Cyclin E2 Inhibition: A Potential Target For Cancer Therapy (original) (raw)
Related papers
Deregulation of Cyclin E2 expression and associated kinase activity in primary breast tumors
Oncogene, 2002
The increased expression of G 1 cyclins has been associated with the many types of human tumors. In primary solid tumors however, the expression and activity of cyclin E2, the newest member of the G 1 cyclin family, is largely unknown. In this study we have analysed the expression of the E-type cyclins in primary solid tumors from breast, lung, uterus, ovary, colon, and rectal tissues. Relative gene expression was analysed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (Taqman). The levels of cyclin E1 and cyclin E2 were significantly elevated (23 vs 38%, respectively) in primary breast tumor samples relative to normal breast tissue controls. We also observed an inverse correlation between the expression of cyclin E1/ E2 and estrogen receptor in breast tumors. Our results demonstrate that the expression and associated catalytic activity for both cyclin E1 and cyclin E2 is elevated in primary breast tumors when compared to normal breast tissue. The increased level of cyclin E2 in breast tumors suggests that, similar to cyclin E1, it may contribute to the pathogenesis of breast cancer.
Cyclin E, a Redundant Cyclin in Breast Cancer
Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 1996
Cyclin E is an important regulator of cell cycle progression that together with cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) 2 is crucial for the G 1 ͞S transition during the mammalian cell cycle. Previously, we showed that severe overexpression of cyclin E protein in tumor cells and tissues results in the appearance of lower molecular weight isoforms of cyclin E, which together with cdk2 can form a kinase complex active throughout the cell cycle. In this study, we report that one of the substrates of this constitutively active cyclin E͞cdk2 complex is retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product (pRb) in populations of breast cancer cells and tissues that also overexpress p16. In these tumor cells and tissues, we show that the expression of p16 and pRb is not mutually exclusive. Overexpression of p16 in these cells results in sequestering of cdk4 and cdk6, rendering cyclin D1͞cdk complexes inactive. However, pRb appears to be phosphorylated throughout the cell cycle following an initial lag, revealing a time course similar to phosphorylation of glutathione S-transferase retinoblastoma by cyclin E immunoprecipitates prepared from these synchronized cells. Hence, cyclin E kinase complexes can function redundantly and replace the loss of cyclin Ddependent kinase complexes that functionally inactivate pRb. In addition, the constitutively overexpressed cyclin E is also the predominant cyclin found in p107͞E2F complexes throughout the tumor, but not the normal, cell cycle. These observations suggest that overexpression of cyclin E in tumor cells, which also overexpress p16, can bypass the cyclin D͞cdk4-cdk6͞p16͞pRb feedback loop, providing yet another mechanism by which tumors can gain a growth advantage.
Cell Cycle, 2009
Low molecular weight (LMW) isoforms of cyclin E are post-translationally generated in breast cancer cells and are associated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis. In this study, the specificity of LMW cyclin E to cancer cells was determined by measuring cyclin E expression in tumor and non-tumor tissue from 340 breast cancer patients. Our results reveal the LMW isoforms were detected significantly more frequently in breast tumor tissue than in adjacent non-tumor breast tissues (p < 0.0001). The biologic consequences of the LMW isoforms were studied using a nontumorigenic mammary epithelial cell line transfected with the cyclin E isoforms and resulted in increased clonogenicity, the inability to enter quiescence in response to growth factor deprivation and genomic instability compared to the full-length cyclin E. Biochemical differences between the full-length and the LMW isoforms were also evident. Biacore analyses show that the LMW isoforms have more efficient binding to CDK2 compared to full-length cyclin E, which could account for the unique biologic consequences observed with the expression of LMW cyclin E. The LMW isoforms of cyclin E are tumor specific, and are biochemically and biologically distinct from the full-length cyclin E which could provide a novel role in breast cancer progression.
Cyclin alterations in diverse cancers: Outcome and co-amplification network
Oncotarget, 2015
Cyclin genes are key regulatory components of the cell cycle. With the development of new agents, cyclin-related genes are becoming increasingly important as they can be targeted. Yet, the biological implications of these alterations have not been fully studied. Clinical characteristics and outcome parameters were compared for patients harboring cyclin alterations versus not. CCN alterations were found in 13% of our population (50/392; all amplifications) and were associated with breast cancer (P < 0.0001), a higher median number of concomitant molecular alterations (P < 0.0001), and liver metastases (P = 0.046). Harboring a cyclin amplification was not associated with overall survival, the time to metastasis/recurrence, nor with the best progression-free survival. In a Cox regression model, gastrointestinal histology (P < 0.0001), PTEN (P < 0.0001), and CDK alterations (P = 0.041) had a significant association with poorer overall survival. CCN amplifications significant...
E- and A-type cyclins as markers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 2003
Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)2 interacting cyclins perform essential functions for DNA replication and cellular proliferation. The human genome encodes two E-type cyclins (E and E2) and two A-type cyclins (A1 and A2). Dysregulation of the CDK2-bound cyclins plays an important role in the pathogenesis of cancer. Cyclin A2 is associated with cellular proliferation and can be used for molecular diagnostics as a proliferation marker. In addition, cyclin A2 expression is associated with a poor prognosis in several types of cancer. Cyclin A1 is a tissue-specific cyclin that is highly expressed in acute myeloid leukemia and in testicular cancer. High levels of cyclin E expression are found in many types of cancer. Overexpression of cyclin E at the mRNA level can be based on gene amplification and transcriptional mechanisms. In addition, proteolytically cleaved forms of cyclin E that show oncogenic functions have been described. Cyclin E plays a critical role for G1/S transition. Its overexpression is not only associated with proliferation but rather indicates a more malignant phenotype which is likely to be linked to the induction of chromosomal instability. These biological functions of cyclin E relate to a poor prognosis when high cyclin E levels are found. The link between cyclin E and poor prognosis is well established in breast and lung cancer but is likely to be observed in other cancers as well. The second E-type cyclin, cyclin E2, has been shown to be overexpressed in breast cancers although the potential role as a diagnostic or prognostic marker is unknown. This review provides an overview of the potential of cyclins E and A as markers for diagnosis and prognosis in human cancer.
2014
Cyclin E, coded by the genes CCNE1 and CCNE2, is the main regulator for transition from G 1 to S phase determining cell division. CCNE1 and CCNE2 are known oncogenes in many cancer entities. Especially CCNE1 has frequently been associated with gene amplifications in various malignancies, emphasising its role as a putative oncogene. We determined gene expression and copy number of CCNE1 and CCNE2 by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from 172 International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) II/III/IV stage serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) tissues and analysed its impact on outcome. Furthermore, whole transcriptome gene expression changes correlating with CCNE1 expression were determined by microarray technology, interpreted by Signalling Pathway Impact Analysis (SPIA), Tool for Inferring Network of Genes (TINGe), and illustrated by hive plots. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were also used for the interpretation.
Cancer Research, 2006
Cyclin E1 regulates the initiation of the S phase program in the mammalian cell division cycle. In normal cells, cyclin E1 protein expression is tightly controlled through a combination of transcriptional and proteolytic regulatory processes. However, in many types of human tumor, cyclin E1 expression is frequently dysregulated, including overexpression, nonperiodic expression relative to cell division, and generation of low molecular weight (LMW) derivatives. LMW derivatives of cyclin E1 have been proposed to be generated by the in vivo proteolytic cleavage of the full-length cyclin E1 protein by a yet to be identified tumor-specific protease. Recently, it was suggested that overexpression of full-length or LMW derivatives of cyclin E1 are independent variables associated with poor outcome in patients with breast cancer. However, we have extensively analyzed cyclin E1 protein expression in primary breast tumors and breast tumor-derived cell lines and found that the ability to detect LMW derivatives of cyclin E1 correlates only with the level of cyclin E1 protein. When cyclin E1 levels on Western blots are normalized, LMW derivatives of cyclin E1 were observed at roughly equal levels in all primary breast tumors, breast tumor-derived cell lines, immortalized nontransformed human mammary epithelial cells, and normal breast tissue. Therefore, the detection of LMW derivatives of cyclin E1 is likely a function of cyclin E1 protein levels, and the activity of the proteolytic machinery responsible for their generation is not a tumor-specific property.
Cyclin E Overexpression in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Characterizes an Etiologic Subgroup
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2008
Background: The objective of this study was to determine whether cyclin E overexpression defines an etiologically distinct subgroup of ovarian cancer. Methods: We analyzed data from 538 epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 629 controls enrolled in a populationbased case-control study. Cyclin E protein overexpression was assessed using immunohistochemistry. Case-control and case-case comparisons were done to evaluate the relationship between cyclin E overexpression and epidemiologic risk factors. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) while adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Case-control comparisons showed ovarian cancers with and without cyclin E overexpression have different associations with several epidemiologic risk factors. A dose-response relationship was observed between lifetime ovulatory cycles (LOC) and ovarian cancer that overexpressed cyclin E [OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0 for moderately high LOC (265-390 cycles) and OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6-4.5 for high LOC (>390 cycles) compared with low LOC (<265 cycles)], but no relationship was seen with cancers that lacked overexpression. The most important components of the LOC variable contributing to the differences in the association with the cyclin E subgroups of ovarian cancer were months of oral contraceptive use and months pregnant. Conclusions: Cyclin E overexpression is associated with a high number of LOC, largely influenced by oral contraceptive use and pregnancy. This suggests that cyclin E overexpression is a molecular signature characteristic of ovarian cancer cases that may arise via a pathway that involves ovulation-induced alterations.