HOMEless: A Case Study of Private/Public Inversion and the Temporal- Spatial Exclusion Faced by Migrant Domestic Workers (original) (raw)
Translation of 吳永毅，〈無 HOME可歸：公私反轉與外籍家勞所受之時空排斥的個案研究〉， 《台灣社會研究季刊》66 (2007)：頁1-74
This paper is a case study of the shutdown of HOME (the House for Migrant Workers' Empowerment), a cultural and service center for migrant workers. HOME was founded by the Taipei City Labor Bureau (TCLB) and subcontracted to TIWA (the Taiwan International Workers' Association) in 2002, when the Director of the TCLB was the former labor activist Zheng Cun-qi. For migrant domestic workers, the distinction between sold-time and free-time (i.e. the work-rest distinction) is blurred. Most of their supposedly private reproductive activities are temporally squeezed into holidays and spatially forced into public places where they are exposed to the scrutiny of the Taiwanese. This peculiar situation of private/public inversion not only results from, but also serves to reinforce, racial discrimination and class inferiority in their workplace (i.e. the homes of their employers). I use the concept of 'bracketing' to describe the spatial-temporal strategies used by migrant domestic workers against this distorted inversion. I also analyze how employers 'counterbracket' migrant worker subjects as a counter strategy. HOME once existed as a 'surrogate home', providing shelter for migrant workers and allowing them to retain privacy during their days off. TIWA conducted organizing-oriented cultural and political activities to assist the migrants in forming their own community, and challenged the spatial hegemony of real estate owners in the ChungShan District. However, when Yan Shang-luan, a well-known feminist labor research professor, took over the directorship of the TCLB in 2004, she did not appreciate the function of HOME, and decided to close its doors. In analyzing the official rhetoric in the documents of the TCLB, I find that their decision to shut down HOME was a result of their middle-class temporal-spatial 'habitus'. The shutdown became a counter-bracket measure, which coincided with the real estate interests of the ChungShan local elites.
Related papers
"Snail Households": Containerization of Migrant Housing on Shanghai's Fringe
positions: asia critique, 2022
China's escalated infrastructural building and real estate development have gradually erased urban villages and reduced affordable living space for rural-to-urban migrants. This article showcases the emerging practice of container housing among low-income migrants, based on ethnographic data collected between 2016 and 2018 in Shanghai. Such “snail households” living in removable cargo containers and prefabricated metal shelters represent a submissive coping mechanism in response to demolition and eviction, to reduce living cost and stay put on the urban fringe. This article examines the containerization of migrant housing, a process of sociospatial reconfiguration of migrant livelihood that has become increasingly precarious during China's economic restructuring in the twenty-first century. It shows how container housing reifies the state capitalist mode of production and accumulation. The containerization of migrant housing entails a multifaceted process of extraction of labor and land, during which migrants’ mobility and sense of entitlement are highly contained. Container housing represents migrants’ sociospatial precarity in China's exclusive urban citizenship and place-specific property regime. It symbolizes a reinforced subaltern position of migrants subdued in the politics of accumulation, which contributes to the lack of strong resistance and collective action amid forced eviction.
Gender and the Housing “Questions” in Taiwan
This paper argues that the housing system is not only capitalist but also patriarchal by analyzing how the interrelations of the state, housing market, and the family reproduce gender divisions. In contrast to the housing condition of the working class in pre-welfare state Europe, as originally described by Friedrich Engels, Taiwan’s housing system was constructed by an authoritarian developmental state that repressed labor movements and emphasized economic development over social welfare. However, since the late 1980s, pro-market housing policies have greatly enhanced the commodification of housing, resulting in a unique combination of high homeownership rates, high vacancy rates, and high housing prices. This paper examines the formation of housing questions in Taiwan and its impact on women. In doing so it reveals how a social housing movement emerged in the context of a recent housing boom – on that that has occurred despite a global economic downturn – and which could provide an opportunity for feminist intervention within the housing system to transform gender relations. 這一期的國際批判地理學期刊，專門主題為”重審恩格斯的住宅問題”，有Neil Smith的文章，還有我的文章，”台灣的性別和住宅問題”。文章有幾個重點: 一、 女性主義應該介入重建都市的議題，目前的住宅危機，給予婦女可以參與和改變都市的機會。 二、 都市不僅是資本主義的產物，也是父權社會的產物。住宅問題的解決方式，必須調整生產和再生產領域，協調工作和家務之間的分別，降低個別家庭的負擔。 三、 台灣的住宅問題發展，一直很難有用資本主義和階級的分析角度，這和殖民歷史和戰後反共、白色恐怖，還有特殊的工人意識發展有關。 四、 台灣沒有住宅短缺的問題，而是，住宅變成投機的工具。 五、 台灣的住宅問題，處於未知的狀態。因為，政府的統計並不是在於挖掘問題和面對問題。目前比較多的數字，是關於住宅市場的調查，而不是在了解住宅問題所在。所以，整個台灣的住宅問題是什麼，其實是處於無知的狀態。 文章可以直接下載，敬請指教。
Housing and Single Mothers in the KMT Regime of Taiwan, 1949-2000
Worlds have made the female-headed family a visible category in urban policies. The history of feminist spatial research marks a shift from the analyses of gender roles to gender relations. This research uses both approaches to analyze single mother's housing conditions in Taipe 1 . First, it builds a gender category, and second, interprets gender inequality from the interaction between the productive and reproductive, public and private domains. It links housing with family, labor market structures, legal systems, and state policies to explore how their interactions produce and reproduce gender relations in Taiwan. In contrast to North American or English women's experiences, the status of Taiwanese women is dominated by a patrilineal family structure. The patrilineal principle in the public and private domains leads to Taiwanese women's inferior status in property rights, autonomy, family supports, economic status, and welfare. The housing policy of Taiwan, however, remained gender blind up until the 1990s. This paper will reveal the housing conditions of single-mother families and explain their inferior housing conditions. Housing policies under the KMT regime from 1949 to 2000 distributed most of the resources to affluent home-buyers and the state's supporters, primarily military personnel, government employees and developers. The social inequality in these policies not only increased the gap between rich and poor but also between men and women.
CHINESE URBANISM: Critical Perspectives, 2018
Beijing’s hutong neighborhoods have undergone drastic urban landscape and demographic changes over the past decade. The processes of commodification and modernization have prompted dramatic dislocations of everyday practice in the public, private and hybrid (interstitial) spaces within these neighborhoods. My research looks at the ways in which socialization and care practices (i.e. child care or elder care) are being squeezed out of these more communal-oriented interstitial spaces during Beijing’s most recent socio-spatial restructuring. As such, the marginalized poor bear a greater burden as they try to adjust to the disappearance of these communal spaces of caring and community. This case study is based on informal interviews and participant observation to investigate, differentiate, and highlight the implications of everyday practices resulting from the spatial consolidation and dislocation of care networks from the interstitial spaces within Beijing’s hutong neighborhoods. Note: The list of references at the end of the article is for the entire book - not just Chapter 7 (as a chapter by chapter list of references was not printed/available).
Invisible Migrant Enclaves in Chinese Cities: Underground Living in Beijing, China
China is experiencing an urban revolution, powered in part by hundreds of millions of migrant workers. Faced with institutionalised discrimination in the housing system and the lack of housing affordability, migrants have turned to virtually uninhabitable spaces such as basements and civil air defence shelters for housing. With hundreds of thousands of people living in crowded and dark basements, an invisible migrant enclave exists underneath the modern city of Beijing. We argue that in Chinese cities, housing has been adopted as an institution to exclude and marginalize migrants, through: (a) defining migrants as an inferior social class through the Hukou system and denying their rights to entitlements including housing; (b) abnormalising migrants through various derogatory naming and categorisations to legitimise exclusion; and (c) purifying and controlling migrant spaces to achieve exclusion and marginalisation. The forced popularity of basement renting reflects the reality that housing has become an institution of exclusion and marginalisation. It embodies vertical spatial marginalisation, with exacerbated contrasts between basement tenants and urban residents, heightened fear of the ‘other’, even more derogatory naming, and the government’s more aggressive clean-up of their spaces. We call for reforms and policy changes to ensure decent and affordable housing for basement tenants and migrants in general.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.