US FOREIGN POLICY TOWARDS NORTH KOREA DURING Donald Trump updated 1 2 (original) (raw)
Related papers
An Analysis of USA and North Korea Relations from 1945 till Date
IJRISS
The paper examines the USA and North Korea Relations from 1945 till date. It discusses the Korean peninsula under the control of Japan and China. It analyzes San Francisco Treaty and USA intervention. The relationship between USA and North Korea in the 20 th and 21 st Centuries came to focus. The study relied on primary sources like oral interview and secondary sources such as books, newspapers, journal articles, speeches, theses, dissertations. It was found that her geographical position placed her in a precarious situation hence Japan, China and Russia exploited before USA intervention. It was also found that the involvement of USA in Korean civil war against North Korea strained the relationship between the two countries. It was found that over 3 millions North Koreans died in that war because of USA involvement. Again, the dismissal of General Douglas by Harry Truman, who was planning to use nuclear weapons on North Korea came to focus. In conclusion, the constant test of rockets by North Korea in Korean peninsula and USA imposition of sanctions on her, demanding full denuclearization before the lifting of sanctions strained the relationship between the two countries.
TRUMP'S ADMINISTRATION AND PERSISTENT MISSILE TEST OF NORTH KOREA: IMPACT ON WORLD POLITICS
2020
The paper examines the nexus between the United States and Korean Missiles test which has continued to threaten peace in the North and East-Asian regions. Using the qualitative research as supported by conflict theory, findings show that, the Trump administration wanted to use China to remote-control North Korea, but he later discovered that he was wrong. The paper concludes that since Trump has criticised Obama for doing so over Syrian chemical weapons and then failing to carry out such red-line threat, President Trump may feel he can hardly afford the opprobrium that would follow should he fail to respond in this case. Although all attentions now are on fighting the COVID-19 pandemic and Trump showed that he is not likely to go to war with the limited strike that killed the Iranian military commander Sulaymani. The paper recommends the United States should continue to follow diplomatic path and engaging the international community as in the six party talks, to resolve the Korean Nuclear issue; the U.S. should desist in conducting such joint military drills with Japan and South Korea which continues to threaten the North and; the United Nations should not support the U.S. in imposing sanctions on North Korea, but find a better way of denuclearization.
US – N. Korea peace talks: strategic or tactical diplomacy? Outlining the history and factors that have influenced US – North Korea diplomatic relations/ Msiska Abel / Zambia , 2018
The evening of March 28th 2018, amazed the whole world when it was headlined that Trump agrees to have peace talks with the Kim. This state of event not only baffled keen political events followers, but proved err in most public-politic-analysis and predictions previously been made over the US- N. Korea relations, reason being the announcement came at a time when war prospects where at height while others even anticipated the third world war as being very eminent. Attempting to understand this complex relationship between the North Korea and the US can only be made possible if one understood the role of Russia - US relationship especially during the cold war. The influence of Russia in global politics resulted into satellite communist states with their own local ideological frameworks and given the Asian states possessed fragments Maoism and Stalinism. The Korea Republic was divided into two ideological fronts of which the North was occupied by Soviet Union while the south came under US occupation. The members of the ruling Kim dynasty – past and present – enjoy near god-like status in North Korea, which has demonstrated extreme sensitivity to any remark that might be seen as mocking or disrespectful of the leadership. In November 2017, the US elected a new President Donald Trump as America’s 45th president. Negotiating and coming to terms with North Korea is very problematic in light of its long history of the country systematically violating agreements. proponents of this summit and the relationship have generally come to conclude and defend the legitimacy of this meeting and peace talks that where held between the two signatory parties. The idea is if the move is strategic, north Korea and US will enter into long term relationship that will see the two countries protect this agreement no matter what. On the other hand, if this agreement is tactical it possible that there is one country among the two that is merely trying to find a loophole to bring the other government down or frustrate its operations. Points have been leveled forward to deduce that N. Korea is acting out of fear while other proponents have simply argued that these concessions are out of mutual interest in establishing and promoting international peace and security and healthy nuclear programmes. However, from the author’s point of view, the answer to this is still very uncertain as the turnout of events will yet determine whether the new diplomatic relations are tactical or strategic.
U.S. Foreign Policy Towards North Korea
International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal, 2018
The U.S. relations to Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) are since the end of the Cold War revolving around achieving a state of nuclear free Korean peninsula. As non-proliferation is a long term of American foreign policy, relations to North Korea could be categorized primarily under this umbrella. However, the issue of North Korean political system also plays role as it belongs to the other important, more normative category of U.S. foreign policy which is the protection of human rights and spreading of democracy and liberal values. In addition, the North Korean issue influences U.S. relations and interests in broader region of Northeast Asia, its bilateral alliances with South Korea (Republic of Korea, ROK) and Japan as well as sensitive and complex relations to People’s Republic of China. As the current administration of president Donald J. Trump published its National security strategy and was fully occupied with the situation on Korean peninsula in its first year, th...
North Korea's Nuclear Threat to United States Security During the Leadership of Donald Trump
Journal of Social and Economics Research
This paper attempts to look at the North Korean nuclear threat to the security of the United States during the presidency of the United States President Donald Trump by using the Security Dilemma, which is one of the concepts in realism theory that arises as a result of a country's actions to improve its country's security. Still, on the one hand, it creates a reaction. Other countries also want to improve their security, which will lead to a decrease in safety in the first country. In addition, the author also uses Balance of Power which underlies his view that every government or alliance of countries that feel threatened by increasing the military power of a country or a coalition of other countries will respond by increasing the strength of their country as a balancing effort. North Korea is again in the global spotlight for developing its nuclear program. This has created a reaction in the form of a security threat to the United States, so under the leadership of Donald...
North Korean Nuclear Proliferation as an Aspect of U.S.-China Relations
This paper investigates the need for international cooperation in the form of multilateral negotiations and coordination of sanctions in the resolution of the ongoing crisis over North Korean nuclear proliferation. I have examined this issue primarily by questioning how it plays into relations between the United States and China. As a rising superpower, formerly in the economic sense but more recently in a military sense as well, China is a major actor in East Asian security affairs. Consequently, a great deal of my focus has been on the nature of Chinese regional influence, degree of and basis for regional hegemony, and how that fits into the posture of the United States in Asia. My research and analysis began on the basis of newspaper articles, especially in the New York Times, which have reported on the issue of North Korean nuclear proliferation, provocations and aggressive posture, and U.S. as well as Chinese responses. This was followed by studying various books on the topic of U.S.-China relations, particularly with a focus on those addressing how that relationship should be handled in coming years. This study came to include scholarly articles and policy papers which examine and articulate the rhetoric on this issue from a variety of perspectives rather than simply from the American policymaking side of things. Primary sources such as news articles informed my analysis of the most recent developments but the theory of this paper has also been grounded in a variety of secondary sources produced by high-ranking IR practitioners, influential analysts, and professors in the field of international relations and strategic studies. My findings are primarily based on a liberal institutionalist foundation but I have also taken into account valid analysis from other perspectives, including realist views and other views which fall between the two extremes of realism and liberalism. While acknowledging the propensity for a situation such as the one examined here to result in warfare due to geopolitical realities, and acknowledging the role that geopolitics play in the important relationships discussed here, I have strived to find a positive, optimistic suggestion for avoiding warfare while stressing the urgency of finding a peaceful solution lest said warfare result. I have found that the situation in North Korea necessitates a high level of cooperation between the United States and China, as well as other regional powers such as South Korea and Japan. Due to the high stakes and brinkmanship behavior so apparent in this situation, I frequently refer to it as a crisis because if it isn’t handled quickly and effectively, much damage will be done on a global level. Chinese influence and leverage over North Korea will be particularly important for developing a framework for denuclearization and resolution of this dangerous crisis over North Korea’s nuclear program. While previous attempts at negotiation such as the Six Party Talks produced an agreed framework only to fail implementation, an increasingly firm Chinese stance and Korean vulnerability to Chinese influence lays the groundwork for successful future negotiations. The current administration under President Trump has thus far taken a stronger stance towards North Korea, contrasting with the Obama administration’s strategic patience. However, the United States must tread the line carefully between a firm stance and brinkmanship which could result in widespread nuclear war. American policymakers must capitalize on the opportunity provided by Chinese ascendancy while learning to work with China in productive, peaceful ways for the sake of long-term peace and prosperity. If that can be achieved, then finding a peaceful solution to North Korea as well as other issues such as the South China Sea is much more feasible.
Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Political Science, 2020
since the inception of the Trump administration. The article makes a direct comparison between the D. Trump administration and its immediate predecessor, the B. Obama Administration. We look at how U.S Foreign policy towards these two Asian countries is, under Trump, framed by a reliance on personalism and power politics on part of the current U.S administration. The paper makes an assessment of how practical issues with both China (trade, geopolitics in Asia-Pacific), and North Korea (nuclear weapons, sanctions, human rights) have evolved over the last three years, presenting hypothesis for future scenarios in either the case of a Trump re-election, or a change of leadership in the White House.
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 2021
This paper analyses foreign policy research with theories of international relations study such as realism and liberalism. Then work continues applying theories of realism and liberalism with case study. As a case study have been chosen bilateral relations of South Korea with Uzbekistan and there is chosen Complex interdependence theory for that. In that case, complex interdependence more suitable to define cooperation of two countries such as Uzbekistan and South Korea. One of the arguments is that relations of South Korea and Uzbekistan by three conditions which are absence of force, lack of hierarchy and contact of multiple channels. From these criteria we can see that there is no role of power or force between two countries relations, the most accent has made in different kind of cooperation between them which is appropriate with multiple channels are playing significant role in this condition.
Overcoming US-North Korean Enmity: Lessons from an Eclectic IR Approach
The International Spectator, 2019
Periods of mutual enmity in US-North Korean relations are typically interrupted by more conciliatory gestures. How can the many twists and turns in this relationship be explained and hopefully overcome so that more long-lasting détente is accomplished? Drawing eclectically on realism and constructivism, we conclude that a nuclear deal should address not only North Korea’s interests in security and regime survival, but also its status concerns. Applying the same theories to the other part of the dyad – the US – we conclude that it may now have material interests in ameliorating the relationship, but that such a development requires US foreign policy discourse to cease depicting North Korea as “irrational” and “evil”.