A Comparative Study : Reviewing Performance of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-hoc Network (original) (raw)
Mobile Ad-hoc Network is nothing but a collection of hosts which are mobile and can configure, organize and maintain themselves according to the network. It is an independent network where the nodes are connected to other nodes through wireless links. The nodes are mobile in nature and don't need any organization, configuration, and administration. As the network topology frequently changes due to the mobility of nodes, routing in such network becomes extremely difficult. Routing solves various concerns related to network like its dynamic topology, bandwidth, overhead, delay, traffic etc. Hence based on the above issues, a comparative study has been done between the reactive, proactive and hybrid protocols on the basis of their pros and cons, to evaluate the performance of all 6 protocols (DSDV, OLSR, AODV, DSR, ZRP and FSR). So that it would be easy to choose an efficient routing protocol based on network complexity.
Related papers
A Network which is form spontaneously by the collection of wireless nodes without any centralized administration or already existing network infrastructure called Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET). Performance evaluation of different Ad-Hoc networks routing protocols viz. DSDV, AODV & DSR on the basis of four parameter such as Packet delivery ratio, throughput, packet drop and routing overhead is main objective of this paper. NS-2, which is a discrete event simulation tool, is used in which The Tool Command Language (TCL) is used for simulation of varying parameter for routing algorithm. Importance of selection criteria of routing protocols in dynamic environment is illustrated in the result of this work.
Comparison of Different Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc Network
International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 2017
In this paper we are presenting a routing protocol comparison for mobile Ad-Hoc Networks. So far, the protocols have been analyzed theoretically. Compares the result from these theoretical/qualitative analyses and shows what properties the protocols have and do not have. As it can be seen from Table, none of the protocols support power conservation or Quality of Service. This is however working in progress and will probably be added to the protocols. All protocols are distributed, thus none of the protocols is dependent on a centralized node and can therefore easily reconfigure in the event of topology changes. This paper compared seven routing protocols on the basis of four parameters like hello message requirement, update destination, routing strategy and method of communication. AODV and CBRP only uses broadcast hello message. DSDV, WRP and AODV uses distance vector routing strategy and DSR and CBRP uses source routing that uses the concept of route cache. DSDV, WRP and TORA broa...
Performance Analysis of Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc –Networks
In Mobile Ad Hoc networks (MANETs) the mobility of nodes results in frequent changes of network topology making routing in MANETs a challenging task. Some studies have been reported in the literature to evaluate the performance of the proposed routing algorithms. This paper evaluates the review of the performance of AODV, DSR, DSDV and OLSR routing protocols in MANETs under CBR traffic with different network conditions. Review of these protocols show that in different conditions different protocols behave differently. These four protocols have been reviewed under different conditions.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.