Differences in the Association between Segment and Language: Early Bilinguals Pattern with Monolinguals and Are Less Accurate than Late Bilinguals (original) (raw)

Abstract

Early bilinguals often show as much sensitivity to L2-specific contrasts as monolingual speakers of the L2, but most work on cross-language speech perception has focused on isolated segments, and typically only on neighboring vowels or stop contrasts. In tasks that include sounds in context, listeners' success is more variable, so segment discrimination in isolation may not adequately represent the phonetic detail in stored representations. The current study explores the relationship between language experience and sensitivity to segmental cues in context by comparing the categorization patterns of monolingual English listeners and early and late Spanish–English bilinguals. Participants categorized nonce words containing different classes of English-and Spanish-specific sounds as being more English-like or more Spanish-like; target segments included phonemic cues, cues for which there is no analogous sound in the other language, or phonetic cues, cues for which English and Spanish share the category but for which each language varies in its phonetic implementation. Listeners' language categorization accuracy and reaction times were analyzed. Our results reveal a largely uniform categorization pattern across listener groups: Spanish cues were categorized more accurately than English cues, and phonemic cues were easier for listeners to categorize than phonetic cues. There were no differences in the sensitivity of monolinguals and early bilinguals to language-specific cues, suggesting that the early bilinguals' exposure to Spanish did not fundamentally change their representations of English phonology. However, neither did the early bilinguals show more sensitivity than the monolinguals to Spanish sounds. The late bilinguals however, were significantly more accurate than either of the other groups. These findings indicate that listeners with varying exposure to English and Spanish are able to use language-specific cues in a nonce-word language categorization task. Differences in how, and not only when, a language was acquired may influence listener sensitivity to more difficult cues, and the advantage for phonemic cues may reflect the greater salience of categories unique to each language. Implications for foreign-accent categorization and cross-language speech perception are discussed, and future directions are outlined to better understand how salience varies across language-specific phonemic and phonetic cues.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (60)

  1. Allen, J. S., and Miller, J. L. (2004). Listener sensitivity to individual talker di erences in voice-onset-time. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 3171-3183.
  2. Amengual, M. (2014). The perception and production of language-specific mid- vowel contrasts: shifting the to the bilingual individual in early language input conditions. Int. J. Biling. 20, 133-152. doi: 10.1177/1367006914544988
  3. Amengual, M. (2015). The perception of language-specific phonetic categories does not guarantee accurate phonological representations in the lexicon of early bilinguals. Appl. Psycholinguist. 1-31. doi: 10.1017/S0142716415000557
  4. Anthony, J. L., and Francis, D. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14, 255-259. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005. 00376.x
  5. Best, C. T. (1991). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: a perceptual assimilation model. Haskins Lab. Status Rep. Speech Res. SR-107/108, 1-30.
  6. Bialystok, E. (2001). Metalinguistic aspects of bilingual processing. Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 21, 169-181.
  7. Boersma, P., and Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer Program]. Version 5.3.32. Available at: http://www.praat.org/ Bradlow, A. (1995). A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1916-1924. doi: 10.1121/1.412064
  8. Bradlow, A., Clopper, C., Smiljanic, R., and Walter, M. A. (2010). A perceptual phonetic similarity space for languages: evidence from five native language listener groups. Speech Commun. 52, 930-942. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2010.06.003
  9. Bruck, M., and Genesee, F. (1995). Phonological awareness in young second language learners. J. Child Lang. 22, 307-324. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900
  10. Carlson, M. T., Goldrick, M., Blasingame, M., and Fink, A. (2015). Navigating conflicting phonotactic constraints in bilingual speech perception. Biling. Lang. Cogn. 1-16. doi: 10.1017/S1366728915000334
  11. Chan, C. L. (2014). NUsub-db: Northwestern University Subject Database [Web Application].
  12. Clark, E. V. (2003). First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Clopper, C. G., and Pisoni, D. B. (2004). Homebodies and army brats: some e ects of early linguistic experience and residential history on dialect categorization. Lang. Var. Change 16, 31-48. doi: 10.1017/S0954394504161036
  14. Clopper, C. G., and Pisoni, D. B. (2007). Free classification of regional dialects of American English. J. Phon. 35, 421-438. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2006.06.001
  15. Clopper, C. G., Pisoni, D. B., and de Jong, K. (2005). Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 1661-1676. doi: 10.1121/1.2000774
  16. Costa, A., and Caramazza, A. (1999). Is lexical selection in bilingual speech production language-specific? Further evidence from Spanish-English and English-Spanish bilinguals. Biling. Lang. Cogn. 2, 231-244. doi: 10.1017/S1366728999000334
  17. Cutler, A., Weber, A., Smits, R., and Cooper, N. (2004). Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 3668-3678. doi: 10.1121/1.1810292
  18. D ąbrowska, E., and Street, J. A. (2006). Individual di erences in language attainment: comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Lang. Sci. 28, 604-615. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2005.11.014
  19. Diehl, R. L., and Walsh, M. A. (1989). An auditory basis for the stimulus-length e ect in the perception of stops and glides. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 2154-2164. doi: 10.1121/1.397864
  20. Dodd, B., Holm, A., Hua, Z., and Crosbie, S. (2003). Phonological development: a normative study of British English-speaking children. Clin. Linguist. Phon. 17, 617-643. doi: 10.1080/0269920031000111348
  21. Escudero, P. (2006). "The phonological and phonetic development of new vowel contrasts in Spanish learners of English, " in English With a Latin Beat: Studies in Portuguese/Spanish-English Interphonology, Studies in Bilingualism, Vol. 31, eds B. O. Baptista and M. A. Watkins (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 149-161.
  22. Flege, J. E. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 692-707. doi: 10.1121/1.391256
  23. Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of "new" and "similar" phones in a foreign language: evidence for the e ect of equivalence classification. J. Phon. 15, 47-55.
  24. Flege, J. E. (1991). Age of learning a ects the authenticity of voice onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 395-411. doi: 10.1121/1.400473
  25. Flege, J. E. (1995). "Second language speech learning: theory, findings, and problems, " in Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross- Language Research, ed. W. Strange (Timonium, MD: York Press), 233-277.
  26. Flege, J. E. (2007). "Language contact in bilingualism: phonetic system interactions, " in Laboratory Phonology 9, eds J. Cole and J. Hualde (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 353-382.
  27. Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., and Jang, S. (1997a). E ects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. J. Phon. 25, 437-470. doi: 10.1121/1.3466879
  28. Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., and Nozawa, T. (1997b). Amount of native-language (L1) use a ects the pronunciation of an L2. J. Phon. 25, 169-186. doi: 10.1006/jpho.1996.0040
  29. Flege, J. E., and MacKay, I. R. A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Stud. Second Lang. Acquis. 26, 1-34. doi: 10.1159/000235659
  30. Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., and Meador, D. (1999a). Native Italian speakers' perception and production of English vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2973- 2987. doi: 10.1121/1.428116
  31. Flege, J. E., and Munro, M. J. (1994). The word unit in second language speech production and perception. Stud. Second Lang. Acquis. 16, 381-411. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100013437
  32. Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., and Fox, R. A. (1994). Auditory and categorical e ects on cross-language vowel perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3623-3641. doi: 10.1121/1.409931
  33. Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., and Liu, S. (1999b). Age constraints on second- language acquisition. J. Mem. Lang. 41, 78-104. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2638
  34. Gelman, A., Lee, D., and Guo, J. (2015). A probabilistic programming language for bayesian inference and optimization. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 40, 530-543. doi: 10.3102/1076998615606113
  35. Gertken, L. M., Amengual, M., and Birdsong, D. (2014). "Assessing language dominance with the Bilingual Language Profile, " in Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA, eds P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds, and H. Hilton (Bristol: Multilingual Matters), 208-225.
  36. Harnsberger, J. D., Shrivastav, R., Brown, W. S. Jr., Rothman, H., and Hollien, H. (1997). Speaking rate and fundamental frequency as speech cues to perceived age. J. Voice 22, 58-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.07.004
  37. Hualde, J. I. (2005). The of Spanish. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Johnson, K. (1997). "Speech perception without speaker normalization, " in Talker Variability in Speech Processing, eds K. Johnson and J. W. Mullennix (New York, NY: Academic Press), 145-166.
  39. Klatt, D. H., and Klatt, L. C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 820-857. doi: 10.1121/1.398894
  40. Kondaurova, M. V., and Francis, A. L. (2008). The relationship between native allophonic experience with vowel duration and perception of the English tense/lax vowel contrast by Spanish and Russian listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 3959-3971. doi: 10.1121/1.2999341
  41. Kraljic, T., and Samuel, A. G. (2006). Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 262-268. doi: 10.3758/BF03193841
  42. Kraljic, T., and Samuel, A. G. (2007). Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 1-15. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0856-y
  43. Mack, M. (1989). Consonant and vowel perception and production: early English- French bilinguals and English monolinguals. Percept. Psychophys. 46, 187-200. doi: 10.3758/BF03204982
  44. Mendez, A. (1982). Production of American English and Spanish vowels. Lang. Speech 25, 191-197. doi: 10.1177/002383098202500206
  45. Munro, M. J., and Derwing, T. M. (2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 Speech: the role of speaking rate. Stud. Second Lang. Acquis. 23, 451-468.
  46. Nygaard, L. C., and Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Percept. Psychphys. 60, 355-376. doi: 10.3758/BF032 06860
  47. Pennington, B. F., van Orden, G. C., Smith, S. D., Green, P. A., and Haith, M. M. (1990). Phonological processing skills and deficits in adult dyslexics. Child Dev. 61, 1753-1778. doi: 10.2307/1130836
  48. Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2002). "Word-specific phonetics, " in Laboratory Phonology, Vol. 7, eds C. Gussenhoven and N. Warner (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 101-139.
  49. Pisoni, D. B. (1977). Identification and discrimination of the relative voice onset time of two component tones: implication for voicing perception in stops. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 1352-1361. doi: 10.1121/1.38 1409 Psychology Software Tools (2010). Psychology Software Tools, Inc. E-Prime 2.0. Available at: http://www.pstnet.com
  50. Recasens, D. (2004). Darkness in [l] as a scalar phonetic property: implications for phonology and articulatory control. Clin. Linguist. Phon. 18, 593-603. doi: 10.1080/02699200410001703556
  51. Recasens, D. (2012). A cross-language acoustic study of initial and final allophones of [l]. Speech Commun. 54, 368-383. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2011. 10.001
  52. RStudio Team (2015). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc. Boston, MA: RStudio Team. Available at: http://www.rstudio.com/ Sebastián-Gallés, N., Echeverría, S., and Bosch, L. (2005). The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. J. Mem. Lang. 52, 240-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.001
  53. Sebastián-Gallés, N., and Soto-Faraco, S. (1999). Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals. Cognition 72, 111-123. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00024-4
  54. Shook, A., and Marian, V. (2013). The Bilingual language interaction network for comprehension of speech. Biling. Lang. Cogn. 16, 304-324. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000466
  55. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., and van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 64, 583-639. doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00353
  56. Strand, E. A. (1999). Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 18, 86-99. doi: 10.1177/0261927X99018001006
  57. Strand, E. A., and Johnson, K. (1996). "Gradient and visual speaker normalization in the perception of fricatives, " in Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology: Results of the 3rd KONVENS Conference, Bielefeld, ed. D. Gibbon (Berlin: Mouton), 14-26.
  58. Tracy, E. C., Bainter, S. A., and Satariano, N. P. (2015). Judgments of self- identified gay and heterosexual male speakers: which phonemes are the most salient in determining sexual orientation? J. Phon. 52, 13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.04.001
  59. Vieru, B., Boula de Mareüil, P., and Adda-Decker, M. (2011). Characterisation and identification of non-native French accents. Speech Commun. 53, 292-310. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2010.10.002
  60. Witteman, M. J., Weber, A., and McQueen, J. M. (2013). Foreign accent strength and listener familiarity with an accent codetermine speed of perceptual adaptation. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 75, 537-556. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012- 0404-y