Artistic Politics of the Drone (original) (raw)

Abstract

The shape reminds of a little spaceship, the sound feels uncanny—like a swarm of bees. Its movement seems beautifully shy and aggressive at the same time and its cyborg-like nature seems somehow human. Drones are the centerpiece of my current research and artistic practice and I realized the dangers and potential dilemmas first hand. One day, my drone just disappeared. I lost the connection. The drone took off as usual, then suddenly accelerated and turned towards the middle of a lake as if it had a mind of its own. It turned right and was gone. Maybe someone else hacked the remote, maybe it was a technical glitch, maybe the drone had taken control over itself. When looking up the word “drone” one reads about recent collisions with planes and the horrific reality of drone strikes. But drones also provide new forms for artistic expression and journalistic investigation. Drawn by both the threatening and beautiful aspects of these new technologies, I am trying to further explore our relationship with drones through my arts practice but also through a theoretical approach. The German philosopher Martin Heidegger has argued that we will never be able to explore our relation to technology as long as we think about it as something only technological. Thought to the end, this would mean that we remain unfree, chained to the technology, no matter if we approve it or deny it. The most dangerous thing would be to see technology as something neutral, because then we would be completely at the mercy of it and remain blind for its essence. Instead, we should be questioning technology. Heidegger’s idea of the essence of technology is both technical and poetic. In the essence, he sees a disclosure rather than a mean. One way of approaching this issue with Heidegger is by art, as this area is connected to technology but completely different to it at the same time. Thus the interest in researching about the drone lies in exploring a new technological tool and perspective which I think could develop into a new practice of contemporary art. Against the backdrop of these thoughts, it is vital to shift our focus away from attempts to control these technologies and push aside fears that they could control us one day. Rather we should be questioning these new forms of technology and try to understand their essence, in terms of their origin, their relation to the human and our common future. Heidegger’s advice seems topically relevant, at a time in which we seem to sleepwalk into a future of observation and control. In social but also political terms, it is essential to reflect on how this future would look like, as we can expect the use of drones in logistic, military and other areas to increase significantly. This not only means raising questions on ethical and legally issues amongst many others but more import: How this will affect being human in general?

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (15)

  1. James Bridle, Drone Shadow 002, Istanbul, 2012, Photo Credit: James Bridle / booktwo.org References Barber, George: The Freestone Drone, Waterside Gallery Website. (Jan 23, 2017) http://www.waterside-contemporary.com/exhibitions/the- freestone-drone/ Buffenstein, Alyssa: Is This Drone the Next Cy Twombly? (Jan 08, 2018) https://creators.vice.com/en\_uk/article/yp5k5x/mit-flying- drone-drawing-machine Brechensbauer, Axel: The Peace Drone. Personal Website. (Jan 09, 2018) http://mynameisaxel.com/Proposals Bridle, James: "The New Aesthetics and its Politics." In: Kholeif, Omar: You are Here. Art after the Internet. 20-27 Manchester : Cornerhouse, 2014, 20-27 Center for the Study of the Drone at Bard College. Website (Jan 24, 2018) http://dronecenter.bard.edu Chamayou, Grégoire: A theory of the drone. New York: The New Press, 2015
  2. Chamyou, Grégoire: Drone Theory. Penguin Books, 2015
  3. Crandall, Jordan: Ontology of the Drone. In: Wombell, Paul: The automated Image. 196-206. Kerber. 2013
  4. Dagennais, Francine: The biomachinic Phylum: The Drones in the Hive, Implications for contemporary Art. In: Wombell, Paul: The automated Image. 184-194. Kerber. 2013
  5. Davies-Crook, Susanna: Art in the drone age. Dazed Website. (Oct 22nd, 2017) http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/16183/1/ art-in-the-drone-age Docksey, Lesley: Old and New Wars: "Dehumanizing" War. Armies facing Armies no longer happens? Global Research (Jan 23, 2018) http://www.globalresearch.ca/old-and-new- wars-dehumanizing-war-killing-at-a-distance/5318115 Federal Aviation Administration. Aerospace Forecast. Fiscal Years. 2017-2037 (Dec 12, 2017) https://www.faa.gov/data\_research/aviation/aerospace\_ forecasts/media/FY2017-37_FAA_Aerospace_Forecast.pdf
  6. Greene, Daniel: Drone Vision, Surveillance & Society 13(2): 233-249. (Nov 7,2017) https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and- society/article/view/drone_vision/drone_vis IOCOSE. In Times of Peace. Press Release 2016. (Nov 7, 2017) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CnX8ie-Zuaa- BsY2ChZGaGmIERwXYO-x6zjtdbD6DcI/edit International Human Rights and Conclift Resolution Clinic (Stanford Law School) and Global Justice Clinic (NYU School of Law), Living under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan (Dec 17, 2017) http://chrgj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Living-Under- Drones.pdf Kholeif, Omar: You are Here. Art after the Internet. Manchester: Cornerhouse, 2014
  7. Michael Haas, Drone, Documentary, directed by Tonje Hessen Schei. Norway: Flimmer Film, 2014
  8. Heidegger, Martin: The question concerning technology, and other essays. New York & London: Garland Publishing Inc, 1977
  9. Kholeif, Omar: You are Here. Art after the Internet. Manchester: Cornerhouse, 2014
  10. Lissoni, Andrea: How Not to Be Seen: A Fucking Didactic Educational .MOV File, Summary, Tate Modern Website (Dec 15, 2017) http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/steyerl- how-not-to-be-seen-a-fucking-didactic-educational-mov- file-t14506
  11. Lawrence, Cole: Drone, Documentary, directed by Tonje Hessen Schei. Norway: Flimmer Film, 2014 Nimac: Open Call, Drone Vision, Online PDF (Nov 20, 2017) http://nimac.org.cy/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/OPEN- CALL-DRONE-VISION-GR.pdf
  12. Trevor Paglen: Seeing is Believing: An Interview with Trevor Paglen, Interview by Seth Crucio. Daily Serving (Jan 07, 2011) http://www.altmansiegel.com/tpaglen2show/ tpaglen2showpress2.pdf Ratti, Carlo: Paint by Drone, Carlo Ratti Website (Nov 18, 2017) https://www.carloratti.com/project/paint-by-drone/ Rohde, David: The Drone War, Reuters (Jan 26, 2012) http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/26/us-david-rohde- drone-wars-idUSTRE80P11I20120126.
  13. Rothstein, Adam: The Complexities of Drones in Art, Creators Vice (Nov 21, 2014) https://creators.vice.com/en\_uk/article/pgqa3k/longreads- the-complexities-of-drones-in-art The Bureau of Investigative Journalism: Pakistan Drone Statistics Visualized, 2012. Website. (Nov 18th, 2017) https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2012-07-02/ pakistan-drone-statistics-visualised Tuck, Sarah: Skype Conversation with the author, 2017. Valand Academy: Drone Vision: Warfare, Surveillance, Protest, Valand Academy Website (Dec 8, 2017) https://akademinvaland.gu.se/english/research-/research- projects/drone-vision--warfare--surveillance--protest
  14. Wombell, Paul: The automated Image. Kerber, 2013
  15. Young, Liam: I Spy with my Machine Eye. E-flux Website. (Nov 18th, 2017) http://www.e-flux.com/program/95984/liam-young-i-spy- with-my-machine-eye-nbsp/