanian studies, 2024
N. Steinhardt, the author of Jurnalul fericirii [The Diary of Happiness], was not only an exquisite intellectual colporteur, but also an erudite essayist of astonishing spontaneity, who gave his intellectual discourse a remarkable cultural breadth, which places him in the same spiritual family as Alexandru Odobescu, Paul Zarifopol, Mihail Ralea, Alexandru Paleologu or Andrei Pleșu. In spite of the diversity of the themes addressed, the essays of the later monk of Rohia preserve a basic unity, revealed in a coherent modus cogitandi and a defensive ethos, intended to protect individual freedom through recourse to modesty and to what Paleologu called common sense as paradox. Reading Steinhardt's essays is also a powerful antidote to laziness of thought, offering the reader the chance to escape from the narrow horizon of commonplaces. Leaving aside the prison memorial and the texts on religious subjects, which are permeated by the same essayistic vein, we highlighted the fact that Steinhardt understood literary criticism as an ingenious creative activity, polemically anti-positivist, susceptible to new and surprising cultural analogies, incessantly pleading for the rehabilitation of subjectivity, emotion and feeling as essential factors in the process of knowledge, from the perspective of a fundamental humanism drawing from Montaigne's tradition.