Using the 'regime shift' concept in addressing social-ecological change (Geographical Research 56 (1):26-41) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Conceptualizing, Observing, and Influencing Social–Ecological Transitions
Ecology and Society, 2009
This article creates a meeting ground between two distinct and fairly elaborate research traditions dealing with social "transitions": the Dutch societal transitions management approach, and the Viennese sociometabolic transitions approach. Sharing a similar understanding of sustainability transitions-namely as major transformational changes of system characteristics-and a background epistemology of complex systems, autopoeisis, and evolutionary mechanisms, they address the subject from different angles: one approach asks how transformative changes happen and what they look like, and the other approach tries answer the question of how to bring them about. The Viennese approach is almost exclusively analytical and deals with a macro ("landscape") level of human history with a time scale of decades to centuries; the Dutch approach is based on intervention experiences and deals with a shorter time frame (decades) of micro-meso-macro levels of industrial societies. From both their respective angles, they contribute to some of the key questions of sustainability research, namely: how can a transformative change toward sustainability be distinguished from other types of social change? By which mechanisms can obstacles, path dependencies, and adverse interests be overcome? And what are the key persistent problems that call for such a transition?
Regime shifts in social-ecological systems
2019
Stewardship considers new ways of understanding, reconnecting to and caring for the biosphere (the global ecological system integrating all living beings and their relationships). Stewardship emerges from the care, knowledge and agency of individuals, communities, organizations and governments.
Redefining ecological trajectories: Paradigms and beyond
Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Humanities and Education, 2019
This paper is an attempt to analyse the onset of the issue of ecological paradigm and how it is context specific. The paradox of the western dissent of ideas and the newer perspective which sheds light upon the spaces which were never discussed before; it enables a fresh perspective through the methodological approach of relational sociology. On the onset of Paradigms as ways of categorising stories into groups, this paper is an attempt at unfolding the limitations to the concept of an archtype through the eyes of a social phenomenon. It allows the paradox of ideas which holds on to the archtype nature of a concept to allow itself to negotiate through the process of parallel developments, infact open itself to a newer idea on its own.
Susan Paulson. 2017. Degrowth: culture, power and change. Journal of Political Ecology 24: 425-448.
Harmful environmental consequences of growth have been rigorously documented and widely publicized throughout the past half-century. Yet, the quantity of matter and energy used by human economies continues to increase by the minute, while governments and businesses continue to promise and to prioritize further economic growth. Such a paradox raises questions about how we humans change course. This introduction to a Special Section offers a new theoretical approach to change, together with glimpses of adaptations underway around the world. It directs attention away from individual decision-making and toward systems of culture and power through which socialized humans and socioecological worlds are (re)produced, sustained and adapted. Potential for transformative change is found in habitual practices through which skills, perspectives, denials and desires are viscerally embodied, and in cultural systems (economic, religious, gender and other) that govern those practices and make them meaningful. Case studies reviewed illuminate diverse communities acting to maintain old and to forge new moral and material worlds that prioritize well-being, equity and sustainability rather than expansion. This article endeavors to galvanize change by conceptualizing degrowth, by decolonizing worldviews of expansionist myths and values, and by encouraging connections between science and activism, north and south. Les conséquences environnementales négatives de la croissance ont été rigoureusement documentées et largement médiatisées pendant un demi-siècle. Pourtant, la quantité de matière et d'énergie utilisée par les économies humaines continue d'augmenter de minute en minute, tandis que les gouvernements et les entreprises continuent d'accorder la priorité et de promettre une croissance économique accrue. Un tel paradoxe soulève des questions sur la manière dont les humains changent. Cette introduction à une Section Spéciale propose une nouvelle approche théorique au changement, ainsi que des aperçus d'adaptations en cours dans le monde. Elle détourne l'attention de la prise de décision individuelle vers les systèmes de culture et de pouvoir par lesquels les êtres socialisés et les mondes socio-écologiques sont (re)produits, soutenus et adaptés. Une attention particulière est accordée aux pratiques habituelles par lesquelles les compétences, les perspectives, les démentis et les désirs sont viscéralement incarnés, et aux systèmes culturels (économiques, religieux, de genre et autres) qui régissent ces pratiques et les rendent significatives. Les études de cas ont permis d'éclairer les expériences de diverses communautés qui agissent pour préserver l'ancienne et de forger de nouveaux mondes moraux et matériels qui ne sont pas axés sur l'expansion, mais plutôt le bien-être, l'équité et la durabilité. Cet article s'efforce de soutenir le changement en conceptualisant le décroissement; décoloniser les visions du monde à partir de mythes et de valeurs expansionnistes; et encourager les liens entre la science et l'activisme, au nord et au sud. Las consecuencias ambientales negativas del crecimiento han sido rigurosamente documentadas y ampliamente publicitadas durante medio siglo. Sin embargo, la cantidad de materia y energía utilizada por las economías humanas sigue aumentando a cada minuto, mientras que los gobiernos y las empresas siguen priorizando y prometiendo un mayor crecimiento económico. Tal paradoja plantea preguntas acerca de cómo los humanos cambian de rumbo. Esta introducción a una sección especial ofrece un nuevo enfoque teórico para el cambio, y vislumbra adaptaciones en curso alrededor del mundo. Dirija la atención no a la toma de decisión individual, sino hacia los sistemas de cultura y poder a través de los cuales los seres humanos socializados y los mundos socioecológicos son (re)producidos, sostenidos y adaptados. Se encuentra potencial de tranformación en las prácticas habituales a través de las cuales las habilidades, perspectivas, negaciones y deseos se encarnan visceralmente, y en los sistemas culturales (económicos, religiosos, de género y otros) que gobiernan esas prácticas y las hacen significativas. Los estudios de caso examinan las experiencias de diversas comunidades que actúan para mantener antiguos y forjar nuevos mundos prácticos, morales y materiales que no están orientados a la expansión, sino que priorizan el bienestar, la equidad y la sostenibilidad. Este artículo intenta apoyar el cambio mediante un esfuerzo para conceptualizar el decrecimiento; descolonizar las cosmovisiones, mitos y valores expansionistas; y alentar las conexiones entre la ciencia y el activismo, el norte y el sur.
The Regime Shifts Database: A Framework for Analyzing Regime Shifts in Social-Ecological Systems
2015
This paper presents the Regime Shifts Database (RSDB), a new online, open-access database that uses a novel consistent framework to systematically analyze regime shifts based on their impacts, key drivers, underlying feedbacks, and management options. The database currently contains 27 generic types of regime shifts, and over 300 specific case studies of a variety of regime shifts. These regime shifts occur across diverse types of systems and are driven by many different types of processes. Besides impacting provisioning and regulating services, our work shows that regime shifts substantially impact cultural and aesthetic ecosystem services. We found that social-ecological feedbacks are difficult to characterize and more work is needed to develop new tools and approaches to better understand social-ecological regime shifts. We hope that the database will stimulate further research on regime shifts and make available information that can be used in management, planning and assessment.
Regime shifts in the Anthropocene
F1000Research, 2013
Regime shifts are large, abrupt and often hard to reverse changes in the function and structure of socal-ecological systems. These regime shifts have been documented in a broad range of systems and ...
2011
Studies about human vulnerabilities to global socio-ecological changes abound; there is precise information on the risks that need to be urgently addressed to prevent major crises. In Latin America, the Andean region has been signaled as one with major risks. Nevertheless, current methodologies for observation, understanding, and management of socio-ecological systems are incomplete and insufficient, since these are developed without exchange and conversation between various relevant theoretical fields. Based upon a multi-paradigmatic approach, the aim of the paper is to set up the basis for an integral methodology for supporting self-management of socio-ecological systems by its key actors, mostly inspired in contributions from socio-ecological, institutional, and complexity theories. The article: 1) integrates the fields in discussion building a framework to observe and understand the phenomenon; 2) discuss the bases for a methodology to support communities from vulnerable SES to ...
2014. Studying the complexity of change: toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations. Ecology and Society 19(4): 54. http://dx.ABSTRACT. Faced with numerous seemingly intractable social and environmental challenges, many scholars and practitioners are increasingly interested in understanding how to actively engage and transform the existing systems holding such problems in place. Although a variety of analytical models have emerged in recent years, most emphasize either the social or ecological elements of such transformations rather than their coupled nature. To address this, first we have presented a definition of the core elements of a socialecological system (SES) that could potentially be altered in a transformation. Second, we drew on insights about transformation from three branches of literature focused on radical change, i.e., social movements, socio-technical transitions, and social innovation, and gave consideration to the similarities and differences with the current studies by resilience scholars. Drawing on these findings, we have proposed a framework that outlines the process and phases of transformative change in an SES. Future research will be able to utilize the framework as a tool for analyzing the alteration of social-ecological feedbacks, identifying critical barriers and leverage points and assessing the outcome of social-ecological transformations.