"Foregrounding contingency in caste-based dominance Ambedkar, hegemony, and the Pariah concept" (Philosophy and Social Criticism, 2018, vol. 44 issue 8) (original) (raw)

Philosophy and Social Criticism, 2018

Abstract

This paper focuses on how revolts against caste-based oppression in India have been made invisible due to conceptual legacies in European social and political theory. Weber’s and Arendt’s conceptualization of Pariah agency is a case in point. Arendt’s main understanding of Pariah agency is individualized and inadequate to study freedom struggles among untouchable castes. This article argues that one not only needs to move away from analyzing individual to collective action, but it is also crucial to foreground how collective mobilization among excluded groups has focused on contingencies that embed a system of domination. Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar’s critique of caste-based domination in India is noteworthy in this regard; he foregrounds how the distinction between “Touchables” and “Untouchables” in the caste system is both embedded and contingent. Focusing on untouchability in India, Ambedkar offers insights into hegemonic analyses of social exclusion, human rights articulations before the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and add value to current debates in post-foundational thought and transnational analysis.

Dag Erik Berg hasn't uploaded this paper.

Let Dag Erik know you want this paper to be uploaded.

Ask for this paper to be uploaded.