Fracturing Infrastructure (Anthropology Now CUNY Graduate School Student Collective) (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Promise of Infrastructure, 2018
From U.S.-Mexico border walls to Flint's poisoned pipes, there is a new urgency to the politics of infrastructure. Roads, electricity lines, water pipes, and oil installations promise to distribute the resources necessary for everyday life. Yet an attention to their ongoing processes also reveals how infrastructures are made with fragile and often violent relations among people, materials, and institutions. While infrastructures promise modernity and development, their breakdowns and absences reveal the underbelly of progress, liberal equality, and economic growth. This tension, between aspiration and failure, makes infrastructure a productive location for social theory. Contributing to the everyday lives of infrastructure across four continents, some of the leading anthropologists of infrastructure demonstrate in The Promise of Infrastructure how these more-than-human assemblages made over more-than-human lifetimes offer new opportunities to theorize time, politics, and promise in the contemporary moment.
Social Infrastructure for Our Times
Sacred Civics
Infrastructure, at its most fundamental level, is not about roads & bridges, cable and concrete. It's about who we are, what we value and what kind of society we want to create. Eric Klinenberg
Bill Gates as Social Engineer: Introducing the World’s Largest Liberal Philanthropist
Recent critical scholarship has drawn attention to the antidemocratic influence of conservative philanthropists on the evolution of global civil society, but few researchers have focused on the similarly antidemocratic trends that have resulted from the influence of Leftleaning capitalist funders. Indeed while many people may think that the pro-free market doctrine of Right leaning philanthropoids may receive better funding than liberal (progressive) foundations this is not necessarily the case. Instead, the Right has simply acted with more cohesion, and consciously worked at influencing policy makers and politicians at an ideological level, while the Left has adopted a more haphazard reactive approach to tempering the excesses of our capitalist society. In most cases researchers have also tended to assume that liberal funders have only had noble (progressive) intentions to strengthen democracy, and while this may be true to a point, this paper will demonstrate that this charity is ultimately given to sustain capitalism (albeit a less harsh version compared to that proposed by their fellow Right-wing philanthropists). This paper will furnish a detailed overview of the Bill Gates' philanthropic foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The Gates foundation is currently the largest liberal foundation in the world, and distributes over $2 billion worth of grants a year to ostensibly progressive causes. By providing the first comprehensive outline of the contours of the people and groups associated with the Gates Foundations work, this paper will critically investigate Bill Gates role as a global social engineer. It is hoped that by delineating the Gates Foundations massive yet so far undocumented impact on global civil society, that critical scholars will begin to think more seriously about how alternative more democratic funding systems for progressive activism and research might be launched and sustained in the future.
20200515 Anthropology Earth’s Road to Recovery Investing in Infrastructure Donald Trump Part
This article addresses the issues and possible solutions of the Pandemic Covid-19. In addition, it also addresses the political, economic and conflict situations around the world. This article addresses the dire need for a One Earth Nation in light of the Pandemic, the Polarized World, seventy years of on going Conflicts, Tragedies, Trauma, Displacements, Refugees and Genocide. Invest in Health, Housing and Education. Support them with programs and fill them with good people. Build Housing Schemes, Health Clinics and Education Centers. These will be owned and run by the Government/Private Partnership. This is not socialism or communism. It is a government with a social conscience. After he became President, he cut back on all social programs even the CDC. This is one reason why he has a problem with the Pandemic right now. He has to build and run these programs in such a way that they are self-sustaining for years and years to come. And not give these projects to Jared his son in-law. Running a country is not the same as running a family owned Business empire. Please, he must sit down in unity with Nancy Pelosi
How we must rethink what infrastructure is to address the challenges of the Anthropocene. We need to grasp infrastructure as potential or stored energy systems. But we must also avoid embracing the revolutionary models of the 19th and 20th century that were focused on building massive energy-intensive industrial machines. Instead, we need to practice becoming revolutionary infrastructure ourselves, committing ourselves to an ethics of hyposubjective rebecoming.
Cultural Studies, 2021
Over the past decade, commercial social media platforms have scaled up, in terms of the number of users, and scaled out, in terms of integration into public life, taking on infrastructural significance. This paper adapts sociologist Norbert Elias' conceptualization of the civilizing process to examine the role of social media in society, arguing that social media platforms establish socially sanctioned categories of people and modes of conduct. Taking Facebook as an exemplar, the paper analyzes the pedagogical, punitive, and incentivizing practices through which platforms produce social norms and societal ideals. From the company's ambition to become the social infrastructure of the globe and its expansionist history, to policy documents and moderation practices, to formatted interactions and incentive structures, Facebook universalizes appropriate conduct and emotional expression in accordance with the interests of brands and advertisers. With its integration of information technology and automated decision making, Facebook takes over tasks traditionally associated with institutions like the home, the school, and the workplace and acts as a civilizing infrastructure in a double sense: first, infrastructure itself is civilized by the ability to sense and judge people and actions, and second, infrastructure becomes a civilizing force in the world on the basis of these abilities. Finally, the article concludes with a discussion of the implications of civilizing infrastructure for our understanding of civility, Facebook, and infrastructural politics.