Optimizing glenoid component position using three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction (original) (raw)

Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2006

Risk factors for loosening of cemented glenoid components in anatomical shoulder arthroplasty

Obere Extremität, 2019

Evaluation of the glenoid implant survival using a biomechanical finite element analysis: Influence of the implant design, bone properties, and loading location

Pascal Swider

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Fixation of glenoid component: Keel versus pegs

Carl Basamania

Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics, 1994

View PDFchevron_right

New design of a cementless glenoid component in unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective medium-term analysis of 143 cases

Jean Kany

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

The effects of glenoid component alignment variations on cement mantle stresses in total shoulder arthroplasty

Roger Emery

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

CT scan evaluation of glenoid component fixation: a prospective study of 27 minimally cemented shoulder arthroplasties

F. Guichoux

2016

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of press-fit versus peripherally cemented hybrid glenoid components in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up

William Barfield

JSES International, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Sequential 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis of implant position following total shoulder arthroplasty

Eric Rodriguez

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Normal glenoid vault anatomy and validation of a novel glenoid implant shape

Katherine Gordiev

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study

Andrew Sankey, Roger Emery

PLoS ONE, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Computed tomography quantification of bone density adjacent to cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in shoulder arthroplasty

Paolo Paladini

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens

April Armstrong

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Radiographic analysis of shoulder anatomical arthroplasty

Giovanni Merolla, Paolo Paladini

European Journal of Radiology, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Radiographic comparison of flat-back and convex-back glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty

Pascal Boileau

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Radiographic Comparison of Two Glenoid Preparation Techniques in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Pascal Boileau

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Radiographic and computed tomography analysis of cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in total shoulder replacement

Christian Pfirrmann

View PDFchevron_right

Glenoid morphology after reaming in computer-simulated total shoulder arthroplasty

Thomas Gardner

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Mid-term survivorship analysis of a shoulder replacement with a keeled glenoid and a modern cementing technique

P. Kasten

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Addressing glenoid bone deficiency and asymmetric posterior erosion in shoulder arthroplasty

Russell Huffman

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of Asymmetric Reaming versus a Posteriorly Augmented Component for Posterior Glenoid Wear and Retroversion: A Radiographic Study

Bryan Loeffler

PubMed, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Hemiarthroplasty versus total shoulder prosthesis: Results of cemented glenoid components

Lionel Neyton

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Preoperative glenoid considerations for shoulder arthroplasty: a review

Michael Khazzam

EFORT Open Reviews, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

The Radiographic Evaluation of Keeled and Pegged Glenoid Component Insertion

Mark Lazarus

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Does keel size, the use of screws, and the use of bone cement affect fixation of a metal glenoid implant?

Allan Liew

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement

Raffaele Garofalo

Shoulder & Elbow, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Glenoid Perforation With Pegged Components During Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

David Glaser

Orthopedics, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Simulation of surgical glenoid resurfacing using three-dimensional computed tomography of the arthritic glenohumeral joint: The amount of glenoid retroversion that can be corrected

Thomas Gardner

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Role of Cement in Glenoid Replacement

William R Walsh

View PDFchevron_right

Metal-backed glenoid implant with polyethylene insert is not a viable long-term therapeutic option

Cyrille Avidor

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning

Bong Jun

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Optimizing glenoid component position using three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction (original) (raw)

Related papers