Disinterested Friends? European advisers in Siam at the turn of the twentieth century (original) (raw)

The West and Siam's quest for modenity

Southeast Asia Research, 2009

This paper examines the interactions that occurred between Westerners and the Siamese elite in the nineteenth century. The author contends that the perceived superiority of Western science and knowledge came not as a result of its being Western as such, but rather as a consequence of the Siamese elite's secure political position in terms of its physical and intellectual powers. The adoption of Western knowledge was measured against the truth of Theravada Buddhism and Buddhist political ideas. Western knowledge and science thus provided the ruling classes with a modern perception of themselves and the world. Nevertheless, the persistence of Siamese sakdina [feudal] social relations ultimately prevented complete modernization. Modernity therefore ended up in the hands of the elite and did not extend to the wider populace.

Going Beyond the Tropes of 'Friendship' and 'Modernization': Internal Colonialism in Siam and Scandinavia in the Age of Empire

Scandinavian Journal of History, 2024

This article contributes to a reconceptualization of the relationship between Siam and Scandinavia at the turn of the twentieth century. At that time, the relationship was manifested by the presence of a large group of Scandinavian, mainly Danish, entrepreneurs and professionals in Siam and repeated visits between the royal houses in Siam and the Scandinavian countries. The tropes of friendship and modernization dominate the main representation of the relationship. In accordance with this representation the Scandinavians were not perceived as a colonial threat to the Siamese rulers but co-producers of a modern and independent Siam. This narrative, created both by the Scandinavians and Siamese, reproduces a dominant royalist narrative in Thai historical writing that presents the absolute monarchy as a disinterested elite who launched a series of reforms to modernize Siam and safeguard the country against foreign encroachment. With reference to a revisionist tradition in Thai historical writing, we argue that Scandinavian–Siamese relations at the turn of the twentieth century needs to be accentuated in relation to the Siamese royal elite’s project of internal colonialism.

The significance of personal contacts between the Russian imperial family and the royal court of Siam in the late 19th-early 20th centuries

2009

By examining the historical context of colonialism and imperialism at the end of the 19th- beginning of the 20th century, the thesis aims to distinguish the place and role of personal contacts between the Russian Imperial Family and the Siamese Court in the turbulent circumstances of colonial rivalry over Siam. The major goal of the thesis is to enhance a better understanding of the reasons for the inception of close relationships between the Russian Empire and Siam at that period of time and the significance of this friendship in the history of both states. In this respect, the thorough documentary analysis applied in the research methodology is greatly enriched by a vast number of Russian scholarly resources and historical documents that provide valuable information and shed more light on the historical realities in which the countries developed mutual interest towards each other. The research finds that in spite of not having any colonial claims in Southeast Asia, the Russian Emp...

THE DISCOURSE OF HIERARCHY: A STUDY OF BRITISH WRITINGS ON SIAM, c. 1820-1918.

This MA thesis examines the relationship between Britain and Siam (modern-day Thailand) during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries through three events: the East India Company trade mission in 1821-1822, the Burma-Siam-China railway scheme in the 1890s, and the development of Siamese railways from the 1890s to the 1910s. The aim of this thesis is to “relocate” the British in Siam in various ways, and in various spaces, texts, and discourses. The focus in particular is on the rhetorical strategies that British authors used to describe Siam and where they thought Siam was located in the hierarchy of civilizations. The sources used include travel writings, their reviews, fiction, and British Foreign Office documents. These writings are contextualized within the geographical, political, economic, and cultural situations of their times.

Filip Grzegorzewski, Reinforcing the European Pivot to Asia, in Europe in the Asian Century, Axel Berkofsky, Warsaw

Europe in the Asian Century, 2014

While Asian powers have numerous “strategic partnerships” with European states, they do not perceive Europe as a ‘real’ strategic partner. This has a negative impact on Europe’s economic interests, security interests, and prestige. Europe is capable of playing an important role in Asia-Pacific affairs and our tools in the region (diplomacy, economy, know-how, culture) are growing in importance. Proceedings of a joint seminar of demosEUROPA – Centre For European Strategy, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in Poland and the Warsaw office of the European Council on Foreign Relations.

Asia. China and ASEAN. Diplomacy during the Cold War and after. By RABINDRA SEN. Howrah: Manuscript India, 2002. Pp. 189. Notes, Bibliography, Index

Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2004

Rabindra Sen's book on China-ASEAN relations appears to have two overall aims: to review China's diplomacy towards Southeast Asia from the Cold War onwards and to question the extent to which Chinese diplomacy is determined by China-US relations. The author therefore establishes within these aims a substantial task, given the time period concerned and the complexity of overlapping bilateral relationships. To tackle the task, the book's structure is divided into seven main chapters dealing with Chinese diplomacy towards ASEAN from the Cold War period to the present. Chapters 1 and 2 deal with Chinese diplomacy towards ASEAN during the Cold War, and post-Cold War diplomacy and threat perceptions respectively. Chapter 1 ostensibly serves as background detail to later chapters, and does not review this period in any detail. The focus is placed on the period after the fall of Saigon in 1975 and the developments in the triangular relationship between the US, China and ASEAN following the withdrawal of US troops from Vietnam and the invasion of Cambodia by Vietnamese forces. Sen concludes that 'China's economic diplomacy towards Southeast Asia during the Cold War years was anaemic and did not become as significant a component of its policy as it is known to have been since the end of the Cold War' (p. 23). Chapter 2 rightly notes the profound shift that occurred following the fall of the Soviet Union in 1989 and the ensuing reduction of Soviet influence in Southeast Asia. Sen argues that in the postwar period, 'China's desire to forge a partnership with the countries in Southeast Asia has been designed to limit the influence of the United States' (p. 29). Thus the chapter proceeds to review China-ASEAN relations during the 1990s through the lens of US-China relations, with some space devoted to US missile defence policy, arm sales to Taiwan, the role of Japan and China's emergent foreign policy objectives. There is little direct discussion of China-ASEAN relations in this chapter, the point being to explain why ASEAN took on greater strategic importance for Beijing in the 1990s: that is, to ensure a stable external environment to promote economic growth and modernisation, and restore its territorial integrity. Chapter 3 then turns to the issue of 'Adjustments in Chinese policy', reviewing the two contentious issues of Beijing's past links with Communist parties in Asia, and Chinese populations in ASEAN. China's position on the South China Sea and the ASEAN Nuclear Weapons Free Zone (ANWFZ) is also dealt with in terms of how China has 'introduced modifications' in its policies 'in the hope of removing or

The Art of Thai Diplomacy: Parables of Alliance

Pacific Affairs, 2022

This paper argues that a pragmatist theory of international relations, combined with parables of alliance formation from local proverbs and literary classics, best explains the art of Thai diplomacy from a historical perspective. Notably avoiding Western colonization, the Thais have enjoyed relative sovereignty and independence throughout their history. Rather than balancing, bandwagoning, or hedging, our study finds that Thailand has deliberately leveraged asymmetrical partnerships between often-opposed great powers and more symmetrical partnerships with less powerful states and multilateral organizations in order to maintain its physical and identitybased ontological security. We draw our empirical evidence from four historical periods: the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, World War II, the Cold War, and the post-Cold War modern era. Our findings can be applied to other Southeast Asian states and their own parables of alliance.