What is Art? - A research on the concept and perception of Art in the 21st Century (original) (raw)
Related papers
What Is Art? From the Perspective of an Art Creator
Roczniki Kulturoznawcze
The presented statement is part of the volume it covers a variety of responses from people who interact with art in different ways. The aim is to suggest to the participant of the contemporary world a new, personal perspective to rethink what is this area of our world that we label with art; thoughts with and without theoretical suggestions - reflections by the creators and reflections by the audience, teaching humility and uniqueness, perhaps - forming a fresh perspective on art.
The cultural definition of art
Most modern definitions of art fail to successfully address the issue of the ever-changing nature of art, and rarely even attempt to provide an account which would be valid in more than just the modern Western context. This article develops a new theory which preserves the advantages of its predecessors, solves or avoids their problems, and has a scope wide enough to account for art of different times and cultures. An object is art in a given context, it is argued, iff some person(s) culturally competent in this context afforded it the status of a candidate for appreciation for reasons considered good in this context. This weakly institutional view is supplemented by auxiliary definitions explaining the notions of cultural contexts, competence and good reasons for affording the status. The relativisation to contexts brings increased explanatory power and scope, and the ability to account for the diversity of art.
Journal of Arts and Humanities, 2017
Art is a creative phenomenon which changes constantly, not just insofar as it is being created continually, but also in the very meaning of ‘art.’ Finding a suitable definition of art is no easy task and it has been the subject of much inquiry throughout artistic expression. This paper suggests a crucial distinction between ‘art forms’ and ‘forms of art’ is necessary in order to better understand art. The latter of these corresponds to that which we would typically call art such as painting, singing, etc. The former corresponds to the form out of which these take shape, movement, speech, etc. With this distinction set out, it becomes clearer that art and the aesthetic is rooted in the properties of the ‘thing’ such as the color, shape, and the texture, rather than the product of creation itself. Thus, the future of art will bring a new aesthetic in which these properties become recognized as art and as such there will be an aesthetic of everyday life.
Social Roots of Defining Art: Sample of Art Students
For sure, to carry out a debate on the whatness of art is an attempt that should be affirmed. However, to discuss the whatn ess of art just through the concepts may end up with the ignorance of the most important element for creation of art, human being an d its social and artistic position. For this reason, what should be done is to answer the whatness of art through analyzing the people in the field of art. As it is known, in modern differentiated societies, entrance to the field of art is usually performed th rough the processes of formal education. Therefore, the aim of this study is to discuss on the social resources of the dominant art definitions by focusing on those that appear most likely to have the possibilities of reproducing, transforming or refusing the existing approaches to art. To achieve this goal, semi-structured interviews were made with 20 first class students who have just started their education and 20 fourth class students who will graduate in 2011-2012 academic year from Dicle University, Department of Fine Arts Training. As a result of these interviews, it was established that the university students' relationship with the art is very limited before and during their university education, their knowledge is insufficient and in accordance with this, they seem to agree on a definition of art which enables them to enter the field of art.
The traditional conception of art is about sensual beauty and refined taste; modern art on the other hand has introduced an entirely unexpected dimension to the visual arts, namely that of 'revelatory narrative'. Classical art aspires to present works which can be appreciated as sensually beautiful; modern art, when it succeeds, presents us instead with the unsettling narrative. This radical difference in artistic purpose is something relatively new, and not yet fully appreciated or understood.
Art, Human Condition and Beyond …
Journal of the Institute of Engineering, 2019
Philosophers of different ages have made rigorous attempts to define art aiming to establish a set of characteristics applicable to all kinds of fine arts. However to point a definite meaning of art is elusive task. Similarly the question whether art can be didactic to provide knowledge, or insight is as old as philosophy itself. Art can be appreciated, enjoyed and loved for the powerful emotional values it reflects to the beholders. The production of art deals with creativity, imagination and innate ability of an artist. Art evolves from the culture that inspires artistic expression and art is born from the inner necessity of the artist. To determine the coherent ontological status of works of art has been a problematic issue despite the consistent philosophical practices. The metaphysical categorization of art as "the imaginary experience of the total activity" of the artist recreated by competent viewer is not all inclusive perception of art. The more liberal outlook of art as abstract cultural entities that are created at certain time through human activities seems convincing and relevant.