'Digital Platforms: Redefining Relations between Whistle-Blowers and the Media' (original) (raw)
Related papers
The ethico-politics of whistleblowing:Mediated truth-telling in digital cultures
2019
As addressed in previous issues of ephemera, in contemporary political economy, the conjunction of openness and closure, visibility and invisibility, and transparency and secrecy of information is precarious (e.g. Bachmann et al., 2017; Curtis and Weir, 2016). Information and ‘truth’ have been turned into objects of contention, and it is increasingly contested what is considered sound information and truth, who has access to which type of information, and who is in the position to shape and control information and promote truth(s) (Munro, 2017). The struggles and complexities of negotiating information, truth and the ‘politics of truth’ (Foucault, 2007) are also accompanied by the fact that, in a society in which mass communication and media gain in importance, organisations have become ‘leaky containers’ (Lyon, 2002). This is evidenced in an exemplary way by the NSA affair and Edward Snowden’s revelations of mass surveillance, the WikiLeaks-disclosures, commonly associated with the...
A Digital Ménage à Trois: Strategic Leaks, Propaganda and Journalism [DRAFT ATTACHED]
Countering Online Propaganda and Violent Extremism: The Dark Side of Digital Diplomacy, 2018
While leaking isn't new, the scale of recent data releases and new methods deployed by political actors to influence public opinion transform the process. State and non-state actors controlling the flow of information (from politicians and governments, to those seeking to undermine them, such as whistleblowers) have long used leaks strategically to shape public opinion, decision-making and the distribution of power itself. Increasingly leaks are used within a networked propaganda strategy to offer pressures and opportunities unique to our globalised digital age. Powerful, competing elites, and those seeking to disrupt or question their power, both combine leaking with emerging advanced methodologies in hacking, (counter-)surveillance and propaganda, meaning these cannot be understood in isolation in today's information environment. This chapter introduces readers to scholarly and popular debates regarding strategic leaking, propaganda and journalistic reporting. We focus on political, governmental and whistleblowing disclosures affecting the US, analysing how key actors attempt to manage and exploit leaks in the case studies of the 2016 US presidential election and the 'Panama Papers'. We aim to generate discussion about the role of leaks in shaping public perceptions within democracies, ultimately questioning how such disclosures are used by whom and why.
Protecting Sources and Whistleblowers in a Digital Age
2017
A working report published as part of an initiative supported by Guardian News and Media, based on research conducted at the Information Law and Policy Centre, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies. Launched at an event in Parliament on 22nd February 2017.
Ethical Risks, Informers, Whistleblowers, Leaks and Clamor for Transparency
Brazilian Journalism Research
Leaks and whistleblowers have been increasingly used for the production of large media coverage. Characters like Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange and informers of “Operation Car Wash” in Brazil have become not only useful for the process of transparency and accountability, but also signal traps to reporters and newsrooms. In this article, I present the concept of Ethical Risk and I list a number of its forms in contemporary journalistic production, driven by WikiLeaks, Panama Papers and transformations of democratic societies
The Pentagon Papers, WikiLeaks and Edward Snowden are among the most topical whistleblowing cases where journalists got involved to publish articles based on leaked information. On occasion of these major leaks, strategies of circulation restrictions were activated in order to stop the dissemination of the leaked material. In the Pentagon Papers case, The New York Times first published the material and received a restraining order to stop the publication (Diamond 1993); WikiLeaks was targeted with digital DDoS attacks aimed at putting it offline. In the case of Edward Snowden, The Guardian was instead forced to physically destroy hard drives where leaked documents were allegedly stored (Greenwald 2014a). This paper analyses the evolution of content circulation restriction strategies and their effectiveness in whistleblowing cases by means of the three aforementioned case studies, focusing on the material nature of the leaked documents. The analysis focuses on issues of digital materialization, content circulation and journalism, contributing to the debate on these topics in STS.
It's All in the Game: Journalism, Whistleblowing and Democracy Under the Rules of the Global Economy
Making Transparency Possible, 2019
An increasingly opaque global economy demands new forms of collaboration for journalists and civil society actors protecting democracy and the rule of law. Countries and jurisdictions have developed a deeply intertwined network of financial services and a social, political and physical infrastructure enabling regulatory evasion, tax avoidance, and eradicating accountability in business operations. Whis-tleblowers have in recent years made a solid impact on new discussions of the role of the tax haven complex in the global economy. Collaboration with whistleblowers is a strategy that journalists and civil society have utilized to overcome the challenges of investigating big players in the economy. This collaboration calls upon parliaments to update their legislation affecting collaborative investigative journalism. This article examines discussions on whistleblower protection in both the EU and Norway in light of the Lux Leaks whistleblower-journalist collaboration, and the internal whis-tleblower in the Telenor/VimpelCom corruption case. Attention is also drawn to the increase in international collaboration among investigative journalists.
This article argues that explanations for the non-reporting of the phone hacking scandal need to delve beyond simplistic, if valid, assertions of industry cover-up. We analyse how a definition of ‘newsworthiness’ based on the public interest can be undermined by a combination of professional, political and commercial interests. Together they form an explanation for the press’s collective redaction of developments in the phone hacking story until July 2011. We demonstrate, therefore, that the vigour of journalism and healthy democratic debate is not merely dependent on the effective regulation of what is reported, it is also dependent on ensuring that harmful illegal activity is regarded as sufficiently ‘newsworthy’ to be investigated and reported.
The Right of Journalists Not to Disclose Their Sources and the New Media
This essay deals with the question of whether the right of journalists not to disclose their sources should be extended so as to cover the various ‘citizen journalists’ of the New Media. After expounding some jurisprudential attempts to confront this issue in the USA and after tracing the restrictive tendencies in the available instruments of the Council of Europe, we examine and then criticize a recent attempt to escape the problem through focusing on the ‘source’ rather than on the ‘journalist’. Returning back to the traditional context of the debate, in the last section of our essay we propose an enlargement of the traditional conception of the ‘journalist’, in order to provide protection to all persons who disseminate information to the general public through the use of New Media, on condition that these persons had the intent to do so (i.e. to disseminate information) already at the inception of the information-gathering process.
The Secret of Justice, Privacy and Journalism, in the era of Digital Capitalism
The article addresses human rights, in particular freedom of expression and the right to privacy, including on the Internet, proposing to emphasize the issue of their dialectics in the context of contemporary digital society that, in the face of the digitization of modern life, face many challenges. It becomes necessary in this way, understand, through a theoretical review, the history of fundamental humanrights, through historical reference documents; a psychosocial analysis of the concepts of Freedom and Privacy; the normative framework in which they fall; the Internet as a platform for exercising rights and freedoms; and the problems associated with it; digital data, people's movements; citizen surveillance; social engineering of power; online social networks and e-commerce, spaces of trust and conflict.