The Revolution and Social Transformation : new approaches to the « end of revolutions » in nineteenth century France (original) (raw)
Related papers
States and Societies in Revolution: Two Steps Forward, Perhaps One Step Back?
Theory and Society, 1994
Jeff Goodwin's analysis of revolutions and of writings about them combines, as always, a close and perceptive reading with acute commentary that generally hits the mark. Both the content and tenor of his comments, particularly on my Guerrillas and Revolution in Latin America, ~ promise to do more than "kindle cole" -i.e., kindle coal by creating more heat than light in textual battles for scholarly status 2 -and the light he creates should move us all forward.
Revolutions, empires, and nations: A political history of the 19 th century Europe
The aim of this first-year class is to help students think about the processes of political and social transformation in nineteenth century Europe, from the end of the Napoleonic Wars to the 'Age of the Masses', which began at the dawn of the twentieth-century. Our analysis focuses on the joint evolutions of regimes and political organisations (the persistence and reform of multinational empires, nation state building, and the rise of new colonial empires), cultural and political sensitivities (liberalism, conservatism, democracy, socialism), and practices of mobilisation (revolts and insurrections, formal and informal politicisation, war commitments, religious or associative engagements, etc.). Political history is understood in a broad sense, in light of the economic, social, and cultural changes that have affected, at different scales, nineteenth century societies. Europe is not considered in a homogeneous way; we are interested in the tensions and conflicts which have divided it, the imagination of its borders and its limits. Nor will it be considered in an isolated or self-centred way; European expansion will be placed in the context of the 'globalisation' of the nineteenth century and Europe's interactions with the Americas, Africa and Asia. While remaining focused on a well-defined issue, the class will integrate recent contributions of research in transnational history, imperial history, and global history, among other areas, and engage students with primary sources from which narrative and historical analyses are built.
This paper is part of a broader theoretical project for a rereading of some of the crucial theoretical debates of the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, especially those related to the theoretical and philosophical interventions of Louis Althusser. Some of the positions sketched here have been initially presented as part of a seminar we coordinated last spring in Athens. We have also discussed as part of preparation the new edition of some of Louis Althusser's major works in Greek.
State, Political Power and Revolution: Althusser, Poulantzas, Balibar and the “Debate on the State”
This paper is part of a broader theoretical project for a rereading of some of the crucial theoretical debates of the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, especially those related to the theoretical and philosophical interventions of Louis Althusser. Some of the positions sketched here have been initially presented as part of a seminar we coordinated last spring in Athens. We have also discussed as part of preparation the new edition of some of Louis Althusser's major works in Greek.
Contemporary and GramsCian CritiCal soCio-HistoriCal Views on state and reVolutions
This paper intends to feed a methodological, theoretical and philosophical reflexion on the critical perspectives historical and political sociology can imply or afford as regards the formation of the modern State and its developments. Indeed, whether they are classical or contemporary, many political sociologists or socio-historians have bequeathed or proposed socio-historical intuitions, (self-) critical reflexions or innovative tools enabling us to better understand the relations between the State and (civil) society as well as the power relations that could lead to stability or instability of political regimes over time; and to enrich contemporary debates on the meanings of the State, democracy and related concepts. These authors of the past and the present have often been questioning and critical, enabling us to relativise the Eurocentric and deterministic character historical sociology is sometimes «accused» of, whereof its authors were or are more or less conscious.