In Limbo: Russia's Policy in the Nagorniy Karabakh Conflict (original) (raw)
Related papers
Russia’s Main Strategy for the Nagorno-Karabakh Issue
After the deterioration of relations between Russia and the West, and some disruption to Russia’s efforts to influence Ukraine’s European and NATO political course, the Kremlin activated its policy in the Caucasus and Caspian Sea region. The main goal of Putin’s policy is to preclude the political influence and activity of Western powers in unsettled conflicts like Nagorno-Karabakh between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The Kremlin’s purpose is to marginalize and to distance itself from the OSCE Minsk Group initiatives.
Russia’s Role in the Karabakh Conflict
Orhan Gafarli, 2022
This book presents a comprehensive overview of the Nagorno-Karabakh confict, the long-running dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the Armenian-majority region of Azerbaijan. It outlines the historical development of the dispute, explores the political and social aspects of the confict, examines the wars over the territory including the war of 2020 which resulted in a signifcant Azerbaijani victory, and discusses the international dimensions.
Analyzing Russia’s Interests in the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh Ceasefire Agreemen
Jurnal Hubungan Internasional
The Nagorno-Karabakh war has been one of the most important conflicts in the South Caucasus. The two nations involved, Azerbaijan and Armenia, have been in conflict more times than in cooperation ever since their independence from the Soviet Union. The territory disputed, Nagorno-Karabakh, has been internationally recognized as Azerbaijan’s since the United Nations General Assembly Resolution in 2008. However, this did not stop the conflict, as seen with the newest escalation happening in September of 2020. In the majority of the conflict, Russia has been a constant presence, being a mediator as well as a military supplier to both countries. Russia also has been involved in peacekeeping efforts, sending peacekeeping forces to Nagorno-Karabakh. In November 2020, a ceasefire agreement was reached involving Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Russia. This paper aims to examine Russia’s interest in its involvement in the conflict, the weaknesses of the ceasefire agreement, and Russia’s gains from ...
Russia as an Obstacle in the Settlement of Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict
From Tsarist period to the present day Russia try to keep under its control both internal and foreign policy of Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia with the implementation of active agenda in the South Caucasus region. After the Soviet Union collapsed, in order to manage the former post-soviet area (excluding Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia) Russia was trying to get back the region’s agenda to his administration via creating a new geopolitical means.
OSTWEST Monitoring, 2023
RUSSIA USED THE KARABAKH CONFLICT AS A BARGAINING CHIP TO ADVANCE ITS GEOPOLITICAL INTERESTS. Published in English, Armenian, Russian and German. In the aftermath of the military offensive and ethnic cleansing of Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2023, Azerbaijan seized control of the capital Stepanakert and demolished the de facto state that had existed for the last three decades. The status quo policy of Armenia and its reliance on Russia for security did not save Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia from the 2020 war and its consequences. Russia missed the opportunity to save its face, once more choosing further advancement of its geopolitical interests instead of the protection of the rights and security of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians. Russia also lost the trust of its ally Armenia, which is apparently leading to transformation in its foreign and security policies.
War in Nagorno-Karabakh Requires a Russian Balancing Act
The Central Asia - Caucasus Analyst , 2020
Both countries have criticized Moscow’s position on the current war. Russia has been a security guarantor for Armenia since the 1990s and has more recently become a strategic partner of Azerbaijan. Moscow’s position has raised the question of whether Russia struggles to balance its relations with a strategic ally and a strategic partner, or if the Kremlin’s reluctance to become involved signals a change in policy regarding the former Soviet republics.
Russia’s Policy during the 44-day of the Karabakh War
Insight Turkey, 2021
The 44-day Karabakh War seriously affected the international balances in the Caucasus in terms of security, politics, and economic dimensions. The attitude of international actors during the war was important to define the fate and consequences of the war. Among these international actors, Russia’s attitude was of special importance. The policy followed by Russia during and after the 44-day Karabakh War had four main and parallel pillars: The first pillar of Russia's policy was maintaining the status of its traditional ally Armenia. The second pillar was maintaining its mediator role for the resolution of the conflict. The third pillar of the policy pursued by the Kremlin was not harming the strategic partnership relationship with Azerbaijan, which had been specially developed during Vladimir Putin’s tenure. The fourth pillar of the policies pursued by Russia was not disrupting the multidimensional profound relationships with Turkey, which had advanced in recent years. The first...