Environmental Justice in the UK: Uncertainty, Ambiguity and the Law (original) (raw)
Related papers
Justice approaches: methods and methodology in environmental justice research
2017
Environmental management involves making decisions about the governance of natural resources such as water, minerals or land, which are inherently decisions about what is just or fair. Yet, there is little emphasis on justice in environmental management research or practical guidance on how to achieve fairness and equity in environmental governance and public policy. This results in social dilemmas that are significant issues for government, business and community agendas, causing conflict between different community interests.Natural Resources and Environmental Justice provides the first comprehensive, interdisciplinary examination of justice research in Australian environmental management, identifying best practice and current knowledge gaps. With chapters written by experts in environmental and social sciences, law and economics, this book covers topical issues, including coal seam gas, desalination plants, community relations in mining, forestry negotiations, sea-level rise and ...
Analyzing Evidence of Environmental Justice
1995
ANALYZING EVIDENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE VICKI BEEN * I. INTRODUCTION A new and powerful movement has swept through environmental and land use law, challenging many of its basic tenets and forcing it to confront the difficult issues of who gets what kind of environmental quality, where environmentally undesirable land uses get put, and why. 1 The movement, known as environmental justice, focuses on the distributional implications of the way in which our society seeks to manage environmental threats and improve and protect environmental quality. 2 _____________________________________________________________ *
Forum for Social Economics, 2003
This article examines the implications of pluralism/'or environmental decision-making and governance in the globalizing world. It first discusses how environmental governance is needed to deal with environmental cm~icts and interdependencies caused by the attributes of environmental resources and their users. The article argues that globalization engenders large-scale interdependenties and conflicts that involve increasingly heterogeneous individuals and organizations. The article suggests that the resulting radical pluralism will underline the role of justice in providing reasons and justifications for collective environmental decisions and will shift emphasis from distributive justice to procedural justice. The article concludes by discussing solutions that would take justice concerns into account in environmental governance.
Towards Social Environmental Justice?
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012
This Working Paper is the result of a workshop held at the European University Institute in November 2010. At the heart of it lies a reflection on the potentialities of a new legal concept: social environmental justice. Building on the longstanding tradition of social justice and the more recent trend of environmental (or ecological) justice, our aim was to discuss how these two different dimensions of 'justice' overlap and could be reconciled in an all-encompassing notion. Moreover, we discussed the need for such a new concept in the light of the contemporary challenges of climate change and economic globalisation and focused especially on the concept's added value compared to the already existing notion of sustainable development. In addition to that, we explored the practical value of social environmental justice especially in the context of legal practice. This publication is a mirror of the different normative approaches (more social, more environmental, more holistic) one can adopt in dealing with problems such as climate change and globalization. Finally, it suggests different legal paths (Human rights, Private International Law, European Law) that could be taken in order to address these issues.
Retooling Environmental Justice
UCLA Journal of Environmental law and Policy, 2021
Author(s): Salcido, Rachel | Abstract: This Article responds to environmental justice arguments that undermine, rather than safeguard, health and environmental quality for low-income and minority populations. nEfforts by scholars and practitioners to clearly define “environmental injustice” to facilitate use of racial discrimination legal frameworks have had minimal success and are ultimately limiting the ability to embrace a broader arsenal of weapons in the fight against injustice. nThe greatest weapon of the environmental justice movement is its people. nEnvironmental justice must evolve more rapidly beyond efforts to merely give communities voice, and actually redistribute power and decision making to open up opportunities for social movement intersection. nThe struggle to define environmental justice is difficult because it attempts to crystalize the efforts of converging social movements that continue. nThis Article advocates more explicit acceptance of environmental justice a...
When does unequal become unfair? Judging claims of environmental injustice
Environment and Planning A, 2014
The purpose of this paper is twofold. Firstly, it presents a pluralistic framework for justice that combines an expanded interpretation of distributive justice with concerns for recognition, participation, capability, and responsibility. It argues that the latter has not attracted the scholarly attention that it deserves in the environmental justice debate. Secondly, the paper demonstrates how this multidimensional framework can be applied in practice to inform practical judgments about particular environmental justice claims by using an example of traffic-related air pollution in the city of Newcastle upon Tyne in the United Kingdom.