Students' Perspective on Teacher's Written Corrective Feedback: Direct and Indirect (original) (raw)
Related papers
Teachers’ Written Corrective Feedback Strategies Through the Lens of the Students
Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature
This descriptive-qualitative study was conducted to venture the written corrective feedback strategies employed by the College of Teacher Education teachers in a private university in Davao City, Philippines. The study utilized thematic analysis to analyze the data gathered from the in-depth interviews of eight selected participants through a purposive sampling technique. The data revealed teachers' seven written corrective feedback strategies: lexical written feedback, grammatical written feedback, organization in writing, motivating written feedback, metalinguistic feedback, and verification feedback. Additionally, this study uncovered the impact of written corrective feedback strategies, namely improvement of lexical skills, improvement of sentence structure, improvement of grammatical skills, development of the organization in writing, enhancement of self-regulation, a decrease of the affective filter, and improvement of learning productivity. The results of this study prese...
Students’ Perception towards Direct Feedback Practices in Writing
This study investigates the second year students' perception of feedback practices in English language classroom. The participants included in this research are 30 students who are currently pursuing the engineering courses at one of the public university at Malaysia. Findings revealed that the students were motivated when they received the instructor's feedback. They claimed that the constructive feedback were able to guide them well while completing their continuous assessment. When feedback was absent, they would have the uncertainty feeling to complete their assignments. Hence, feedback indeed plays an encouraging role to the students in improving their writing and gain writing proficiency from instructors' insight.
International Journal of English Linguistics, 2017
The discrepancy between students’ preferences and teacher practices for feedback on writing has created difficulty on the side of teachers and confusion on the side of the students. What teachers believe and practice as effective feedback for students may not be the one that students perceive as useful and effective feedback for them. This paper investigates the types of written feedback preferred by the students and the types of feedback provided by the teachers on students’ writing. This study employed a survey design which involved 54 students and 22 teachers using convenience sampling technique. The instrument used in collecting data was a questionnaire in the form of Feedback Scale. The results showed that there were some points of compatibility between students’ preferences and teachers’ practices and some other points were incompatible. The data showed that both students and teachers preferred to have or to give direct feedback but the data also indicated that students liked ...
Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences
This survey study aims to describe the students’ perception of teachers’ written feedback in an academic writing class in a private university in Indonesia. 119 students filled in the questionnaire on students’ perceptions of teachers’ written feedback adapted from Ouahidi and Lamkhanter (2020). A descriptive statistic measuring mean, frequency, and standard deviation were used to analyze the data from the questionnaire. The results showed that the teacher’s written feedback to the writing results in the academic writing class was useful and students did not find it difficult to understand any feedback given by the teacher. Most of the students answered often when being asked about their understanding to the feedback. Students were also able to use teacher comments to revise their writing. Revision and rewriting were also found as the follow-up activities that are most often done by students after receiving feedback. Then, it was also revealed that students preferred their teacher t...
2018
This research aimed at describing 1) the types of lecturer’s corrective feedback, 2) the functions of corrective feedback, and 3) the dominant type of corrective feedback used by the lecturers. The researcher used qualitative research method in collecting and analyzing the data. This research took place at Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. The researcher acquired the data through observation in the classroom, interview with the lecturers and collecting the students’ worksheet which corrected by the lecturers. The result of this research showed that 1) The lecturers used 4 types of oral corrective feedback and 2 types of written corrective feedback, namely direct and indirect feedback (coded and uncoded) , 2) there were several functions of oral corrective feedback oral (giving the students a guideline, giving motivation by complimenting the students, assisting the students to analyze their error, developing the interaction between teacher and students) and written corrective fee...
Direct and indirect written corrective feedback in learning writing: The students' perception
Journal of Research in Instructional, 2023
This study was carried out based on the hottest issue regarding the role of direct and indirect written corrective feedback (WCF). The role and use of direct WCF and indirect WCF have been debated issues among second language acquisition and writing researchers. The controversial issue regarding the necessity of feedback started from Truscott's comment that direct written corrective feedback does not improve students' writing skills. This research explored the students' perception of direct WCF and indirect indirect WCF. Qualitative descriptive was applied in this research involving 30 students as the subject. A questionnaire and interview were carried out as the instruments in collecting data. An interactive model that included data collecting, coding, data display, and conclusion or verification was employed for the data analysis. The findings suggested that direct written corrective feedback had a beneficial impact because 99.91% of students said they preferred it.
Students’ Perception and Preferences of Written Feedback in Academic Writing
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2013
Writing in a second language is not an easy task for students. Yet, it is an important skill for them to acquire in order to succeed in university. The aim of this study is to investigate ESL tertiary students' perception on the importance and effectiveness of written feedback in their academic writing assignments. The study also aims to examine students' preferred feedback in helping them revise and improve their written assignments. The subjects are 34 Diploma students. Data was gathered via a questionnaire adapted from Ferris (1995), Leki (1999) and Hedgecock and Leftkowitz (1994). Findings reveal that students view feedback as important and necessary to help them improve their writing ability. Findings also revealed that students prefer feedback in the form of grammar correction and suggestions on how to improve. The least preferred feedback are questions and one-word comments.
Students’ Voices on Lecturers’ Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) in Their Writing Tasks
2021
ABSTRACTAlthough studies on Written Corrective Feedback (WCF, hereafter) have been increasingly prevalent in the last few years, inquiries on how advisory students perceive the lecturers’ feedback on their writing tasks have been likely scarce, especially in Indonesian Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) contexts. This study examines the students’ perception and evaluation of the lecturers’ WCF in response to errors and inaccuracies in their academic writing tasks. Through an online survey questionnaire distributed to 46 respondents via email, the results show that the majority of students appreciated any forms of feedback from the lecturers. Their writing skills in four aspects (grammar, vocabulary, organization, and mechanics) also improved significantly through an enhancement of their self-directed learning. Following the analysis model by one of previous studies, the results showed that the students preferred direct WCF to the Indirect one (58.7 %: 15.2 %), while the “Praise” c...
Students’ Perceptions about Feedback Practices During Academic Writing Course: A Survey Study
2021
In Indonesian context, there is still very little research regarding how students’ voicing their perception on the use of feedback practices by their teachers. Therefore, to fill this gap, this research is aimed to describe students’ perception through a survey about their experiences in dealing with feedback practices by their teacher. This study involved 75 students from English department students of English courses and college. The Responsive Pedagogy Questionnaire (RPQ) was used in this study. There were 24 items with 4 Likert points in data completion. To analyze the data, Microsoft Excel was used by the researcher. Findings showed that teachers’ feedback practice matters to the students (M=3.70). It means that the participants have positive responses toward teacher feedback practices. These findings have pedagogical implications that teachers of academic writing can consider not only to the instructions but also to the content or the material.