Eustathius over de Homerische goden, de plausibiliteit van de Ilias en de deskundigheid van Homerus. In: Lampas 51.1 (2018), pp. 43-60. (original) (raw)
This article explores the role of the gods in the Iliad as analysed by Eustathius of Thessaloniki in his Commentary on the Iliad. Eustathius aims to identify the principles and techniques that underlie Homer’s successful composition and to reconstruct, as it were, Homer’s composition process. In this way, he intends to familiarise his target audience, twelfth-century authors of rhetorical prose, with Homer’s admirable methods so that they can imitate them in their own writings. Eustathius interprets the gods as devices in the hands of the poet to steer his composition in the desired direction, to imbue it with rhetorical plausibility, and to foreground his skilfulness. Homer uses the gods in four ways: 1) by means of divine interventions, Homer maintains plausibility whenever he takes risks for the sake of rhetorical virtuosity; 2) the poet employs divine plans to motivate the course of events; 3) as allegories of the poet’s intellectual capacities the gods reveal authorial deliberations about the course of the Iliad; 4) the composition of the Iliad is partly determined by the meaning of the gods in terms of natural and ethical allegory. Eustathius thus presents Homer as a self-conscious author and shapes him, we may assume, in the image of the ideal Byzantine author, or perhaps that of himself.
Related papers
Nonostante l’esclusione dell’Egitto dallo schema storiografico della translatio imperii, molti storici di età ellenistica e imperiale furono evidentemente consapevoli dell’importanza dell’Egitto nella storia universale; inoltre, suscitava interesse l’incidenza della sapienza egiziana sulle altre culture del Mediterraneo antico, in particolare sulla Grecia. Nel primo libro della sua Bibliotheca historica, Diodoro Siculo riconosce l’importanza della storia e della civiltà dell’Egitto. Secondo Diodoro, l’antico Egitto contribuì in maniera significativa allo sviluppo dell’umanità attraverso la trasmissione del sapere, della scienza, della tecnologia. Culture-heroes come Osiride viaggiarono per il mondo portando sapienza dall’Egitto alle altre culture. Di conseguenza, nella storia d’Egitto la translatio studii, il fenomeno di diffusione del sapere, precede l’egemonia politica e militare sul mondo. D’altra parte, molto prima degli Assiri, il faraone Sesostri conquistò il dominio su Africa, Asia ed Europa. Dopo Diodoro, questa rappresentazione dell’antico Egitto fu pure accolta dalla cronografia e dalla storiografia universale cristiana. L’Egitto svolge un ruolo molto importante nella prima cronaca cristiana, le Chronographiae di Sesto Giulio Africano (221 d.C.). Ancora nel VI secolo, gli storici protobizantini – ad esempio, Giovanni Malala, Pietro Patrizio, Giovanni di Antiochia – consideravano l’antico Egitto come culla della civiltà occidentale. La Grecia e Roma, in particolare, derivavano la loro sapienza dall’Egitto. Inoltre, la storia degli antichi faraoni rappresentava un suggestivo esempio per la riflessione sul declino degli imperi.
2005
In the 1950'sand 1960's, the Roman Catholic priest Han Fortmann (1912-1970) was the first to teach such not uncontroversial topics as the psychology and anthropology of religion at the Catholic University, at Nijmegen. However, through his newspaper articles and his radio broadcasts, his influence reached far beyond Academia. Articulating his own views and doubts on contemporary (Dutch) Catholicism, he became a popular figure, an icon almost of critical Catholicism. As this essay shows, both in his major study, Als Ziende de Onzienlijke (1964-1968) and in subsequent publications, he felt increasingly disenchanted with the cultural and moral-religious vitality of the western world. Consequently, he stressed the need for an exploration of and a dialogue with eastern religions, mainly Hinduism and Buddhism, to regenerate the life and culture of western man, to show him the way from the 'I' to the 'not-I'. His own research seems to have led him to accept that man...
Graaf Willem I van Holland (1202-1222): ridderschap en machtspolitiek
BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review, 2001
Count William I of Holland (1203-1222): Chivalry and Power PoliticsWilliam I, Count of Holland (1203-1222) is generally known as a chivalric prince who was more interested in the international theatre of war than in governing his own estate. William did indeed participate in two crusades (1189-1191 and 1217-1219), one major 'European' battle (Bouvines 1214) and a French invasion in England (1216). However, these 'chivalric' activities did not stem from sheer personal impetuosity and a lust for adventure. In all cases, political motives played a role. Chivalric behavior went hand in hand with pragmatic power politics.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.