The Scale of Urban: World Urbanisation and Architectural Reactions (original) (raw)
Related papers
ZARCH Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies of Architecture and Urbanism, 2016
Prácticas espaciales en un mundo urbano. Revalorización del territorio y la ecología como un nuevo terreno para la arquitectura y el diseño urbano Spatial practices in an urban world. Reassessing territory and ecology as a new ground for architecture and urban design Prácticas espaciales en un mundo urbano. Revalorización del territorio y la ecología como un nuevo terreno para la arquitectura y el diseño urbano Spatial practices in an urban world. Reassessing territory and ecology as a new ground for architecture and urban design ADRIÀ CARBONELL Resumen En este trabajo plantea que para comprender los procesos contemporáneos de urbanización neoliberal y revetir su lucrativa destrucción, es necesario abordar la dimensión planetaria de los fenómenos y reconvertir el mar isotrópico de la urbanización en territorios y ecologías sostenibles.
In our engagement with Neil Brenner and Christian Schmid's thesis on planetary urbanization we argue that, while they have successfully marked some important limits of mainstream thinking on the urban, their privileging of epistemology cannot produce an urban theory for our time. Engaging in a symptomatic reading of their work, and with a focus on the implications of their limited mobilization of social ontology—or Lefebvre's ontology of the everyday—we ask what is occluded in planetary urbanization. In particular, we explore three areas of concern: the urban as the grounds for difference, centrality and the everyday; the omission of subjects of and occlusion of subjectivity; and the occlusion of a constitutive outside and its political capacities to remake the urban. The changing geographies and pace of urbanization over the past half century have been recasting urban theory, governance, and policy on a global stage. The second decade of the 21st-century is proving to be an especially momentous time for urban knowledge production in which the political stakes are enormously high, with the urban figuring as both cause and consequence of many contemporary planetary issues: the urban is both the instigator of and the solution to global climate change; it is the site of increasing inequality and the urbanization of poverty even as it is also a crucible for innovation and creativity; and it is ground zero for a new era of global governance. 1 Within this climate of different political possibilities for the urban, a number of competing, conflicting, and complementary geographical imaginaries have emerged to make sense of contemporary urbanization.
Planetary urbanization: An urban theory for our time
In our engagement with Neil Brenner and Christian Schmid's thesis on planetary urbanization we argue that, while they have successfully marked some important limits of mainstream thinking on the urban, their privileging of epistemology cannot produce an urban theory for our time. Engaging in a symptomatic reading of their work, and with a focus on the implications of their limited mobilization of social ontology-or Lefebvre's ontology of the everyday-we ask what is occluded in planetary urbanization. In particular, we explore three areas of concern: the urban as the grounds for difference, centrality and the everyday; the omission of subjects of and occlusion of subjectivity; and the occlusion of a constitutive outside and its political capacities to remake the urban.
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2018
SHAPING CONTEMPORARY URBAN AREAS IN CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (Book summary)
2013
This work deals with shaping contemporary urban space in the context of the idea of sustainable development. The essence of sustainable development is rational use of resources and maximizing social, economic and environmental benefits from human activities. As most of those activities take place in cities and is conditioned, to some extent, by the way cities are organized, naturally the idea of sustainable development has several implications for urban design.
Explaining the Concept of Urbanisation based on the Distinction between the City and the Urban
Soffeh , 2021
Globally, the urban condition has fundamentally changed, resulting in the emergence of new urban spaces influenced by new modes of urbanisation. Discussing urbanisation or cities, assumptions arise about the nature of cities and urbanisation. Most urbanisation discourse have been city-cantered, as they have understood the city as the driver and cause of urbanisation. Discussing the city without understanding the urban is often misleading, because there are both strong connections and distinctions between the two. Most of the time, the city and the urban are used as if they were one and the same concept, with no spatiotemporal differences. They are different because they correspond to different processes of transformation and space reproduction. The aim of the current study is to compare the two concepts of the city and the urban, based on the status of each in urbanisation. Accordingly, appropriate readings are proposed to provide an understanding of these two phenomena. Based on the intellectual principles of qualitative content analysis, this research explains the conceptual framework of the distinct components of the city and the urban. The results show that urbanisation has been explained in four conceptual levels: urbanisation centred on the growth of the city that the urban as its adjective, urbanisation based on the urban transformed into a noun, urbanisation centred on the urban and weakening the city, and the urban as utopia.
Introduction: Urbanism and Sustainability
While we are preparing for an urban age with a population that will exceed 60 percent of the world’s total, sustainability is the buzzword now in urban studies. It has become the goal of urban planners, city designers, administrators, economists, and anthropologists involved in the process of urbanization. Alexandru Balasescu goes further to argue that each one of us shapes the city in which we live. The city is the result of humanity’s decisions regarding their habitat; it is the material form of human emotions, desires, and ways of understanding of (and relating to) the world. We shape the city and the city shapes us. Taking Bucharest and Istanbul as examples, he discusses urban sustainability from the perspective of conflict solutions and futures. He reproblematizes the goal of sustainability, which he sees as locked up in the rhetoric of economic growth, and brings into the conversation on sustainability the concepts of cohabitation, negotiation, and harmony. KEYWORDS Istanbul; Bucharest; economic growth; cities; cohabitation; star architecture; transport