Car-Free Initiatives from Around the World: Concepts for moving to Future Sustainable Mobility (original) (raw)
Related papers
Sustainability, 2019
Worldwide, academics and practitioners are developing ‘planning-oriented’ approaches to reduce the negative impacts of car traffic for more sustainable urban and transport development. One such example is the design of car-reduced neighborhoods, although these are controversial issues in the hegemonic ‘system’ of automobility. Despite the reduction of emissions and frequent recognition as ‘best practice examples’, ‘planning-critical’ research questions the underlying objectives and narratives of such sustainable developments. Our study contributes to this research perspective by improving the understanding of narratives that emerge along with car-reduced housing developments. For this purpose, we analyze two car-reduced neighborhoods in the City of Darmstadt (Germany) by conducting interviews with different actors involved in the planning and implementation processes. Our investigation reveals that the development of car-reduced neighborhoods (i) is consciously embedded in the conte...
Sustainable urban mobility: One definition, different stakeholders’ opinions
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020
During recent decades, the debate on how to sustain urban mobility has accelerated. Transport decision-making has been more reflective of sustainability issues and quality of life in cities; this process has especially accelerated with the setting of modern urban mobility planning concepts, substantially focusing on transport demand regulation and management, and Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans taking over the role of cities' primary transport-related strategic documents. The approaches to sustainable mobility visioning and planning differ within cities, as do their key stakeholders' opinions. Our research aims to reveal the main shared viewpoints on the preferred paths towards sustainable urban mobility. We use the Q method, which is a statistical method to study subjectivity. It enables determination of characteristic shared viewpoints on a particular subject. A qualitative analysis assessing subjective opinions is combined with the quantitative approach of a factor analysis of statements ranked by respondents. The study was undertaken on 36 carefully selected stakeholders situated within the Czech Republic. Our results indicate that even stakeholders sharing the same definition of sustainable urban mobility may substantially differ in regard to their ideas on how to achieve it. Furthermore, we show that some of the attitudes expressed and measures appreciated by our respondents would not be recognised as sustainable by environmentalists. There is still a wide gap between sustainable mobility theory and its implementation in practice. All these findings represent barriers to sustainable mobility development in urban areas. Therefore, the paper also conveys relevant policy implications. 1. Introduction Transport greatly influences sustainability and quality of life in cities. Above all, urban areas are confronted with transport-related air pollution, noise, congestion, occupation of public space by traffic, and increased morbidity and mortality rates caused by traffic accidents and pollution (Bosetti et al., 2014; EC, 2011; EC, 2017; IEA, 2019). Furthermore, using fossil fuels in internal combustion engines extends the harmful effects of urban transport far beyond city limits by contributing to global climate change; emission levels are growing rapidly and have been projected to double globally by 2050 (IPCC, 2014). These negative transport effects impact unequally on society, and accidents and air pollution particularly burden the most disadvantaged groups (
Two ways defining sustainable mobility: Autolib' and Bemobility
Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2014
European cities have emerged as laboratories for ‘sustainable mobility'. In the last few years, they have supported numerous electric car projects which combine clean engine technologies with offers on public or shared mobility. This paper compares two ongoing public electric car services in Berlin (BeMobility) and Paris (Autolib’). We explain how both projects shape future visions of sustainable mobility and transform regional transport systems in specific ways through their performative impact as local transport policy tools. Focusing on the socio-economic and political processes through which both projects were conceived and put into practice, we explain their differences as they reflect participating actors' interests in a French versus German industrial and transport policy context after the economic crisis in 2008. We find that whereas BeMobility integrates electric cars as one element in Berlin's intermodal transport system, and thus is centred around ‘intermodality' as the central vision of sustainable transport, Autolib’ in Paris essentially reproduces the dominant mode of private passenger car transport through adding a shared electric car fleet.
International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 2014
Recent developments in urban mobility in many affluent countries suggest that private car use is declining and this trend is beginning to open up opportunities for municipal planners to consider a future of less extensive reliance on automobiles. This analysis examines current efforts by cities to expand opportunities for non-motorised transport and identifies heritage cities, modern green metropolises and eco-cities as three urban archetypes with instructive potential. We then highlight the experience of brief case studies corresponding respectively to these paradigmatic forms: the Old City of Jerusalem, Copenhagen and Masdar City. The investigation entails the formulation and application of 10 planning criteria to assess each exemplar city on the basis of both built and human dimensions. The scoring system aims to identify design policies that can be relevant as planners commence in coming to years to more actively reconfigure urban space to facilitate non-motorised modes of urban mobility.
2018
The rapid growth of world population along with the sprawl growth of towns and suburbanization, has affected the human life and its surrounding nature dramatically. The fact is this level of growth is not sustainable with the current patterns of development. Most cities all around the world are designed in a way that encourages car dependency which is harming the environment and human health. During the past decade, urban planners formulate new principles of land use development to preserve the environment and protect public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens. These concepts are characterized by some movements such as sustainable communities, new urbanism, green urbanism, and livable places, pedestrian and transit-oriented development, healthy communities, retrofitting suburbia, brownfield redevelopment, community revitalization, and smart growth. The goal of most these movements is to reduce the amount of reliance on motor vehicles to have a sustainable community. O...
IJSES, 2023
In 1987, the world commission on environment and development described sustainable development as the "assembly of the needs of the present without compromising the capacity of future generations to fulfill their very own desires." From the above definition, you can actually see that sustainable development demands a creative manner that replaces unsustainable practices with new ones. consequently, towns and towns need to purpose to steer the way towards sustainable city improvement, and decision-makers want to understand that sustainable cities need to be creative and aesthetic. The motive of this paper is to develop a conceptual ecology model of a sustainable future that comprises ideas, tips, and strategies (PGS) for cities and towns without personal cars. The paper concludes that sustainable site visitors and transportation development require an incentive method that replaces unsustainable practices with new sustainable practices
Success Measures for Transforming Into Car-Free Cities: Recommendations for Implementation
Humanizing Cities Through Car-Free City Development and Transformation, 2020
Private cars contribute heavily to air pollution and significantly lower air quality in cities. The number of deaths because of pollution and car accidents is increasing on a global level; therefore, achieving sustainable mobility in urban areas is essential. Hence, the transformation into a car-free model is not a marginal issue but rather a crucial need that should be a global trend. The biggest challenge in this transforming process is to minimize the dependency on private cars. This chapter reviews thoroughly some global practices of inspiring models of transforming into car-free cities around the world. This review aims to identify the success measures for the transformation of a car-free city through investigating the challenges that affected the adoption of the transformation process. This would potentially guide governments and policymakers to select the approach that copes effectively with the cultural, social, geographical, and economic characteristics of their countries.