Frontiers of Civil Society: Government and Hegemony in Serbia. Introduction: What and Whose Reform? Civil Society and Serbia’s Endless Transition (original) (raw)
Related papers
Civil-society Building, ‘Advanced Liberal’ Governmentality and the State in Serbia
The democratisation of governance in postsocialist Eastern Europe has been associated with civil- society building through international development initiatives. Anthropologists criticised it as ‘NGO-isation’ and building of a ‘project society’. This paper deals with latest stages of civil- society building in Serbia, typified by the development of ‘public advocacy’ and ‘local fundraising’. In my anthropological work-in-progress, I study such programs of the Balkan Community Initiatives Fund, a Belgrade re-granting foundation, and its grantee organizations in Serbia. These initiatives introduce ‘advanced liberal’ governmentality to Serbia which constructs relationships of civil society and ‘political society’ in a depoliticised manner consistent with the assumptions of good governance. Taking my cues from the polity approach, governmentality theory and anthropology of the state and postsocialism, I show how civil society interacts with the state in practice when being ‘developed’ in a context shaped by socialist and ethnonationalist governmentalities.
Civil Society in Serbia after Milošević: Between Authoritarianism and Wishful Thinking
Polish Sociological Review, 2003
Starting from an understanding of civil society that combines the descriptive aspect of the concept with an analysis of the normative connotations it carries in public discourse, this paper discusses the current condition of civil society in Serbia against the backdrop of its tumultuous recent history. This backdrop is presented in the form of a brief overview of the enclaves
Between defiance and compliance: a new civil society in the post-Yugoslav space
In the past couple of years, against the backdrop of the dominant liberal model of civil society we have witnessed the rise of new initiatives in the post-Yugoslav space. From the workers uprising, students mobilization to protests for defense of common goods, these initiatives seem to speak to the emergence of a civil society that is critical of neoliberal capitalism and the dominant model of post-socialist transition. In this article I examine one such ongoing initiative, dubbed ’We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own’, against a big construction project on the river banks in Serbia’s capital. By analyzing the discourse and some elements of its practice, such as networking, forms of action, knowledge production and funding, I examine the relationship between this initiative and the dominant transitional discourses and practices of liberal civil society. While this mobilization appears as an attempt to move away from the liberal NGO model and to introduce structural and class issues as notions around which political action can be waged, I show that at the same time it relies on, and draws from, the liberal civil society practice and dominant transitional discourses. I contend that in order to better understand the ‘new wave’ of mobilizations and their emancipatory potential we need to further explore the ambiguities and ambivalences present in their relationship to the liberal civil society and mainstream transitional landscape.
Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and Opportunities - country report - Serbia
Civil society in Serbia was described as “suppressed” during previous undemocratic regimes. After being one of the main actors in the initial process of democratizing Serbia, civil society failed to gain influence in the new circumstances. Although the new legal environment does not pose obstacles to the work of CSOs, civil society is facing new problems: a lack of international financial support, an underdeveloped local economy without incentives to support the work of CSOs, and passive citizens who rarely engage in social or political activism. Two opposing trends are currently shaping the role and position of civil society in Serbia: European Union integration processes, which are enabling greater influence on the part of CSOs, and the diminishing democratic standards of the last few Serbian governments (with specific emphasis on media freedom, transparency and accountability), which have narrowed the political space for civil engagement. In circumstances that can still be described as transitional, a new generation of civil society actors and leaders have emerged with new approaches and ideas. Some of them became more visible during the 2014 flood crisis and the refugee crisis in 2015, when civil society once again showed its full capacity to respond and assist in extraordinary circumstances.
Rethinking Ethnography in Central Europe, 2015
"Anthropological work on the integration of post-socialist Europe into the European Union is inchoate and overly focused on the issues of identity. Mikuš offers a historical anthropological analysis of EU integration of Serbia as a political, path-dependent, and simultaneously material and discursive process of social transformation. The focus is on practices through which Serbian 'civil society' helps further this process, such as 'boundary crossing' and 'partnerships' with the state, and on forces and relationships at and between various scales that shape this supporting role. The chapter concludes by reconceptualizing civil society and European integration and discussing methodological and political implications of the approach taken."
Habits of the Heart: Grassroots " Revitalization " and State Transformation in Serbia
Cultures of Doing Good: Anthropologists and NGOs, edited by Amanda Lashaw, Christian Vannier, and Steven Sampson, 2017
Since the mid-90s the concept of Civil Society appears more and more often as a global axiom in development discourse and policies dealing with transition and reconciliation in post-communist and post-conflict countries. This chapter will offer some anthropological insights of a USAID-funded “Democracy promotion” program, implemented in Serbia from 2001 to 2007. The aid-intervention called “Community Revitalization through Democratic Action” was promising a rupture of what was thought to be a “communist culture of dependency” through the promotion of civic engagement at the grassroots level, i.e through creating and “empowering” dozens of local NGOs. First, I set to describe and understand the doings and outcomes of this project through analyzing the multilevel power relations built around it, the various meanings, strategies and conflicts wedded around the normative discourse of ‘participation’. Second, I argue that this civil-society program had very little to do with “bringing back the people” but was instead targeting the re-structuring and re-scaling of state structures, with very diverse outcomes
This is a pre-review, pre-copy edit manuscript of my chapter whose final version was included in Rethinking Ethnography in Central Europe, a collection edited by Hana Cervinkova, Michal Buchowski and Zdenek Uherek and published in September 2015 by Palgrave Macmillan. More information and a sample chapter (introduction) are available here: http://www.palgrave.com/page/detail/Rethinking-Ethnography-in-Central-Europe/?sf1=barcode&st1=9781137524485\. Anthropological work on the integration of post-socialist Europe into the European Union is inchoate and overly focused on the issues of identity. Mikuš offers a historical anthropological analysis of EU integration of Serbia as a political, path-dependent, and simultaneously material and discursive process of social transformation. The focus is on practices through which Serbian 'civil society' helps further this process, such as 'boundary crossing' and 'partnerships' with the state, and on forces and relationships at and between various scales that shape this supporting role. The chapter concludes by reconceptualizing civil society and European integration and discussing methodological and political implications of the approach taken.
The Dark Side of Civil Society in the Western Balkans
While civil society is often seen as a valuable asset for promoting and protecting liberal and democratic values, it can also be used to advance populist and illiberal political views. Illiberal NGOs in Western Balkans nowadays use different vocabulary and new strategies to disguise their illiberal claims and policies as a human rights discourse. The Left thus has to construct new arguments to be able to properly address the claims advanced by illiberal extreme-right NGOs, but also has to increase its participatory potential to be able to mobilize the citizens who no longer feel represented by the left-wing parties.