Science as a Vocation in the Era of Big Data: the Philosophy of Science behind Big Data and humanity’s Continued Part in Science (original) (raw)
Related papers
Mazzocchi F.. (2015). Could Big Data Be the End of Theory in Science? A Few Remarks on the Epistemology of Data-Driven Science. EMBO Reports 16(10): 1250-1255. doi: 10.15252/embr.201541001
In this brief work, I reflect on Big Data and their implications for scientific research. In particular, I critically scrutinize the idea, advanced by some Big Data supporters, that Big Data science would represent a whole new way of doing research, in which the role of hypotheses and theories is superseded.
BIG DATA, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND PHILOSOPHY
What is the epistemological status of Big Data? Considering the revolution Big Data is bringing to science's methodology, it is important to ask the question. And the answer, if any, can only come from Philosophy
Philosophy of Big Data: Expanding the Human-Data Relation with Big Data Science Services
2015 IEEE First International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications, 2015
Big data is growing as an area of information technology, service, and science, and so too is the need for its intellectual understanding and interpretation from a theoretical, philosophical, and societal perspective. The Philosophy of Big Data is the branch of philosophy concerned with the foundations, methods, and implications of big data; the definitions, meaning, conceptualization, knowledge possibilities, truth standards, and practices in situations involving very-large data sets that are big in volume, velocity, variety, veracity, and variability. The Philosophy of Big Data is evolving into a discipline at two levels, one internal to the field as a generalized articulation of the concepts, theory, and systems that comprise the overall conduct of big data science. The other is external to the field; as a consideration of the impact of big data science more broadly on individuals, society, and the world. Methods, tools, and concepts are evaluated at both the level of industry practice theory and social impact. Three aspects are considered: what might constitute a Philosophy of Big Data, how the disciplines of the Philosophy of Information and the Philosophy of Big Data are developing, and an example of the Philosophy of Big Data in application in the data-intensive science field of Synthetic Biology. Overall a Philosophy of Big Data might helpful in conceptualizing and realizing big data science as a service practice, and also in transitioning to data-rich futures with human and data entities more productively co-existing in mutual growth and collaboration. Keywords-big data; philosophy; information; scientific method; research; methodology; human-data relations "The Philosophy of Information is a completely new development with a capacity to revolutionize philosophy and human interactions with science, technology, data, and reality" -Luciano Floridi, Philosophy of Information, Oxford [1].
Big Data Between Technology and Science: Challenges for Psychology and Social Sciences
2020
Among phrases that originated in the context of IT and have become virally immersed in everyday life is “big data”. Especially with the work of Kosinski and his colleagues, it has gained considerable attention in psychology and related disciplines, and following the Brexit and the US presidential election campaigns in 2016, has spread beyond the sphere of strict science. In the article we question whether big data research represents a distinctively new endeavour in the empirical sciences. From a methodological and analytical perspective, the three Vs of big data, volume, velocity and variety – represent challenges that foster new (interdisciplinary) strategies to handle them properly, but from the more traditional psychological perspective, a fourth V – veracity, addressing the importance of data truthfulness – raises additional questions. However, from the perspective of psychology and the social sciences, ethical considerations, addressing questions of privacy, anonymity and auto...
The era of Big Data has begun. Computer scientists, physicists, economists, mathematicians, political scientists, bio-informaticists, sociologists, and other scholars are clamoring for access to the massive quantities of information produced by and about people, things, and their interactions. Diverse groups argue about the potential benefits and costs of analyzing genetic sequences, social media interactions, health records, phone logs, government records, and other digital traces left by people. Significant questions emerge. Will large-scale search data help us create better tools, services, and public goods? Or will it usher in a new wave of privacy incursions and invasive marketing? Will data analytics help us understand online communities and political movements? Or will it be used to track protesters and suppress speech? Will it transform how we study human communication and culture, or narrow the palette of research options and alter what ‘research’ means? Given the rise of Big Data as a socio-technical phenomenon, we argue that it is necessary to critically interrogate its assumptions and biases. In this article, we offer six provocations to spark conversations about the issues of Big Data: a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon that rests on the interplay of technology, analysis, and mythology that provokes extensive utopian and dystopian rhetoric.
Big Data: Philosophy, emergence, crowdledge, and science education
Big Data already passed out of hype, is now a field that deserves serious academic investigation, and natural scientists should also become familiar with Analytics. On the other hand, there is little empirical evidence that any science taught in school is helping people to lead happier, more prosperous, or more politically well-informed lives. In this work, we seek support in the Philosophy and Constructionism literatures to discuss the realm of the concepts of Big Data and its philosophy, the notions of 'emergence' and crowdledge, and how we see learning-with-Big-Data as a promising new way to learn Science.
The Coming Epistemic Transition From Small to Big Data Discover Society
Current attitudes towards 'big data' are quite mixed including positive, negative and various kinds of 'so what?' reactions. The big data enthusiasts dominate the media and literature but other perspectives are emerging. The rapid development of AI and some quite specific kinds of algorithmic applications are seen as a threat to specific groups and individuals. And not without reason. The rise of datafication means that increasingly sophisticated digital technologies not only produce, but monitor and analyse, big data outputs, often in 'real-time'. These, in turn, add an element of panopticism to the comparatively slow and cumbersome small data technologies with which we are all familiar. The results imply a coming transition when this situation effectively crosses over from the conventional 'small data' paradigm we have lived for with most of the 20 th century into one in which big data is the norm. As a growing number of commentators have pointed out, this 'transition' has a variety of epistemological implications. In this context, big data is not simply a case of more is better (or worse, depending on your position) but an indicator that the rigidities of the small data paradigm are gradually losing ground in relation to new data technologies and their associated epistemologies. By this we mean that the rise of big data perspectives, methods and strategies is contributing to new ways of understanding and thinking about 'data' and the kind of knowledge the small-to-big data transition is leading us towards. In effect, as the technologies of big data expand, we can expect to see an epistemological impact. The growing intersectionalities of technology, data characteristics and methodological tools are currently in flux, meaning that new knowledge is being produced via novel approaches. We are no longer working at the height of the small data period but confronting an epistemic transition. Many conventional data environments relied on a mix of traditional manual record-keeping (e.g. patient records in healthcare), electromechanical data systems (e.g. weather data collection by observers with analogue instruments) or some combination of the two. These technologies still supported individual interpretation and expertise as well as a growing shift to calculative data practices. This was perfectly reasonable in the natural sciences but it has had a variety of problematic consequences in the social sciences and their application to 'real world' problems, as conceived of and acted on by social elites and established power structures. By the end of World War Two the idea that quantification and small data justified the use of various levels of force against civil populations was well-established even in the Cold War democracies. Better documented examples
Introduction: Big Data – Digital Technology, Loads of Empirical Materials, and a Daring Vision
Euroepean Review, 2019
The daring vision of using big data technology to substantially advance the scientific understanding of human nature, individually and socially, and possibly solve age-old challenges of bridging the subjective and objective sides of human nature, rests on substantial assumptions about the concept of a human being. The daring big data vision may at the same time, in itself, serve to change the very concept of a human, regardless of how well the vision’s assumptions and prospects hold up to scrutiny. This issue of the European Review presents an attempt to critically engage with the question of how this complex situation affects the content and prospects of the vision of reconsidering humanity with the help of big data. In this introduction, the land scape of the issue is sketched and some general remarks of where the emerging map might take future research are made. In general, even if the assumptions of the daring big data vision turn out wanting, pragmatic factors may very well transform our own image of ourselves to fit it.