‘The Greek Left vis-à-vis the EU: From opposition to accommodation and back again’ (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Greek Left vis-a-vis the EU - Edinburgh conference paper
This paper studies the position of the main currents of the Greek Left vis-à-vis the European integration project. The first part analyses the politico-economic nature of this project and the main phases of its evolution. Its main argument is that it is an attempt to create a European imperialist bloc in the beginning as an ally to the US versus the Eastern Bloc but – particularly after the collapse of the latter – as an increasingly aggressive competitor to the US for imperialist primacy. The second part studies the relationship of Greek capitalism with the European integration project. Its central thesis is that Greek capital (being a second generation, middle level one with limited imperialist abilities) found in the accession to the European integration project its modern ‘Big Idea’ : it considered that its partnership with the more developed western European capitalisms – however unequal maybe - would signify its ascent in the world imperialist hierarchy. This plan, which passe...
Greece and the European Union Neo-liberalism and Its Discontents
In the first part of the present paper we shortly review the current situation in Greece, revealing the internal causes -recent and long-standing -as well as the origins relating to the global systemic crisis of our time. Subsequently, we discuss EU's recent transformation, from the new-Keynesian co-operation to the neo-liberal monetary Union. How did a period of convergence result into a period of diverging per capita income and deepening inequality in the member states? Why "price equalization" occurred prior to the equalization of income? How did the "European Acquis" for democratic legitimation convert into decisions taken by the majority of the participating funds (for instance in case of ESM)? Based on that, in the third part, we take a closer look into the positive/negative, direct/indirect effects on Greece, given the country's inconsistencies. Finally, conclude and we discuss specific policy alternatives, as well as proposals for further relevant research. (5.501 words)
Greece and the EU: capitalist crisis and imperialist rivalries
2010
This paper studies the relationship between Greek capitalism and the European Union in the light of the recent developments (i.e. the current global crisis and the fiscal and debt crisis of Greece). The first part analyses the turbulent historical course of Greek capitalism and its passage from phases of development to crises and waves of capitalist restructuring. In particular, it pinpoints its status as a second-generation middle-range capitalism with limited imperialist abilities. The second part analyses the position of Greek capitalism within the European imperialist bloc and the advantages but also the dangers stemming from its participation in it. It focuses especially on the waves of capitalist restructuring inaugurated after the 1973 crisis and their concomitant results and problems. The third part focuses on the current global crisis and how it has been expressed in Greece. It is depicted as a twin crisis, i.e. a combination of (a) the current global crisis (a crisis of overaccumulation of capital caused by the falling tendency of the rate of profit), with (b) particular Greek structural problems (most of them derived from its participation in the European imperialist bloc). The last part concludes with the proposal for a radical alternative to the policies of the EU and the Greek bourgeoisie. The main pillar of this proposal is the disengagement from the European imperialist integration process and the radical restructuring of the Greek economy towards a process of socialist transition.
This dissertation sets out to critically evaluate the Greek position as a nation-state, as well as the implications and benefits it has being a member of the European Union. The theoretical foundation that lies at the base of my dissertation, is one of the realist school of thought. The trending views in realism regarding the importance of International Organizations, such as the European Union, are divided into two parts. One is the idea that an International Organization only works in favor of the strongest member state, and all other members only serve as peons. Thus the smaller members states will never benefit fully from being involved in an International Organization, as their national agenda will not be prioritized, except if it coincides with the national interests of the largest member state.
The Abduction of Europa: Europeanism and Euroscepticism in Greece, 1974–2015
Rethinking Democratisation in Spain, Greece and Portugal, 2019
This chapter examines Greek Euroscepticism both at party and popular level from the country’s accession to the EC in 1981 to the signing of the Maastricht Treaty, by analysing the data from the biannual Eurobarometer surveys and the reading of parliamentary debates and the press. This diverse source base will allow the investigation of the forms through which the “framing” of Europe took place within the political and public discourse, and the impact the framing had on attitudes towards European integration. The interdisciplinary approach taken here will allow us to move beyond an interest-based approach and to investigate the diverse ways the EU was framed and understood as a political, cultural and economic project; how the EU gained and lost legitimacy; as well as the expectations and beliefs in the rise and fall of support for Greek EC membership.
This article presents new research on the Europeanness of Greek political elites under the economic crisis. It registers the views of a sample of 74 Greek Members of Parliament (MPs) on European integration and the handling of the economic crisis by the European Union (EU). The ENEC survey, which was conducted in 2014, shows that Greek MPs continue to be attached to Europe, but evaluate negatively the role of EU’s institutions during the economic crisis. They mostly view European integration positively, but are skeptical about the representativeness of EU organs. There is a discernible set of “core attitudes” which constitute the Europeanness of Greek MPs, but there is also a set of issues on which MPs are clearly divided. The dominant dimension of conflict within Greek political elites is the issue of economic austerity packages, i.e., the Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs), as since 2010 EU’s management of the crisis has become the epicenter of Greece’s domestic politics. The two party, SYRIZA-ANEL coalition government that was formed after the January 2015 elections was not a surprise given the close proximity of these two parties on their stance towards the MoUs and the EU.
An ever More Polarised Union: The Greek Problem and the Failure of EU Economic Governance
Though Greece accounts for only 1.2% of total GDP, the EU has found it impossible to bring about a solution to the crisis. More than five years after the first adjustment programme the Greek economy continues on its downward trajectory while political relations have become increasingly polarised. Meanwhile the highly controversial debate about the causes of the Greek malaise has degenerated into a re-enactment of the neoclassics versus Keynesians debate. While the EU locates the root cause of the problem in the slow pace of structural reforms that would liberate the Greek economy from its growth-stunting rigidities, the Greek government and a growing host of Keynesian critics laments the folly of applying austerity in a crisis. Yet, the Greek crisis can be solved neither by more austerity and structural reforms nor by Keynesian reflation. The core problem lies in a form of integration which has systematically weakened the Greek economy while simultaneously stabilising a clientelistic mode of interest intermediation through ample EU funds and easy access to credit. In order to establish a sustainable growth model, Greece would urgently need a substantial devaluation in combination with an interventionist industrial policy. Yet, such a form of differential integration is not palatable to the North West European creditor countries as it would pose a threat to their own export oriented growth model. But neither is such a model attractive to the Greek government as it would require a break with the clientelistic organisation of political power while simultaneously removing the scapegoat of the EU. Accordingly both the EU and Greece have manoeuvred themselves into a trap which makes a speedy recovery unlikely