The origins, ideologies, and modes of warfare with the analysis and critics of different psychosocial theories answering the continuous growth in recruitment of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS (original) (raw)
Related papers
ISIS: Its History, Ideology, and Psychology
At the height of its power, ISIS was perceived as the biggest contemporary terrorist threat to world security. In this paper, we analyze the phenomenon of ISIS and its unique history through the lens of general social psychological principles that might have contributed to its stunning—even if only temporary—success. We suggest that ISIS represents a special case of a radical group born of the conjunction between psychological needs, an ideological narrative, and a networking process. We describe the details of ISIS’s evolution and operation in order to shed light on this threatening movement.
Holy Warriors: Exploring the Psychological Processes of Jihadi Radicalization
European Journal of Criminology, 2008
This paper aims to provide an overview of the psychology of individuals who join and engage in terrorism, and in particular of individuals who engage in jihadi-motivated terrorism such as that carried out by al-Qaeda and its affiliates. Based on the most reliable available evidence, this paper gives an account of the psychology and motivations of such individuals and the processes that facilitate and developviolent radicalization
The Psychology of Islamic Motivation for Terrorism
This paper studies the radical Islamic terrorist group, Hezbollah, and its religious motivations and the psychological effect of waging war via terroristic methods in the name of such a strict religious affiliation as Islam. The limited scope of this research paper allows for the review and consideration of only one Islamic terrorist organization but the information contained in this paper can be used to review and consider other Islamic terrorist groups as well. Conclusions in this paper are based on data found through psychology works on terrorism and personalities, scholarly works on Islam, as well as scholarly works specifically written on Hezbollah. This paper offers a brief synopsis of the Islamic belief and teachings, defines the religious motivations for this terrorist group and offers a brief history of the group’s inception for a better understanding of how the group acquired their ideology and established their terroristic course of action. Further research explains the religious controversies facing the group and the psychological effects of those controversies for the group. As a means of justification for the terrorist group, the scope of this paper also includes the methods of justification used by the terrorists, the psychological effects of those justifications, and the overall perceived effectiveness of the applied justifications by this group.
A SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE CONDUCT OF AL-QAEDA TERRORISM
TESAM AKADEMİ, 2016
This article is primarily concerned with social psychological explanation of the conduct of al-Qaeda terrorism. Al-Qaeda is a network of cells dispersed worldwide and in cooperation with local militant Islamist groups. Since it has characteristics and dynamics of its own that are distinct from traditional actors in international politics, an attempt to understand al-Qaeda as an actor and conduct of its terrorist behavior requires looking well beyond the traditional approaches in international relations scholarship as well as group level analysis, interdisciplinary research and focus on context and process. In this sense, social psychology accounts appear to have explanatory power to understand the al-Qaeda network and conduct of its activities. The article takes the idea of collectivity and moral disengagement from coercive action as two main social psychological dynamics of the terrorist conduct and primarily argues that al-Qaeda affiliated groups morally disengage from detrimental conduct through Bandura's disengagement mechanisms and within a collective context. Keywords: International terrorism, terrorist behavior, al-Qaeda, social psychology, mechanisms of moral disengagement, idea of collectivity
Psychological Insights into Homegrown Jihadists
The Journal of Campus Behavioral Intervention, 2019
This article examines eight homegrown jihadists in light of my psychological typology of school shooters. The terrorists are discussed within the three categories of the typology: psychopathic, psychotic, and traumatized. Though terrorists have often been viewed as ordinary often been recognized.
Journal of Strategic Security, 2020
Two hundred and twenty Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) defectors, returnees, and imprisoned ISIS cadres were in-depth interviewed by the author, a research psychologist working for the International Center for the Study of Violent Extremism (ICSVE) from 2015-2019. These interviews were conducted in Turkey, Iraq, Syria, the Balkans, Europe, and Central Asia with ISIS prisoners, returnees, and defectors. The purpose was to learn about their recruitment history, motivations for joining, travel, experiences inside the group, disillusionment over time, and defection, return or capture. This article reports on a sample of both male and female former ISIS members representing over 35 countries. It examines their demographics, contextual, and other qualitative variants regarding their psycho-social vulnerabilities and motivations for joining. It then discusses the influences and recruitment patterns drawing them into the group, their roles, experiences, and relationships inside it, v...
The psychology of extremism and terrorism: A Middle-Eastern perspective
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2007
The recent surge of terrorism and issues related to its causes are reviewed in this paper from a Middle-Eastern perspective. First, important related issues such as the definition, ideologies, environment, political, and social reasons that are linked to terrorism are briefly reviewed. Second, and the main focus in this paper, is a review of the psychological variables associated with terrorism. Finally suggestions for possible solutions and research projects are offered.
Understanding Youth Radicalization in the Age of ISIS: A Psychosocial Analysis
2021
In December 2015, Malaysian police reported that the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) had set up camps in Kazakhstan and Syria to train and indoctrinate children as young as two years old to become militants. It was alleged that the camps were training children from all over the world in the use of firearms, as well as immersing them in what one senior Malaysian police officer called a ‘false jihad’.
This report analyzes and synthesizes what has been reported from the scientific and professional literature about the psychology of terrorism. By attempting to identify, describe, and evaluate what contribution psychological theory or research may have made to understanding terrorists and terrorism. One of the gravest threats to the national security environment is without question, terrorism. In order to better understand the causes, motivations, and determinants of terrorist behavior, this report identifies and analyzes the scientific and professional social science literature pertaining to the psychological and/or behavioral dimensions of terrorist behavior. The objective is to explore what questions pertaining to terrorist groups and behavior had been asked by social science researchers, to identify the main findings from that research, and attempt to distill and summarize them within a framework of operationally relevant questions. Highlights of key findings on the psychology of terrorism include: (1) people become terrorists in different ways, in different roles, and for different reasons; (2) mental illness is not a critical factor in explaining terrorist behaviors and most terrorists are not psychopaths; (3) histories of childhood abuse and trauma and themes of perceived injustice and humiliation often are prominent in terrorist biographies, but do not help to explain terrorism; (4) not all extremist ideologies promote violence, nor are all extremists violent; (5) terrorist groups have certain internal and external vulnerabilities to their existence; (6) little research has been conducted on terrorist recruitment; (7) effective leaders of terrorist organizations must be able to maintain a collective belief system, establish and maintain organizational routines, control the flow of communication, deflect conflict to external targets, manipulate incentives for followers, and keep action going; and (8) research on the psychology of terrorism largely lacks substance and rigor. References