Rewriting and Interpreting Scripture in the Dead Sea Scrolls (original) (raw)
It is clear that the Dead Sea Scrolls had a particular approach to their understanding of Scripture, which they used to interpret Scripture to their community. Firstly, they rewrote the biblical texts in order to make clear and emphasize the themes in Bible which were of concern to their community. Secondly, they interpreted the Bible in such a way to apply biblical prophecy to their present situation. The Teacher of Righteousness features prominently in their understanding of Scripture having multiple layers of meaning which need to be revealed by an inspired interpreter. Because of their historical circumstances the tendency was towards interpreting Scripture eschatologically, referring to their contemporary situation. While their exegetical method was not unique or novel to themselves, clearly having roots in Babylonian-inspired texts such as Daniel and Enoch, they offer the clearest and most extensive example of this type of exegesis being applied in a pre-midrashic period. From this evidence it is clear that the later forms of exegesis, such as that present in the New Testament, midrash, and Talmud are outgrowths of, and variations upon, the exegesis techniques found in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Clearly, evolution took place in the understanding of how to best interpret Scripture, especially in the posteschatological and post-messianic situation both Judaism and Christianity found itself in after the destruction of the Second Temple. However, by becoming aware of the evolutionary process one can become more aware of how later Jewish and Christian exegesis was intended to work.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Doctrines of the Dead Sea Scrolls: The Doctrine of the Bible
Over 200 Dead Sea Scrolls and fragments have been identified as biblical scrolls out of the total of 900 scrolls and fragments. Genesis was a popular book in the Qumran community as 20 Genesis manuscripts have been discovered. The complete Isaiah scroll (1QIsa) is the best known of the DSS discovered in 1947. The Yahad thought that they were fulfilling Isaiah's prophecy by separating from the Jews in Jerusalem and going out to the wilderness to prepare the way of the Lord through the study of Torah. The four gospels on the other hand present the fulfillment of Isaiah's prophecy in the person of John the Baptist, the forerunner of Messiah Jesus. The Genesis Apocryphon (1Q20) found in cave one is an example of rewritten scriptures. It adds apocryphal stories such as the story of Lamech who questions his wife about her pregnancy. The Genesis Apocryphon adds a dream of Abram and also an extra-biblical description of the beauty of Sarai, Abram's wife. The Dead Sea Scrolls also contained biblical commentaries (pesharim) which reveal how the Essenes interepreted the Old Testament and related it to their particular time. The Habakkuk Pesher shows that the Essenes (Yahad) followed the Teacher of Righteousness and interpreted Habakkuk's prophecy about the coming Chaldeans (Babylonians) to be a reference to the invasion of the Kittiim (the Romans). The Wicked Priest was a non-Zadokite high priest who was rejected by the Qumran community. The exegesis of Habakkuk 2:15-17 done by the Jews at Qumran is compared to a literal historical interpretation of the same text to show the differences.
Before the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Hebrew text of the Bible was known mainly from the medieval manuscripts of MT and the Samaritan Pentateuch(SP). Other sources are the medieval copies of the LXX, Peshitta, Targumim, and Vulgate. An inductive approach to the scrolls should start with the data that were available before the scrolls were found in 1947. If we were to start the analysis immediately with a description of the scrolls themselves, we would not be able to sense the impact of the immense revolution created by the new finds. Further, the human mind works from the known to the unknown by linking new data to data already known. We have to first analyze in detail MT, SP, and the LXX, since otherwise we cannot point out the closeness between a scroll and, for example, the LXX. We have no alternative but to proceed in this way, not only because the LXX 1) You can see Sample files at www.
Since the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in the 1940's and 1950's there has been an overwhelming growth in biblical studies, leading to the development of what is now familiar to to scholars as the subfield of early biblical interpretation. Interest in interpretation and ongoing production of texts that are called interpretative has generated much scholarship. Entire research areas have grown up around hermeneutics, genres of biblical interpretation, e.g., rewritten bible, intertextuality, inner-biblical interpretation, and attention to early Jewish commentary. Additionally, a great deal of energy and scholarship has been devoted to intertextuality and the role of hermeneutics in compositional practices. This was inspired especially by texts such as the Genesis Apocryphon, Jubilees (now in Hebrew fragments, Targum to Job and many new liturgical compositions such as the Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice and wisdom compositions such as Instruction. The scholarship of early biblical interpretation gravitates to the ways in which Jewish literature from the Second Temple period rewrites earlier biblical traditions (for example Alexander 1988; Crawford 2008). Moreover, a great deal of scholarly attention has been given to the construction and destruction of scholarly categories for Second Temple texts, and to understanding how these interpretative texts fit into categories or genres that are already familiar to the scholarly discourse. Beyond generic categories, in recent years, scholarship has also turned to trying to understand how reading practices are reflected in these expansive and interpretative texts. On the one hand scholarship has looked forward to later forms of biblical interpretation in
The Dead Sea Scrolls, Pseudepigrapha, and Expansions of Scripture
Divine Guidance, 2020
The sources presented here reflect voices from various creative strands of Jewish community life between 700 BCE and 135 CE. All of them in varying ways approach divine guidance through communal rereading, reinterpretation, and expansion of scripture. The Qumran community (which produced the Dead Sea Scrolls) took a hierarchical view of guidance, placing discernment largely in the hands of the elders. Pseudepigrapha and expansions of scripture, like the Prayer of Manasseh, used the name of a biblical figure to expand on what the biblical text itself may have mentioned only in passing. Jubilees elaborates on Abram’s crucial but brief encounter with God in Genesis 12 and depicts it as a response to Abram’s request for divine guidance. The Sibylline Oracles (as distinct from the Roman Sibylline Books) attribute Jewish oracles to the pagan Sibyl. 3 Maccabees weaves together human initiative with divine guidance to the Jewish community in Alexandria.
Elec10.Understanding the Text of the Bible 65 Years after the Discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls
The focus of this study is the biblical Dead Sea Scrolls, 65 years after their discovery near the Dead Sea, with the purpose of improving our understanding of the text of Hebrew Scripture. The Qumran finds (more than 200 fragmentary scrolls) reflect textual plurality, and all the biblical texts were probably considered authoritative. At the same time, the 25 Scripture scrolls from sites in the Judean Desert outside Qumran are virtually identical to the medieval MT.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.